Cargando…

Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature

This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolfenstetter, Silke B, Wenig, Christina M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17
_version_ 1782238807769219072
author Wolfenstetter, Silke B
Wenig, Christina M
author_facet Wolfenstetter, Silke B
Wenig, Christina M
author_sort Wolfenstetter, Silke B
collection PubMed
description This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for decision making. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies published before December 2009. All studies were analysed regarding their key economic findings and their costing methodology. In summary, 18 international economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes were identified. Many of these studies conclude that the investigated intervention provides good value for money compared with alternatives (no intervention, usual care or different programme) or is even cost-saving. Although most studies did provide a description of the cost of the intervention programme, methodological details were often not displayed, and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention were not always included sufficiently. This review shows the different costing methodologies used in the current health economic literature and compares them with a theoretical framework. The high variability regarding the costs assessment and the lack of transparency concerning the methods limits the comparability of the results, which points out the need for a handy minimal dataset of cost assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34029352012-07-25 Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature Wolfenstetter, Silke B Wenig, Christina M Health Econ Rev Review This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for decision making. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies published before December 2009. All studies were analysed regarding their key economic findings and their costing methodology. In summary, 18 international economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes were identified. Many of these studies conclude that the investigated intervention provides good value for money compared with alternatives (no intervention, usual care or different programme) or is even cost-saving. Although most studies did provide a description of the cost of the intervention programme, methodological details were often not displayed, and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention were not always included sufficiently. This review shows the different costing methodologies used in the current health economic literature and compares them with a theoretical framework. The high variability regarding the costs assessment and the lack of transparency concerning the methods limits the comparability of the results, which points out the need for a handy minimal dataset of cost assessment. Springer 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3402935/ /pubmed/22827967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wolfenstetter and Wenig; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Wolfenstetter, Silke B
Wenig, Christina M
Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title_full Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title_short Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
title_sort costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-17
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfenstettersilkeb costingofphysicalactivityprogrammesinprimarypreventionareviewoftheliterature
AT wenigchristinam costingofphysicalactivityprogrammesinprimarypreventionareviewoftheliterature