Cargando…

Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex

Humans can recognize spoken words with unmatched speed and accuracy. Hearing the initial portion of a word such as “formu…” is sufficient for the brain to identify “formula” from the thousands of other words that partially match [1–6]. Two alternative computational accounts propose that partially ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagnepain, Pierre, Henson, Richard N., Davis, Matthew H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.015
_version_ 1782239152538910720
author Gagnepain, Pierre
Henson, Richard N.
Davis, Matthew H.
author_facet Gagnepain, Pierre
Henson, Richard N.
Davis, Matthew H.
author_sort Gagnepain, Pierre
collection PubMed
description Humans can recognize spoken words with unmatched speed and accuracy. Hearing the initial portion of a word such as “formu…” is sufficient for the brain to identify “formula” from the thousands of other words that partially match [1–6]. Two alternative computational accounts propose that partially matching words (1) inhibit each other until a single word is selected (“formula” inhibits “formal” by lexical competition [7–9]) or (2) are used to predict upcoming speech sounds more accurately (segment prediction error is minimal after sequences like “formu…” [10–12]). To distinguish these theories we taught participants novel words (e.g., “formubo”) that sound like existing words (“formula”) on two successive days [13–16]. Computational simulations show that knowing “formubo” increases lexical competition when hearing “formu…”, but reduces segment prediction error. Conversely, when the sounds in “formula” and “formubo” diverge, the reverse is observed. The time course of magnetoencephalographic brain responses in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) is uniquely consistent with a segment prediction account. We propose a predictive coding model of spoken word recognition in which STG neurons represent the difference between predicted and heard speech sounds. This prediction error signal explains the efficiency of human word recognition and simulates neural responses in auditory regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3405519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34055192012-08-06 Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex Gagnepain, Pierre Henson, Richard N. Davis, Matthew H. Curr Biol Report Humans can recognize spoken words with unmatched speed and accuracy. Hearing the initial portion of a word such as “formu…” is sufficient for the brain to identify “formula” from the thousands of other words that partially match [1–6]. Two alternative computational accounts propose that partially matching words (1) inhibit each other until a single word is selected (“formula” inhibits “formal” by lexical competition [7–9]) or (2) are used to predict upcoming speech sounds more accurately (segment prediction error is minimal after sequences like “formu…” [10–12]). To distinguish these theories we taught participants novel words (e.g., “formubo”) that sound like existing words (“formula”) on two successive days [13–16]. Computational simulations show that knowing “formubo” increases lexical competition when hearing “formu…”, but reduces segment prediction error. Conversely, when the sounds in “formula” and “formubo” diverge, the reverse is observed. The time course of magnetoencephalographic brain responses in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) is uniquely consistent with a segment prediction account. We propose a predictive coding model of spoken word recognition in which STG neurons represent the difference between predicted and heard speech sounds. This prediction error signal explains the efficiency of human word recognition and simulates neural responses in auditory regions. Cell Press 2012-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3405519/ /pubmed/22425155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.015 Text en © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Report
Gagnepain, Pierre
Henson, Richard N.
Davis, Matthew H.
Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title_full Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title_fullStr Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title_short Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex
title_sort temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.015
work_keys_str_mv AT gagnepainpierre temporalpredictivecodesforspokenwordsinauditorycortex
AT hensonrichardn temporalpredictivecodesforspokenwordsinauditorycortex
AT davismatthewh temporalpredictivecodesforspokenwordsinauditorycortex