Cargando…
Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of sh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605 |
_version_ | 1782239053362495488 |
---|---|
author | Wueringer, Barbara E. Jnr, Lyle Squire Kajiura, Stephen M. Tibbetts, Ian R. Hart, Nathan S. Collin, Shaun P. |
author_facet | Wueringer, Barbara E. Jnr, Lyle Squire Kajiura, Stephen M. Tibbetts, Ian R. Hart, Nathan S. Collin, Shaun P. |
author_sort | Wueringer, Barbara E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of shovelnose rays, Glaucostegus typus and Aptychotrema rostrata were tested for their reactions towards weak artificial electric dipole fields. The comparison of sawfishes and shovelnose rays sheds light on the evolution and function of the elongated rostrum (‘saw’) of sawfish, as both groups evolved from a shovelnose ray-like ancestor. Electric stimuli were presented both on the substrate (to mimic benthic prey) and suspended in the water column (to mimic free-swimming prey). Analysis of around 480 behavioural sequences shows that all three species are highly sensitive towards weak electric dipole fields, and initiate behavioural responses at median field strengths between 5.15 and 79.6 nVcm(−1). The response behaviours used by sawfish and shovelnose rays depended on the location of the dipoles. The elongation of the sawfish’s rostrum clearly expanded their electroreceptive search area into the water column and enables them to target free-swimming prey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3404968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34049682012-07-30 Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays Wueringer, Barbara E. Jnr, Lyle Squire Kajiura, Stephen M. Tibbetts, Ian R. Hart, Nathan S. Collin, Shaun P. PLoS One Research Article In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of shovelnose rays, Glaucostegus typus and Aptychotrema rostrata were tested for their reactions towards weak artificial electric dipole fields. The comparison of sawfishes and shovelnose rays sheds light on the evolution and function of the elongated rostrum (‘saw’) of sawfish, as both groups evolved from a shovelnose ray-like ancestor. Electric stimuli were presented both on the substrate (to mimic benthic prey) and suspended in the water column (to mimic free-swimming prey). Analysis of around 480 behavioural sequences shows that all three species are highly sensitive towards weak electric dipole fields, and initiate behavioural responses at median field strengths between 5.15 and 79.6 nVcm(−1). The response behaviours used by sawfish and shovelnose rays depended on the location of the dipoles. The elongation of the sawfish’s rostrum clearly expanded their electroreceptive search area into the water column and enables them to target free-swimming prey. Public Library of Science 2012-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3404968/ /pubmed/22848543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605 Text en © 2012 Wueringer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wueringer, Barbara E. Jnr, Lyle Squire Kajiura, Stephen M. Tibbetts, Ian R. Hart, Nathan S. Collin, Shaun P. Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title | Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title_full | Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title_fullStr | Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title_full_unstemmed | Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title_short | Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays |
title_sort | electric field detection in sawfish and shovelnose rays |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wueringerbarbarae electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays AT jnrlylesquire electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays AT kajiurastephenm electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays AT tibbettsianr electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays AT hartnathans electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays AT collinshaunp electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays |