Cargando…
Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for dec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17 |
_version_ | 1782238807769219072 |
---|---|
author | Wolfenstetter, Silke B Wenig, Christina M |
author_facet | Wolfenstetter, Silke B Wenig, Christina M |
author_sort | Wolfenstetter, Silke B |
collection | PubMed |
description | This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for decision making. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies published before December 2009. All studies were analysed regarding their key economic findings and their costing methodology. In summary, 18 international economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes were identified. Many of these studies conclude that the investigated intervention provides good value for money compared with alternatives (no intervention, usual care or different programme) or is even cost-saving. Although most studies did provide a description of the cost of the intervention programme, methodological details were often not displayed, and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention were not always included sufficiently. This review shows the different costing methodologies used in the current health economic literature and compares them with a theoretical framework. The high variability regarding the costs assessment and the lack of transparency concerning the methods limits the comparability of the results, which points out the need for a handy minimal dataset of cost assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3402935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34029352012-07-25 Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature Wolfenstetter, Silke B Wenig, Christina M Health Econ Rev Review This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for decision making. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies published before December 2009. All studies were analysed regarding their key economic findings and their costing methodology. In summary, 18 international economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes were identified. Many of these studies conclude that the investigated intervention provides good value for money compared with alternatives (no intervention, usual care or different programme) or is even cost-saving. Although most studies did provide a description of the cost of the intervention programme, methodological details were often not displayed, and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention were not always included sufficiently. This review shows the different costing methodologies used in the current health economic literature and compares them with a theoretical framework. The high variability regarding the costs assessment and the lack of transparency concerning the methods limits the comparability of the results, which points out the need for a handy minimal dataset of cost assessment. Springer 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3402935/ /pubmed/22827967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wolfenstetter and Wenig; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Wolfenstetter, Silke B Wenig, Christina M Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title | Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title_full | Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title_short | Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
title_sort | costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolfenstettersilkeb costingofphysicalactivityprogrammesinprimarypreventionareviewoftheliterature AT wenigchristinam costingofphysicalactivityprogrammesinprimarypreventionareviewoftheliterature |