Cargando…

Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)

BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leiva-Fernández, Francisca, Leiva-Fernández, José, Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando, García-Ruiz, Antonio, Prados-Torres, Daniel, Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64
_version_ 1782239056314236928
author Leiva-Fernández, Francisca
Leiva-Fernández, José
Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando
García-Ruiz, Antonio
Prados-Torres, Daniel
Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar
author_facet Leiva-Fernández, Francisca
Leiva-Fernández, José
Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando
García-Ruiz, Antonio
Prados-Torres, Daniel
Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar
author_sort Leiva-Fernández, Francisca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor inhaler technique instruction. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of two educational interventions to improve the inhalation techniques in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). METHODS: This study uses both a multicenter patients´ preference trial and a comprehensive cohort design with 495 COPD-diagnosed patients selected by a non-probabilistic method of sampling from seven Primary Care Centers. The participants will be divided into two groups and five arms. The two groups are: 1) the patients´ preference group with two arms and 2) the randomized group with three arms. In the preference group, the two arms correspond to the two educational interventions (Intervention A and Intervention B) designed for this study. In the randomized group the three arms comprise: intervention A, intervention B and a control arm. Intervention A is written information (a leaflet describing the correct inhalation techniques). Intervention B is written information about inhalation techniques plus training by an instructor. Every patient in each group will be visited six times during the year of the study at health care center. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that the application of two educational interventions in patients with COPD who are treated with inhaled therapy will increase the number of patients who perform a correct inhalation technique by at least 25 %. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on patient inhalation technique improvement, considering that it will be adequate and feasible within the context of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRTCTN15106246
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3404981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34049812012-07-26 Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) Leiva-Fernández, Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando García-Ruiz, Antonio Prados-Torres, Daniel Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor inhaler technique instruction. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of two educational interventions to improve the inhalation techniques in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). METHODS: This study uses both a multicenter patients´ preference trial and a comprehensive cohort design with 495 COPD-diagnosed patients selected by a non-probabilistic method of sampling from seven Primary Care Centers. The participants will be divided into two groups and five arms. The two groups are: 1) the patients´ preference group with two arms and 2) the randomized group with three arms. In the preference group, the two arms correspond to the two educational interventions (Intervention A and Intervention B) designed for this study. In the randomized group the three arms comprise: intervention A, intervention B and a control arm. Intervention A is written information (a leaflet describing the correct inhalation techniques). Intervention B is written information about inhalation techniques plus training by an instructor. Every patient in each group will be visited six times during the year of the study at health care center. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that the application of two educational interventions in patients with COPD who are treated with inhaled therapy will increase the number of patients who perform a correct inhalation technique by at least 25 %. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on patient inhalation technique improvement, considering that it will be adequate and feasible within the context of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRTCTN15106246 BioMed Central 2012-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3404981/ /pubmed/22613015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64 Text en Copyright ©2012 Leiva-Fernández et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Leiva-Fernández, Francisca
Leiva-Fernández, José
Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando
García-Ruiz, Antonio
Prados-Torres, Daniel
Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar
Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title_full Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title_fullStr Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title_short Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
title_sort efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd). tecepoc: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64
work_keys_str_mv AT leivafernandezfrancisca efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial
AT leivafernandezjose efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial
AT zubeldiasantoyofernando efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial
AT garciaruizantonio efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial
AT pradostorresdaniel efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial
AT barnesteinfonsecapilar efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial