Cargando…

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity

BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez, Alexis, Otaño, Natalia, Rodríguez, Omaira, Sánchez, Renata, Benítez, Gustavo, Schweitzer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709
_version_ 1782239327117377536
author Sánchez, Alexis
Otaño, Natalia
Rodríguez, Omaira
Sánchez, Renata
Benítez, Gustavo
Schweitzer, Michael
author_facet Sánchez, Alexis
Otaño, Natalia
Rodríguez, Omaira
Sánchez, Renata
Benítez, Gustavo
Schweitzer, Michael
author_sort Sánchez, Alexis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with different levels of expertise in laparoscopic surgery, novices (A), intermediates (B), and experts (C), was evaluated using a low-cost inert model in the following tasks: (1) intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion, (2) transcystic exploration, (3) T-tube placement, and (4) choledochoscope management. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify differences among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 14 individuals were evaluated: 5 novices (A), 5 intermediates (B), and 4 experts (C). The results involving intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion were similar among the 3 groups. As for the other tasks, the expert had better results than the other 2, in which no significant differences occurred. The proposed model is able to discriminate among individuals with different levels of expertise, indicating that the abilities that the model evaluates are relevant in the surgeon's performance in CBD exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Construct validity for tasks 2 and 3 was demonstrated. However, task 1 was no capable of distinguishing between groups, and task 4 was not statistically validated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3407429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34074292012-08-13 Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity Sánchez, Alexis Otaño, Natalia Rodríguez, Omaira Sánchez, Renata Benítez, Gustavo Schweitzer, Michael JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Training models in laparoscopic surgery allow the surgical team to practice procedures in a safe environment. We have proposed the use of a 4-task, low-cost inert model to practice critical steps of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODS: The performance of 3 groups with different levels of expertise in laparoscopic surgery, novices (A), intermediates (B), and experts (C), was evaluated using a low-cost inert model in the following tasks: (1) intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion, (2) transcystic exploration, (3) T-tube placement, and (4) choledochoscope management. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify differences among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 14 individuals were evaluated: 5 novices (A), 5 intermediates (B), and 4 experts (C). The results involving intraoperative cholangiography catheter insertion were similar among the 3 groups. As for the other tasks, the expert had better results than the other 2, in which no significant differences occurred. The proposed model is able to discriminate among individuals with different levels of expertise, indicating that the abilities that the model evaluates are relevant in the surgeon's performance in CBD exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Construct validity for tasks 2 and 3 was demonstrated. However, task 1 was no capable of distinguishing between groups, and task 4 was not statistically validated. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3407429/ /pubmed/22906323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Sánchez, Alexis
Otaño, Natalia
Rodríguez, Omaira
Sánchez, Renata
Benítez, Gustavo
Schweitzer, Michael
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title_full Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title_short Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Four-Task Training Model: Construct Validity
title_sort laparoscopic common bile duct exploration four-task training model: construct validity
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13291597715709
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezalexis laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity
AT otanonatalia laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity
AT rodriguezomaira laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity
AT sanchezrenata laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity
AT benitezgustavo laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity
AT schweitzermichael laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfourtasktrainingmodelconstructvalidity