Cargando…

Reliability of the Peer-Review Process for Adverse Event Rating

BACKGROUND: Adverse events are poor patient outcomes caused by medical care. Their identification requires the peer-review of poor outcomes, which may be unreliable. Combining physician ratings might improve the accuracy of adverse event classification. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variation in peer-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Forster, Alan J., Taljaard, Monica, Bennett, Carol, van Walraven, Carl
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22844445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041239

Ejemplares similares

Does adding risk-trends to survival models improve in-hospital mortality predictions? A cohort study
por: Wong, Jenna, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The impact of adverse events in the intensive care unit on hospital mortality and length of stay
por: Forster, Alan J, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital
por: Forster, Alan J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The prevalence of potentially preventable deaths in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort
por: Kobewka, Daniel M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Procedural Index for Mortality Risk (PIMR): an index calculated using administrative data to quantify the independent influence of procedures on risk of hospital death
por: van Walraven, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effectiveness of a computerized drug-monitoring program to detect and prevent adverse drug events and medication non-adherence in outpatient ambulatory care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
por: Forster, Alan J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The use of quality indicators to promote accountability in health care: the good, the bad, and the ugly
por: Forster, Alan J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data
por: van Walraven, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Derivation and validation of a diagnostic score based on case-mix groups to predict 30-day death or urgent readmission
por: van Walraven, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A commentary on the value of hospital data for covid-19 pandemic surveillance and planning
por: Manuel, Douglas G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Using Medical Emergency Teams to detect preventable adverse events
por: Iyengar, Akshai, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Opening up Peer Review in Life: Towards a Transparent and Reliable Process
por: Rampelotto, Pabulo Henrique
Publicado: (2014)

Quality gaps identified through mortality review
por: Kobewka, Daniel M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing Reliability of Medical Record Reviews for the Detection of Hospital Adverse Events
por: Ock, Minsu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Derivation and Internal Validation of a Model to Predict the Probability of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infection in Community People
por: van Walraven, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review
por: Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2017)

The process of peer-review.
por: Twentyman, P., et al.
Publicado: (1991)

The peer review process
por: Tumin, Dmitry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali
Publicado: (2023)

Study of a multisite prospective adverse event surveillance system
por: Forster, Alan J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Case Mix, Patterns of Care, and Inpatient Outcomes Among Ontario Kidney Transplant Centers: A Population-Based Study
por: Tsampalieros, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Hospital Climate and Peer Report Intention on Adverse Medical Events: Role of Attribution and Rewards
por: Li, Xiaoxiang, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits
por: Calder, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Process of peer review continues
por: Dhammi, Ish Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer review and the publication process
por: Ali, Parveen Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Transparent Peer Review: A Look Inside the Peer Review Process
por: Garakyaraghi, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Effect of Transplant Volume and Patient Case Mix on Center Variation in Kidney Transplantation Outcomes
por: Tsampalieros, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Adverse Events following 12 and 18 Month Vaccinations: a Population-Based, Self-Controlled Case Series Analysis
por: Wilson, Kumanan, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006)

Improving the reliability of peer-reviewed publications: We are all in it together
por: Bustin, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training
por: Sattler, David N., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Peer Review of “Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method”
Publicado: (2021)

Peer Review of “Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method”
Publicado: (2021)

Peer Review of “Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method”
por: Yu, Haiyan
Publicado: (2021)

Peer Review of “Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method”
por: Antoniou, Mark
Publicado: (2021)

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports
por: Makarem, Adham, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring severe adverse events and medication selection using a “PEER Report” for nonpsychotic patients: a retrospective chart review
por: Hoffman, Daniel A, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study
por: McIsaac, Daniel I., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_garvr5h44o9prko9kmndv2ma60