Cargando…
Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial)
BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64 |
_version_ | 1782239056314236928 |
---|---|
author | Leiva-Fernández, Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando García-Ruiz, Antonio Prados-Torres, Daniel Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar |
author_facet | Leiva-Fernández, Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando García-Ruiz, Antonio Prados-Torres, Daniel Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar |
author_sort | Leiva-Fernández, Francisca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor inhaler technique instruction. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of two educational interventions to improve the inhalation techniques in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). METHODS: This study uses both a multicenter patients´ preference trial and a comprehensive cohort design with 495 COPD-diagnosed patients selected by a non-probabilistic method of sampling from seven Primary Care Centers. The participants will be divided into two groups and five arms. The two groups are: 1) the patients´ preference group with two arms and 2) the randomized group with three arms. In the preference group, the two arms correspond to the two educational interventions (Intervention A and Intervention B) designed for this study. In the randomized group the three arms comprise: intervention A, intervention B and a control arm. Intervention A is written information (a leaflet describing the correct inhalation techniques). Intervention B is written information about inhalation techniques plus training by an instructor. Every patient in each group will be visited six times during the year of the study at health care center. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that the application of two educational interventions in patients with COPD who are treated with inhaled therapy will increase the number of patients who perform a correct inhalation technique by at least 25 %. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on patient inhalation technique improvement, considering that it will be adequate and feasible within the context of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRTCTN15106246 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3404981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34049812012-07-26 Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) Leiva-Fernández, Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando García-Ruiz, Antonio Prados-Torres, Daniel Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Drugs for inhalation are the cornerstone of therapy in obstructive lung disease. We have observed that up to 75 % of patients do not perform a correct inhalation technique. The inability of patients to correctly use their inhaler device may be a direct consequence of insufficient or poor inhaler technique instruction. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of two educational interventions to improve the inhalation techniques in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). METHODS: This study uses both a multicenter patients´ preference trial and a comprehensive cohort design with 495 COPD-diagnosed patients selected by a non-probabilistic method of sampling from seven Primary Care Centers. The participants will be divided into two groups and five arms. The two groups are: 1) the patients´ preference group with two arms and 2) the randomized group with three arms. In the preference group, the two arms correspond to the two educational interventions (Intervention A and Intervention B) designed for this study. In the randomized group the three arms comprise: intervention A, intervention B and a control arm. Intervention A is written information (a leaflet describing the correct inhalation techniques). Intervention B is written information about inhalation techniques plus training by an instructor. Every patient in each group will be visited six times during the year of the study at health care center. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that the application of two educational interventions in patients with COPD who are treated with inhaled therapy will increase the number of patients who perform a correct inhalation technique by at least 25 %. We will evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on patient inhalation technique improvement, considering that it will be adequate and feasible within the context of clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRTCTN15106246 BioMed Central 2012-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3404981/ /pubmed/22613015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64 Text en Copyright ©2012 Leiva-Fernández et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Leiva-Fernández, Francisca Leiva-Fernández, José Zubeldia-Santoyo, Fernando García-Ruiz, Antonio Prados-Torres, Daniel Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title | Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title_full | Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title_short | Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
title_sort | efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd). tecepoc: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leivafernandezfrancisca efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial AT leivafernandezjose efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial AT zubeldiasantoyofernando efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial AT garciaruizantonio efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial AT pradostorresdaniel efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial AT barnesteinfonsecapilar efficacyoftwoeducationalinterventionsaboutinhalationtechniquesinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdtecepocstudyprotocolforapartiallyrandomizedcontrolledtrialpreferencetrial |