Cargando…

Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton

Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), anti-cancer drugs that target established tumor blood vessels, fall into two main classes: microtubule targeting drugs, exemplified by combretastatin A4 (CA4), and flavonoids, exemplified by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Both classes increase permea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sujeong, Peshkin, Leonid, Mitchison, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040177
_version_ 1782238987910381568
author Kim, Sujeong
Peshkin, Leonid
Mitchison, Timothy J.
author_facet Kim, Sujeong
Peshkin, Leonid
Mitchison, Timothy J.
author_sort Kim, Sujeong
collection PubMed
description Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), anti-cancer drugs that target established tumor blood vessels, fall into two main classes: microtubule targeting drugs, exemplified by combretastatin A4 (CA4), and flavonoids, exemplified by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Both classes increase permeability of tumor vasculature in mouse models, and DMXAA in particular can cause massive tumor necrosis. The molecular target of CA4 is clearly microtubules. The molecular target(s) of DMXAA remains unclear. It is thought to promote inflammatory signaling in leukocytes, and has been assumed to not target microtubules, though it is not clear from the literature how carefully this assumption has been tested. An earlier flavone analog, flavone acetic acid, was reported to promote mitotic arrest suggesting flavones might possess anti-microtubule activity, and endothelial cells are sensitive to even mild disruption of microtubules. We carefully investigated whether DMXAA directly affects the microtubule or actin cytoskeletons of endothelial cells by comparing effects of CA4 and DMXAA on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) using time-lapse imaging and assays for cytoskeleton integrity. CA4 caused retraction of the cell margin, mitotic arrest and microtubule depolymerization, while DMXAA, up to 500 µM, showed none of these effects. DMXAA also had no effect on pure tubulin nucleation and polymerization, unlike CA4. We conclude that DMXAA exhibits no direct anti-microtubule action and thus cleanly differs from CA4 in its mechanism of action at the molecular level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3404093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34040932012-07-30 Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton Kim, Sujeong Peshkin, Leonid Mitchison, Timothy J. PLoS One Research Article Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), anti-cancer drugs that target established tumor blood vessels, fall into two main classes: microtubule targeting drugs, exemplified by combretastatin A4 (CA4), and flavonoids, exemplified by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Both classes increase permeability of tumor vasculature in mouse models, and DMXAA in particular can cause massive tumor necrosis. The molecular target of CA4 is clearly microtubules. The molecular target(s) of DMXAA remains unclear. It is thought to promote inflammatory signaling in leukocytes, and has been assumed to not target microtubules, though it is not clear from the literature how carefully this assumption has been tested. An earlier flavone analog, flavone acetic acid, was reported to promote mitotic arrest suggesting flavones might possess anti-microtubule activity, and endothelial cells are sensitive to even mild disruption of microtubules. We carefully investigated whether DMXAA directly affects the microtubule or actin cytoskeletons of endothelial cells by comparing effects of CA4 and DMXAA on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) using time-lapse imaging and assays for cytoskeleton integrity. CA4 caused retraction of the cell margin, mitotic arrest and microtubule depolymerization, while DMXAA, up to 500 µM, showed none of these effects. DMXAA also had no effect on pure tubulin nucleation and polymerization, unlike CA4. We conclude that DMXAA exhibits no direct anti-microtubule action and thus cleanly differs from CA4 in its mechanism of action at the molecular level. Public Library of Science 2012-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3404093/ /pubmed/22848372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040177 Text en Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Sujeong
Peshkin, Leonid
Mitchison, Timothy J.
Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title_full Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title_fullStr Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title_full_unstemmed Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title_short Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
title_sort vascular disrupting agent drug classes differ in effects on the cytoskeleton
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040177
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsujeong vasculardisruptingagentdrugclassesdifferineffectsonthecytoskeleton
AT peshkinleonid vasculardisruptingagentdrugclassesdifferineffectsonthecytoskeleton
AT mitchisontimothyj vasculardisruptingagentdrugclassesdifferineffectsonthecytoskeleton