Cargando…

A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways (CPs) are used to improve the outcomes of acute stroke, but their use in stroke care is questionable, because the evidence on their effectiveness is still inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether CPs improve the outcomes and the quality of care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panella, Massimiliano, Marchisio, Sara, Brambilla, Romeo, Vanhaecht, Kris, Di Stanislao, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3403956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22781160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-71
_version_ 1782238955957125120
author Panella, Massimiliano
Marchisio, Sara
Brambilla, Romeo
Vanhaecht, Kris
Di Stanislao, Francesco
author_facet Panella, Massimiliano
Marchisio, Sara
Brambilla, Romeo
Vanhaecht, Kris
Di Stanislao, Francesco
author_sort Panella, Massimiliano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways (CPs) are used to improve the outcomes of acute stroke, but their use in stroke care is questionable, because the evidence on their effectiveness is still inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether CPs improve the outcomes and the quality of care provided to patients after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This was a multicentre cluster-randomized trial, in which 14 hospitals were randomized to the CP arm or to the non intervention/usual care (UC) arm. Healthcare workers in the CP arm received 3 days of training in quality improvement of CPs and in use of a standardized package including information on evidence-based key interventions and indicators. Healthcare workers in the usual-care arm followed their standard procedures. The teams in the CP arm developed their CPs over a 6-month period. The primary end point was mortality. Secondary end points were: use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, implementation of organized care, length of stay, re-admission and institutionalization rates after discharge, dependency levels, and complication rates. RESULTS: Compared with the patients in the UC arm, the patients in the CP arm had a significantly lower risk of mortality at 7 days (OR = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.95) and significantly lower rates of adverse functional outcomes, expressed as the odds of not returning to pre-stroke functioning in their daily life (OR = 0.42; 95 CI 0.18 to 0.98). There was no significant effect on 30-day mortality. Compared with the UC arm, the hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed more appropriately in the CP arm, and the evidence-based key interventions and organized care were more applied in the CP arm. CONCLUSIONS: CPs can significantly improve the outcomes of patients with ischemic patients with stroke, indicating better application of evidence-based key interventions and of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This study tested a new hypothesis and provided evidence on how CPs can work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: [NCT00673491].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3403956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34039562012-07-25 A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study Panella, Massimiliano Marchisio, Sara Brambilla, Romeo Vanhaecht, Kris Di Stanislao, Francesco BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways (CPs) are used to improve the outcomes of acute stroke, but their use in stroke care is questionable, because the evidence on their effectiveness is still inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether CPs improve the outcomes and the quality of care provided to patients after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This was a multicentre cluster-randomized trial, in which 14 hospitals were randomized to the CP arm or to the non intervention/usual care (UC) arm. Healthcare workers in the CP arm received 3 days of training in quality improvement of CPs and in use of a standardized package including information on evidence-based key interventions and indicators. Healthcare workers in the usual-care arm followed their standard procedures. The teams in the CP arm developed their CPs over a 6-month period. The primary end point was mortality. Secondary end points were: use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, implementation of organized care, length of stay, re-admission and institutionalization rates after discharge, dependency levels, and complication rates. RESULTS: Compared with the patients in the UC arm, the patients in the CP arm had a significantly lower risk of mortality at 7 days (OR = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.95) and significantly lower rates of adverse functional outcomes, expressed as the odds of not returning to pre-stroke functioning in their daily life (OR = 0.42; 95 CI 0.18 to 0.98). There was no significant effect on 30-day mortality. Compared with the UC arm, the hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed more appropriately in the CP arm, and the evidence-based key interventions and organized care were more applied in the CP arm. CONCLUSIONS: CPs can significantly improve the outcomes of patients with ischemic patients with stroke, indicating better application of evidence-based key interventions and of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This study tested a new hypothesis and provided evidence on how CPs can work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: [NCT00673491]. BioMed Central 2012-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3403956/ /pubmed/22781160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-71 Text en Copyright ©2012 Panella et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Panella, Massimiliano
Marchisio, Sara
Brambilla, Romeo
Vanhaecht, Kris
Di Stanislao, Francesco
A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title_full A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title_fullStr A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title_full_unstemmed A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title_short A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
title_sort cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3403956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22781160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-71
work_keys_str_mv AT panellamassimiliano aclusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT marchisiosara aclusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT brambillaromeo aclusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT vanhaechtkris aclusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT distanislaofrancesco aclusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT panellamassimiliano clusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT marchisiosara clusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT brambillaromeo clusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT vanhaechtkris clusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy
AT distanislaofrancesco clusterrandomizedtrialtoassesstheeffectofclinicalpathwaysforpatientswithstrokeresultsoftheclinicalpathwaysforeffectiveandappropriatecarestudy