Cargando…

Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants and therefore the goal is to avoid or minimize its use. To date there is very little consensus on what is considered the "best non-invasive ventilation mode" to be used post-extubation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Brien, Karel, Campbell, Craig, Brown, Leanne, Wenger, Lisa, Shah, Vibhuti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22475409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-43
_version_ 1782238817421361152
author O'Brien, Karel
Campbell, Craig
Brown, Leanne
Wenger, Lisa
Shah, Vibhuti
author_facet O'Brien, Karel
Campbell, Craig
Brown, Leanne
Wenger, Lisa
Shah, Vibhuti
author_sort O'Brien, Karel
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants and therefore the goal is to avoid or minimize its use. To date there is very little consensus on what is considered the "best non-invasive ventilation mode" to be used post-extubation. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vs. NCPAP in facilitating sustained extubation in infants ≤ 1,250 grams. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial of BP-NCPAP vs. NCPAP in infants ≤ 1,250 grams extubated for the first time following mechanical ventilation since birth. Infants were extubated using preset criteria or at the discretion of the attending neonatologist. The primary outcome was the incidence of sustained extubation for 7 days. Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse events and short-term neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven infants received BP-NCPAP and 69 NCPAP. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The trial was stopped early due to increased use of non-invasive ventilation from birth, falling short of our calculated sample size of 141 infants per group. The incidence of sustained extubation was not statistically different between the BP-NCPAP vs. NCPAP group (67% vs. 58%, P = 0.27). The incidence of adverse events and short-term neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05) except for retinopathy of prematurity which was noted to be higher (P = 0.02) in the BP-NCPAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic NCPAP may be used to assist in weaning from mechanical ventilation. The effectiveness and safety of BP-NCPAP compared to NCPAP needs to be confirmed in a large multi-center trial as our study conclusions are limited by inadequate sample size. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION #: NCT00308789 SOURCE OF SUPPORT: Grant # 06-06, Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, Toronto, Canada. Summit technologies Inc. provided additional NCPAP systems and an unrestricted educational grant. Abstract presented at The Society for Pediatric Research Meeting, Baltimore, USA, May 2nd-5(th), 2009 and Canadian Paediatric Society Meeting, June 23(rd)-29(th), Ottawa, 2009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34029792012-07-25 Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial O'Brien, Karel Campbell, Craig Brown, Leanne Wenger, Lisa Shah, Vibhuti BMC Pediatr Research Article ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants and therefore the goal is to avoid or minimize its use. To date there is very little consensus on what is considered the "best non-invasive ventilation mode" to be used post-extubation. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vs. NCPAP in facilitating sustained extubation in infants ≤ 1,250 grams. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial of BP-NCPAP vs. NCPAP in infants ≤ 1,250 grams extubated for the first time following mechanical ventilation since birth. Infants were extubated using preset criteria or at the discretion of the attending neonatologist. The primary outcome was the incidence of sustained extubation for 7 days. Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse events and short-term neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven infants received BP-NCPAP and 69 NCPAP. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The trial was stopped early due to increased use of non-invasive ventilation from birth, falling short of our calculated sample size of 141 infants per group. The incidence of sustained extubation was not statistically different between the BP-NCPAP vs. NCPAP group (67% vs. 58%, P = 0.27). The incidence of adverse events and short-term neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05) except for retinopathy of prematurity which was noted to be higher (P = 0.02) in the BP-NCPAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic NCPAP may be used to assist in weaning from mechanical ventilation. The effectiveness and safety of BP-NCPAP compared to NCPAP needs to be confirmed in a large multi-center trial as our study conclusions are limited by inadequate sample size. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION #: NCT00308789 SOURCE OF SUPPORT: Grant # 06-06, Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, Toronto, Canada. Summit technologies Inc. provided additional NCPAP systems and an unrestricted educational grant. Abstract presented at The Society for Pediatric Research Meeting, Baltimore, USA, May 2nd-5(th), 2009 and Canadian Paediatric Society Meeting, June 23(rd)-29(th), Ottawa, 2009. BioMed Central 2012-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3402979/ /pubmed/22475409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-43 Text en Copyright ©2012 O'Brien et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
O'Brien, Karel
Campbell, Craig
Brown, Leanne
Wenger, Lisa
Shah, Vibhuti
Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (bp- ncpap) vs. infant flow ncpap for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22475409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-43
work_keys_str_mv AT obrienkarel infantflowbiphasicnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurebpncpapvsinfantflowncpapforthefacilitationofextubationininfants1250gramsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellcraig infantflowbiphasicnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurebpncpapvsinfantflowncpapforthefacilitationofextubationininfants1250gramsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brownleanne infantflowbiphasicnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurebpncpapvsinfantflowncpapforthefacilitationofextubationininfants1250gramsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wengerlisa infantflowbiphasicnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurebpncpapvsinfantflowncpapforthefacilitationofextubationininfants1250gramsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shahvibhuti infantflowbiphasicnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurebpncpapvsinfantflowncpapforthefacilitationofextubationininfants1250gramsarandomizedcontrolledtrial