Cargando…
Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks
The DF-4 connector is a novel industry standard for the connection of a defibrillator lead to the generator. It aims at reducing the bulk created by two or three pins at the proximal end of the defibrillator lead and its corresponding ports at the header of the device. Having only one connection por...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22389420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus034 |
_version_ | 1782239020516900864 |
---|---|
author | Sticherling, Christian Burri, Haran |
author_facet | Sticherling, Christian Burri, Haran |
author_sort | Sticherling, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The DF-4 connector is a novel industry standard for the connection of a defibrillator lead to the generator. It aims at reducing the bulk created by two or three pins at the proximal end of the defibrillator lead and its corresponding ports at the header of the device. Having only one connection port between the lead and the device reduces the material in the pocket, the risk of lead-to-port mismatch, may lower the risk of lead abrasion, and probably makes the implantation procedure a little easier since only one set screw is required. However, all these conceived benefits are related to convenience rather than to a medical need. After the recent experiences with the possible negative clinical impact of ‘minor’ changes like simply downsizing a defibrillator lead, a word of caution is warranted. The lead is the weakest part of the defibrillator system, complex in design and undergoing constant stress through movement. It is very hard to predict which issues may evolve over time with the changes in lead design. Does the perceived benefit really outweigh an unpredictable risk in a sensitive medical product like a defibrillator? This article tries to address the possible issues of the new spring contacts instead of set screws, the proximity of the low- and high-voltage connections as well as the inability of adding a pace/sense or an additional shock lead without a special adaptor, and advocates a measured speed in the introduction of this technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3404557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34045572012-07-25 Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks Sticherling, Christian Burri, Haran Europace Reviews The DF-4 connector is a novel industry standard for the connection of a defibrillator lead to the generator. It aims at reducing the bulk created by two or three pins at the proximal end of the defibrillator lead and its corresponding ports at the header of the device. Having only one connection port between the lead and the device reduces the material in the pocket, the risk of lead-to-port mismatch, may lower the risk of lead abrasion, and probably makes the implantation procedure a little easier since only one set screw is required. However, all these conceived benefits are related to convenience rather than to a medical need. After the recent experiences with the possible negative clinical impact of ‘minor’ changes like simply downsizing a defibrillator lead, a word of caution is warranted. The lead is the weakest part of the defibrillator system, complex in design and undergoing constant stress through movement. It is very hard to predict which issues may evolve over time with the changes in lead design. Does the perceived benefit really outweigh an unpredictable risk in a sensitive medical product like a defibrillator? This article tries to address the possible issues of the new spring contacts instead of set screws, the proximity of the low- and high-voltage connections as well as the inability of adding a pace/sense or an additional shock lead without a special adaptor, and advocates a measured speed in the introduction of this technology. Oxford University Press 2012-08 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3404557/ /pubmed/22389420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus034 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2012. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Sticherling, Christian Burri, Haran Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title | Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title_full | Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title_fullStr | Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title_short | Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
title_sort | introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22389420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sticherlingchristian introductionofnewindustrystandardsforcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesbalancingbenefitsandunexpectedrisks AT burriharan introductionofnewindustrystandardsforcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesbalancingbenefitsandunexpectedrisks |