Cargando…

Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data

The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydin, Denis, Feychting, Maria, Schüz, Joachim, Röösli, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35
_version_ 1782239132975628288
author Aydin, Denis
Feychting, Maria
Schüz, Joachim
Röösli, Martin
author_facet Aydin, Denis
Feychting, Maria
Schüz, Joachim
Röösli, Martin
author_sort Aydin, Denis
collection PubMed
description The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wireless phone use. In this article, we respond and show why consistency checks of case–control study results with observed time trends of incidence rates are essential, given the well described limitations of case–control studies and the steep increase of mobile phone use among children and adolescents during the last decade. There is no plausible explanation of how a notably increased risk from use of wireless phones would correspond to the relatively stable incidence time trends for brain tumours among children and adolescents observed in the Nordic countries. Nevertheless, an increased risk restricted to heavy mobile phone use, to very early life exposure, or to rare subtypes of brain tumours may be compatible with stable incidence trends at this time and thus further monitoring of childhood brain tumour incidence rate time trends is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3405416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34054162012-07-27 Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data Aydin, Denis Feychting, Maria Schüz, Joachim Röösli, Martin Environ Health Commentary The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wireless phone use. In this article, we respond and show why consistency checks of case–control study results with observed time trends of incidence rates are essential, given the well described limitations of case–control studies and the steep increase of mobile phone use among children and adolescents during the last decade. There is no plausible explanation of how a notably increased risk from use of wireless phones would correspond to the relatively stable incidence time trends for brain tumours among children and adolescents observed in the Nordic countries. Nevertheless, an increased risk restricted to heavy mobile phone use, to very early life exposure, or to rare subtypes of brain tumours may be compatible with stable incidence trends at this time and thus further monitoring of childhood brain tumour incidence rate time trends is warranted. BioMed Central 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3405416/ /pubmed/22607537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35 Text en Copyright ©2012 Aydin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Aydin, Denis
Feychting, Maria
Schüz, Joachim
Röösli, Martin
Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title_full Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title_fullStr Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title_full_unstemmed Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title_short Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
title_sort childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35
work_keys_str_mv AT aydindenis childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata
AT feychtingmaria childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata
AT schuzjoachim childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata
AT rooslimartin childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata