Cargando…

Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groth, Stefan, Krause, Horst, Behrendt, Rainer, Hill, Helge, Börner, Michael, Bastürk, Murat, Plathner, Nora, Schütte, Friedrich, Gauger, Ulrich, Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand, Altenhofen, Lutz, Rösch, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80
_version_ 1782239271293288448
author Groth, Stefan
Krause, Horst
Behrendt, Rainer
Hill, Helge
Börner, Michael
Bastürk, Murat
Plathner, Nora
Schütte, Friedrich
Gauger, Ulrich
Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand
Altenhofen, Lutz
Rösch, Thomas
author_facet Groth, Stefan
Krause, Horst
Behrendt, Rainer
Hill, Helge
Börner, Michael
Bastürk, Murat
Plathner, Nora
Schütte, Friedrich
Gauger, Ulrich
Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand
Altenhofen, Lutz
Rösch, Thomas
author_sort Groth, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 persons above the age of 55 insured with a German medical insurance company in the area of Rinteln, Lower Saxony with a baseline spontaneous annual screening colonoscopy uptake of 1 %. Both capsule or conventional colonoscopy were offered. Interested persons were given information about the two screening options by four local gastroenterologists and examinations were then performed according to screenees’ final choice. RESULTS: 154 persons sought further information, and 34 and 90 underwent conventional and capsule colonoscopy, respectively. Colonoscopy uptake was thus increased by the invitation process by 60 % (1.6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screening uptake (4.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001). Despite similar age distribution in both sex groups, uptake in men was significantly higher (5.6 % vs. 2.8 %, p = 002). However, overall adenoma yield was not different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that offering the option of capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. However, capsule endoscopy sensitivity for adenoma detection needs to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3407015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34070152012-07-28 Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening Groth, Stefan Krause, Horst Behrendt, Rainer Hill, Helge Börner, Michael Bastürk, Murat Plathner, Nora Schütte, Friedrich Gauger, Ulrich Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand Altenhofen, Lutz Rösch, Thomas BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 persons above the age of 55 insured with a German medical insurance company in the area of Rinteln, Lower Saxony with a baseline spontaneous annual screening colonoscopy uptake of 1 %. Both capsule or conventional colonoscopy were offered. Interested persons were given information about the two screening options by four local gastroenterologists and examinations were then performed according to screenees’ final choice. RESULTS: 154 persons sought further information, and 34 and 90 underwent conventional and capsule colonoscopy, respectively. Colonoscopy uptake was thus increased by the invitation process by 60 % (1.6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screening uptake (4.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001). Despite similar age distribution in both sex groups, uptake in men was significantly higher (5.6 % vs. 2.8 %, p = 002). However, overall adenoma yield was not different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that offering the option of capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. However, capsule endoscopy sensitivity for adenoma detection needs to be improved. BioMed Central 2012-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3407015/ /pubmed/22734948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80 Text en Copyright ©2012 Groth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Groth, Stefan
Krause, Horst
Behrendt, Rainer
Hill, Helge
Börner, Michael
Bastürk, Murat
Plathner, Nora
Schütte, Friedrich
Gauger, Ulrich
Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand
Altenhofen, Lutz
Rösch, Thomas
Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title_full Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title_fullStr Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title_short Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
title_sort capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80
work_keys_str_mv AT grothstefan capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT krausehorst capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT behrendtrainer capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT hillhelge capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT bornermichael capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT basturkmurat capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT plathnernora capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT schuttefriedrich capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT gaugerulrich capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT riemannjurgenferdinand capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT altenhofenlutz capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT roschthomas capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening