Cargando…

Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy

Abstract. Nomenclatural benchmarking is the periodic realignment of species names with species theories and is necessary for the accurate and uniform use of Linnaean binominals in the face of changing species limits. Gaining access to types, often for little more than a cursory examination by an exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheeler, Quentin, Bourgoin, Thierry, Coddington, Jonathan, Gostony, Timothy, Hamilton, Andrew, Larimer, Roy, Polaszek, Andrew, Schauff, Michael, Solis, M. Alma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.209.3486
_version_ 1782239230633705472
author Wheeler, Quentin
Bourgoin, Thierry
Coddington, Jonathan
Gostony, Timothy
Hamilton, Andrew
Larimer, Roy
Polaszek, Andrew
Schauff, Michael
Solis, M. Alma
author_facet Wheeler, Quentin
Bourgoin, Thierry
Coddington, Jonathan
Gostony, Timothy
Hamilton, Andrew
Larimer, Roy
Polaszek, Andrew
Schauff, Michael
Solis, M. Alma
author_sort Wheeler, Quentin
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Nomenclatural benchmarking is the periodic realignment of species names with species theories and is necessary for the accurate and uniform use of Linnaean binominals in the face of changing species limits. Gaining access to types, often for little more than a cursory examination by an expert, is a major bottleneck in the advance and availability of biodiversity informatics. For the nearly two million described species it has been estimated that five to six million name-bearing type specimens exist, including those for synonymized binominals. Recognizing that examination of types in person will remain necessary in special cases, we propose a four-part strategy for opening access to types that relies heavily on digitization and that would eliminate much of the bottleneck: (1) modify codes of nomenclature to create registries of nomenclatural acts, such as the proposed ZooBank, that include a requirement for digital representations (e-types) for all newly described species to avoid adding to backlog; (2) an “r” strategy that would engineer and deploy a network of automated instruments capable of rapidly creating 3-D images of type specimens not requiring participation of taxon experts; (3) a “K” strategy using remotely operable microscopes to engage taxon experts in targeting and annotating informative characters of types to supplement and extend information content of rapidly acquired e-types, a process that can be done on an as-needed basis as in the normal course of revisionary taxonomy; and (4) creation of a global e-type archive associated with the commissions on nomenclature and species registries providing one-stop-shopping for e-types. We describe a first generation implementation of the “K” strategy that adapts current technology to create a network of Remotely Operable Benchmarkers Of Types (ROBOT) specifically engineered to handle the largest backlog of types, pinned insect specimens. The three initial instruments will be in the Smithsonian Institution(Washington, DC), Natural History Museum (London), and Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris), networking the three largest insect collections in the world with entomologists worldwide. These three instruments make possible remote examination, manipulation, and photography of types for more than 600,000 species. This is a cybertaxonomy demonstration project that we anticipate will lead to similar instruments for a wide range of museum specimens and objects as well as revolutionary changes in collaborative taxonomy and formal and public taxonomic education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3406476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34064762012-08-02 Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy Wheeler, Quentin Bourgoin, Thierry Coddington, Jonathan Gostony, Timothy Hamilton, Andrew Larimer, Roy Polaszek, Andrew Schauff, Michael Solis, M. Alma Zookeys Article Abstract. Nomenclatural benchmarking is the periodic realignment of species names with species theories and is necessary for the accurate and uniform use of Linnaean binominals in the face of changing species limits. Gaining access to types, often for little more than a cursory examination by an expert, is a major bottleneck in the advance and availability of biodiversity informatics. For the nearly two million described species it has been estimated that five to six million name-bearing type specimens exist, including those for synonymized binominals. Recognizing that examination of types in person will remain necessary in special cases, we propose a four-part strategy for opening access to types that relies heavily on digitization and that would eliminate much of the bottleneck: (1) modify codes of nomenclature to create registries of nomenclatural acts, such as the proposed ZooBank, that include a requirement for digital representations (e-types) for all newly described species to avoid adding to backlog; (2) an “r” strategy that would engineer and deploy a network of automated instruments capable of rapidly creating 3-D images of type specimens not requiring participation of taxon experts; (3) a “K” strategy using remotely operable microscopes to engage taxon experts in targeting and annotating informative characters of types to supplement and extend information content of rapidly acquired e-types, a process that can be done on an as-needed basis as in the normal course of revisionary taxonomy; and (4) creation of a global e-type archive associated with the commissions on nomenclature and species registries providing one-stop-shopping for e-types. We describe a first generation implementation of the “K” strategy that adapts current technology to create a network of Remotely Operable Benchmarkers Of Types (ROBOT) specifically engineered to handle the largest backlog of types, pinned insect specimens. The three initial instruments will be in the Smithsonian Institution(Washington, DC), Natural History Museum (London), and Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris), networking the three largest insect collections in the world with entomologists worldwide. These three instruments make possible remote examination, manipulation, and photography of types for more than 600,000 species. This is a cybertaxonomy demonstration project that we anticipate will lead to similar instruments for a wide range of museum specimens and objects as well as revolutionary changes in collaborative taxonomy and formal and public taxonomic education. Pensoft Publishers 2012-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3406476/ /pubmed/22859888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.209.3486 Text en Quentin Wheeler, Thierry Bourgoin, Jonathan CoddingtonTimothy Gostony1, Andrew Hamilton, Roy Larimer, Andrew Polaszek, Michael Schauff, M. Alma Solis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Wheeler, Quentin
Bourgoin, Thierry
Coddington, Jonathan
Gostony, Timothy
Hamilton, Andrew
Larimer, Roy
Polaszek, Andrew
Schauff, Michael
Solis, M. Alma
Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title_full Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title_fullStr Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title_short Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
title_sort nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3406476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.209.3486
work_keys_str_mv AT wheelerquentin nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT bourgointhierry nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT coddingtonjonathan nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT gostonytimothy nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT hamiltonandrew nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT larimerroy nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT polaszekandrew nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT schauffmichael nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy
AT solismalma nomenclaturalbenchmarkingtherolesofdigitaltypificationandtelemicroscopy