Cargando…
Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery
Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, the promise of lower postoperative morbidity and improved cosmesis has been achieved. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) potentially takes this further. Following the first human urological LESS report in 2007, numerous case series have emerge...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.7.443 |
_version_ | 1782239208090370048 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Tae Hee |
author_facet | Oh, Tae Hee |
author_sort | Oh, Tae Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, the promise of lower postoperative morbidity and improved cosmesis has been achieved. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) potentially takes this further. Following the first human urological LESS report in 2007, numerous case series have emerged, as well as comparative studies comparing LESS with standard laparoscopy. However, comparative series between conventional laparoscopy and LESS for different procedures suggest a non-inferiority of LESS over standard laparoscopy, but the only objective benefit remains an improved cosmetic outcome. Challenging ergonomics, instrument clashing, lack of true triangulation, and in-line vision are the main concerns with LESS surgery. Various new instruments have been designed, but only experienced laparoscopists and well-selected patients are pivotal for a successful LESS procedure. Robotic-assisted LESS procedures have been performed. The available robotic platform remains bulky, but development of instrumentation and application of robotic technology are expected to define the actual role of these techniques in minimally invasive urologic surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3406188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34061882012-08-03 Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery Oh, Tae Hee Korean J Urol Review Article Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, the promise of lower postoperative morbidity and improved cosmesis has been achieved. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) potentially takes this further. Following the first human urological LESS report in 2007, numerous case series have emerged, as well as comparative studies comparing LESS with standard laparoscopy. However, comparative series between conventional laparoscopy and LESS for different procedures suggest a non-inferiority of LESS over standard laparoscopy, but the only objective benefit remains an improved cosmetic outcome. Challenging ergonomics, instrument clashing, lack of true triangulation, and in-line vision are the main concerns with LESS surgery. Various new instruments have been designed, but only experienced laparoscopists and well-selected patients are pivotal for a successful LESS procedure. Robotic-assisted LESS procedures have been performed. The available robotic platform remains bulky, but development of instrumentation and application of robotic technology are expected to define the actual role of these techniques in minimally invasive urologic surgery. The Korean Urological Association 2012-07 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3406188/ /pubmed/22866213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.7.443 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Oh, Tae Hee Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title | Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title_full | Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title_fullStr | Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title_short | Current Status of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Urologic Surgery |
title_sort | current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urologic surgery |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.7.443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohtaehee currentstatusoflaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryinurologicsurgery |