Cargando…
Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80 |
_version_ | 1782239271293288448 |
---|---|
author | Groth, Stefan Krause, Horst Behrendt, Rainer Hill, Helge Börner, Michael Bastürk, Murat Plathner, Nora Schütte, Friedrich Gauger, Ulrich Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand Altenhofen, Lutz Rösch, Thomas |
author_facet | Groth, Stefan Krause, Horst Behrendt, Rainer Hill, Helge Börner, Michael Bastürk, Murat Plathner, Nora Schütte, Friedrich Gauger, Ulrich Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand Altenhofen, Lutz Rösch, Thomas |
author_sort | Groth, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 persons above the age of 55 insured with a German medical insurance company in the area of Rinteln, Lower Saxony with a baseline spontaneous annual screening colonoscopy uptake of 1 %. Both capsule or conventional colonoscopy were offered. Interested persons were given information about the two screening options by four local gastroenterologists and examinations were then performed according to screenees’ final choice. RESULTS: 154 persons sought further information, and 34 and 90 underwent conventional and capsule colonoscopy, respectively. Colonoscopy uptake was thus increased by the invitation process by 60 % (1.6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screening uptake (4.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001). Despite similar age distribution in both sex groups, uptake in men was significantly higher (5.6 % vs. 2.8 %, p = 002). However, overall adenoma yield was not different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that offering the option of capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. However, capsule endoscopy sensitivity for adenoma detection needs to be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3407015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34070152012-07-28 Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening Groth, Stefan Krause, Horst Behrendt, Rainer Hill, Helge Börner, Michael Bastürk, Murat Plathner, Nora Schütte, Friedrich Gauger, Ulrich Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand Altenhofen, Lutz Rösch, Thomas BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake. METHODS: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 persons above the age of 55 insured with a German medical insurance company in the area of Rinteln, Lower Saxony with a baseline spontaneous annual screening colonoscopy uptake of 1 %. Both capsule or conventional colonoscopy were offered. Interested persons were given information about the two screening options by four local gastroenterologists and examinations were then performed according to screenees’ final choice. RESULTS: 154 persons sought further information, and 34 and 90 underwent conventional and capsule colonoscopy, respectively. Colonoscopy uptake was thus increased by the invitation process by 60 % (1.6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screening uptake (4.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001). Despite similar age distribution in both sex groups, uptake in men was significantly higher (5.6 % vs. 2.8 %, p = 002). However, overall adenoma yield was not different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that offering the option of capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. However, capsule endoscopy sensitivity for adenoma detection needs to be improved. BioMed Central 2012-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3407015/ /pubmed/22734948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80 Text en Copyright ©2012 Groth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Groth, Stefan Krause, Horst Behrendt, Rainer Hill, Helge Börner, Michael Bastürk, Murat Plathner, Nora Schütte, Friedrich Gauger, Ulrich Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand Altenhofen, Lutz Rösch, Thomas Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title | Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title_full | Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title_short | Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
title_sort | capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-80 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grothstefan capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT krausehorst capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT behrendtrainer capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT hillhelge capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT bornermichael capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT basturkmurat capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT plathnernora capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT schuttefriedrich capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT gaugerulrich capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT riemannjurgenferdinand capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT altenhofenlutz capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening AT roschthomas capsulecolonoscopyincreasesuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreening |