Cargando…

Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays

In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wueringer, Barbara E., Jnr, Lyle Squire, Kajiura, Stephen M., Tibbetts, Ian R., Hart, Nathan S., Collin, Shaun P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605
_version_ 1782239053362495488
author Wueringer, Barbara E.
Jnr, Lyle Squire
Kajiura, Stephen M.
Tibbetts, Ian R.
Hart, Nathan S.
Collin, Shaun P.
author_facet Wueringer, Barbara E.
Jnr, Lyle Squire
Kajiura, Stephen M.
Tibbetts, Ian R.
Hart, Nathan S.
Collin, Shaun P.
author_sort Wueringer, Barbara E.
collection PubMed
description In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of shovelnose rays, Glaucostegus typus and Aptychotrema rostrata were tested for their reactions towards weak artificial electric dipole fields. The comparison of sawfishes and shovelnose rays sheds light on the evolution and function of the elongated rostrum (‘saw’) of sawfish, as both groups evolved from a shovelnose ray-like ancestor. Electric stimuli were presented both on the substrate (to mimic benthic prey) and suspended in the water column (to mimic free-swimming prey). Analysis of around 480 behavioural sequences shows that all three species are highly sensitive towards weak electric dipole fields, and initiate behavioural responses at median field strengths between 5.15 and 79.6 nVcm(−1). The response behaviours used by sawfish and shovelnose rays depended on the location of the dipoles. The elongation of the sawfish’s rostrum clearly expanded their electroreceptive search area into the water column and enables them to target free-swimming prey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3404968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34049682012-07-30 Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays Wueringer, Barbara E. Jnr, Lyle Squire Kajiura, Stephen M. Tibbetts, Ian R. Hart, Nathan S. Collin, Shaun P. PLoS One Research Article In the aquatic environment, living organisms emit weak dipole electric fields, which spread in the surrounding water. Elasmobranchs detect these dipole electric fields with their highly sensitive electroreceptors, the ampullae of Lorenzini. Freshwater sawfish, Pristis microdon, and two species of shovelnose rays, Glaucostegus typus and Aptychotrema rostrata were tested for their reactions towards weak artificial electric dipole fields. The comparison of sawfishes and shovelnose rays sheds light on the evolution and function of the elongated rostrum (‘saw’) of sawfish, as both groups evolved from a shovelnose ray-like ancestor. Electric stimuli were presented both on the substrate (to mimic benthic prey) and suspended in the water column (to mimic free-swimming prey). Analysis of around 480 behavioural sequences shows that all three species are highly sensitive towards weak electric dipole fields, and initiate behavioural responses at median field strengths between 5.15 and 79.6 nVcm(−1). The response behaviours used by sawfish and shovelnose rays depended on the location of the dipoles. The elongation of the sawfish’s rostrum clearly expanded their electroreceptive search area into the water column and enables them to target free-swimming prey. Public Library of Science 2012-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3404968/ /pubmed/22848543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605 Text en © 2012 Wueringer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wueringer, Barbara E.
Jnr, Lyle Squire
Kajiura, Stephen M.
Tibbetts, Ian R.
Hart, Nathan S.
Collin, Shaun P.
Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title_full Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title_fullStr Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title_full_unstemmed Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title_short Electric Field Detection in Sawfish and Shovelnose Rays
title_sort electric field detection in sawfish and shovelnose rays
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041605
work_keys_str_mv AT wueringerbarbarae electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays
AT jnrlylesquire electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays
AT kajiurastephenm electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays
AT tibbettsianr electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays
AT hartnathans electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays
AT collinshaunp electricfielddetectioninsawfishandshovelnoserays