Cargando…
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with diff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709 |
_version_ | 1782239327117377536 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez, Alexis Otaño, Natalia Rodríguez, Omaira Sánchez, Renata Benítez, Gustavo Schweitzer, Michael |
author_facet | Sánchez, Alexis Otaño, Natalia Rodríguez, Omaira Sánchez, Renata Benítez, Gustavo Schweitzer, Michael |
author_sort | Sánchez, Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with different levels of expertise in laparoscopic surgery, novices (A), intermediates (B), and experts (C), was evaluated using a low-cost inert model in the following tasks: (1) intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion, (2) transcystic exploration, (3) T-tube placement, and (4) choledochoscope management. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify differences among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 14 individuals were evaluated: 5 novices (A), 5 intermediates (B), and 4 experts (C). The results involving intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion were similar among the 3 groups. As for the other tasks, the expert had better results than the other 2, in which no significant differences occurred. The proposed model is able to discriminate among individuals with different levels of expertise, indicating that the abilities that the model evaluates are relevant in the surgeon's performance in CBD exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Construct validity for tasks 2 and 3 was demonstrated. However, task 1 was no capable of distinguishing between groups, and task 4 was not statistically validated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3407429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34074292012-08-13 Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity Sánchez, Alexis Otaño, Natalia Rodríguez, Omaira Sánchez, Renata Benítez, Gustavo Schweitzer, Michael JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with different levels of expertise in laparoscopic surgery, novices (A), intermediates (B), and experts (C), was evaluated using a low-cost inert model in the following tasks: (1) intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion, (2) transcystic exploration, (3) T-tube placement, and (4) choledochoscope management. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify differences among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 14 individuals were evaluated: 5 novices (A), 5 intermediates (B), and 4 experts (C). The results involving intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion were similar among the 3 groups. As for the other tasks, the expert had better results than the other 2, in which no significant differences occurred. The proposed model is able to discriminate among individuals with different levels of expertise, indicating that the abilities that the model evaluates are relevant in the surgeon's performance in CBD exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Construct validity for tasks 2 and 3 was demonstrated. However, task 1 was no capable of distinguishing between groups, and task 4 was not statistically validated. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3407429/ /pubmed/22906323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Sánchez, Alexis Otaño, Natalia Rodríguez, Omaira Sánchez, Renata Benítez, Gustavo Schweitzer, Michael Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title | Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title_full | Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title_short | Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity |
title_sort | laparoscopic common bile duct exploration four-task training model: construct validity |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezalexis laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity AT otanonatalia laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity AT rodriguezomaira laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity AT sanchezrenata laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity AT benitezgustavo laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity AT schweitzermichael laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity |