Cargando…
Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data
The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wir...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35 |
_version_ | 1782239132975628288 |
---|---|
author | Aydin, Denis Feychting, Maria Schüz, Joachim Röösli, Martin |
author_facet | Aydin, Denis Feychting, Maria Schüz, Joachim Röösli, Martin |
author_sort | Aydin, Denis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wireless phone use. In this article, we respond and show why consistency checks of case–control study results with observed time trends of incidence rates are essential, given the well described limitations of case–control studies and the steep increase of mobile phone use among children and adolescents during the last decade. There is no plausible explanation of how a notably increased risk from use of wireless phones would correspond to the relatively stable incidence time trends for brain tumours among children and adolescents observed in the Nordic countries. Nevertheless, an increased risk restricted to heavy mobile phone use, to very early life exposure, or to rare subtypes of brain tumours may be compatible with stable incidence trends at this time and thus further monitoring of childhood brain tumour incidence rate time trends is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3405416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34054162012-07-27 Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data Aydin, Denis Feychting, Maria Schüz, Joachim Röösli, Martin Environ Health Commentary The first case–control study on mobile phone use and brain tumour risk among children and adolescents (CEFALO study) has recently been published. In a commentary published in Environmental Health, Söderqvist and colleagues argued that CEFALO suggests an increased brain tumour risk in relation to wireless phone use. In this article, we respond and show why consistency checks of case–control study results with observed time trends of incidence rates are essential, given the well described limitations of case–control studies and the steep increase of mobile phone use among children and adolescents during the last decade. There is no plausible explanation of how a notably increased risk from use of wireless phones would correspond to the relatively stable incidence time trends for brain tumours among children and adolescents observed in the Nordic countries. Nevertheless, an increased risk restricted to heavy mobile phone use, to very early life exposure, or to rare subtypes of brain tumours may be compatible with stable incidence trends at this time and thus further monitoring of childhood brain tumour incidence rate time trends is warranted. BioMed Central 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3405416/ /pubmed/22607537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35 Text en Copyright ©2012 Aydin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Aydin, Denis Feychting, Maria Schüz, Joachim Röösli, Martin Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title | Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title_full | Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title_fullStr | Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title_full_unstemmed | Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title_short | Childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
title_sort | childhood brain tumours and use of mobile phones: comparison of a case–control study with incidence data |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-35 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aydindenis childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata AT feychtingmaria childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata AT schuzjoachim childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata AT rooslimartin childhoodbraintumoursanduseofmobilephonescomparisonofacasecontrolstudywithincidencedata |