Cargando…
Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics?
This paper maps the ethical issues that arise in the context of personalised medicine. First, it highlights the ethical problems related to increased predictive power of modern diagnostic interventions. Such problems emerge because the ability to identify individuals or groups of individuals that ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23199143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13167-011-0078-x |
_version_ | 1782239124605894656 |
---|---|
author | Gefenas, Eugenijus Cekanauskaite, Asta Tuzaite, Egle Dranseika, Vilius Characiejus, Dainius |
author_facet | Gefenas, Eugenijus Cekanauskaite, Asta Tuzaite, Egle Dranseika, Vilius Characiejus, Dainius |
author_sort | Gefenas, Eugenijus |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper maps the ethical issues that arise in the context of personalised medicine. First, it highlights the ethical problems related to increased predictive power of modern diagnostic interventions. Such problems emerge because the ability to identify individuals or groups of individuals that can potentially benefit from a particular therapeutic intervention also raises a question of personal responsibility for health-related behaviour and lifestyle. The second major area of ethical concern is related to health prevention and distributive justice. The paper discusses the ethical challenges brought by the personalised medicine in the context of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes. Finally, it notes that the issue of consent in the context of biobanks, the need to rethink the prevalent models of research designs and to communicate relevant findings to the donors of biological materials deserve further discussion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3405379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34053792012-07-27 Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? Gefenas, Eugenijus Cekanauskaite, Asta Tuzaite, Egle Dranseika, Vilius Characiejus, Dainius EPMA J Review Article This paper maps the ethical issues that arise in the context of personalised medicine. First, it highlights the ethical problems related to increased predictive power of modern diagnostic interventions. Such problems emerge because the ability to identify individuals or groups of individuals that can potentially benefit from a particular therapeutic intervention also raises a question of personal responsibility for health-related behaviour and lifestyle. The second major area of ethical concern is related to health prevention and distributive justice. The paper discusses the ethical challenges brought by the personalised medicine in the context of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes. Finally, it notes that the issue of consent in the context of biobanks, the need to rethink the prevalent models of research designs and to communicate relevant findings to the donors of biological materials deserve further discussion. Springer Netherlands 2011-04-20 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3405379/ /pubmed/23199143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13167-011-0078-x Text en © European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine 2011 |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gefenas, Eugenijus Cekanauskaite, Asta Tuzaite, Egle Dranseika, Vilius Characiejus, Dainius Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title | Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title_full | Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title_fullStr | Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title_short | Does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
title_sort | does the “new philosophy” in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine require new ethics? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23199143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13167-011-0078-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gefenaseugenijus doesthenewphilosophyinpredictivepreventiveandpersonalisedmedicinerequirenewethics AT cekanauskaiteasta doesthenewphilosophyinpredictivepreventiveandpersonalisedmedicinerequirenewethics AT tuzaiteegle doesthenewphilosophyinpredictivepreventiveandpersonalisedmedicinerequirenewethics AT dranseikavilius doesthenewphilosophyinpredictivepreventiveandpersonalisedmedicinerequirenewethics AT characiejusdainius doesthenewphilosophyinpredictivepreventiveandpersonalisedmedicinerequirenewethics |