Cargando…

Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Approximately 35 million people world-wide have Alzheimer’s disease and this is projected to nearly double by 2030. Cognitive enhancers, including cholinesterase inhibitors (for example, donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine) and memantine (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor anta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tricco, Andrea C, vanderVaart, Sondra, Soobiah, Charlene, Lillie, Erin, Perrier, Laure, Chen, Maggie H, Hemmelgarn, Brenda, Majumdar, Sumit R, Straus, Sharon E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-31
_version_ 1782239375680077824
author Tricco, Andrea C
vanderVaart, Sondra
Soobiah, Charlene
Lillie, Erin
Perrier, Laure
Chen, Maggie H
Hemmelgarn, Brenda
Majumdar, Sumit R
Straus, Sharon E
author_facet Tricco, Andrea C
vanderVaart, Sondra
Soobiah, Charlene
Lillie, Erin
Perrier, Laure
Chen, Maggie H
Hemmelgarn, Brenda
Majumdar, Sumit R
Straus, Sharon E
author_sort Tricco, Andrea C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 35 million people world-wide have Alzheimer’s disease and this is projected to nearly double by 2030. Cognitive enhancers, including cholinesterase inhibitors (for example, donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine) and memantine (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist) have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in many countries. Our objective is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease through a systematic review. METHODS/DESIGN: Studies examining the efficacy, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers compared to placebo, supportive care, and other cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s patients will be included. The primary outcome is cognition and secondary outcomes include function, behavior, quality of life, safety, and cost. Experimental studies (randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials), quasi-experimental studies (controlled before-after, interrupted time series), and observational studies (cohort, case–control studies) will be eligible for inclusion. Inclusion will not be limited by publication status, time period or language of dissemination. We will search electronic databases (for example, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ageline) from inception onwards. The electronic database search will be supplemented by searching for grey literature (for example, conference proceedings, searches in Google and relevant organization websites). Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for inclusion using the eligibility criteria established a priori and independently extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for experimental and quasi-experimental studies and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies. If deemed appropriate, meta-analysis and network (that is, indirect comparisons) meta-analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: Our systematic review will inform the decision of healthcare providers, policy-makers, Alzheimer’s patients and family members about the use of cognitive enhancers, by improving their understanding of the costs, benefits and harms that are associated with these agents. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42012001948
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3407718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34077182012-07-30 Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Tricco, Andrea C vanderVaart, Sondra Soobiah, Charlene Lillie, Erin Perrier, Laure Chen, Maggie H Hemmelgarn, Brenda Majumdar, Sumit R Straus, Sharon E Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Approximately 35 million people world-wide have Alzheimer’s disease and this is projected to nearly double by 2030. Cognitive enhancers, including cholinesterase inhibitors (for example, donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine) and memantine (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist) have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in many countries. Our objective is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease through a systematic review. METHODS/DESIGN: Studies examining the efficacy, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers compared to placebo, supportive care, and other cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s patients will be included. The primary outcome is cognition and secondary outcomes include function, behavior, quality of life, safety, and cost. Experimental studies (randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials), quasi-experimental studies (controlled before-after, interrupted time series), and observational studies (cohort, case–control studies) will be eligible for inclusion. Inclusion will not be limited by publication status, time period or language of dissemination. We will search electronic databases (for example, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ageline) from inception onwards. The electronic database search will be supplemented by searching for grey literature (for example, conference proceedings, searches in Google and relevant organization websites). Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for inclusion using the eligibility criteria established a priori and independently extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for experimental and quasi-experimental studies and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies. If deemed appropriate, meta-analysis and network (that is, indirect comparisons) meta-analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: Our systematic review will inform the decision of healthcare providers, policy-makers, Alzheimer’s patients and family members about the use of cognitive enhancers, by improving their understanding of the costs, benefits and harms that are associated with these agents. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42012001948 BioMed Central 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3407718/ /pubmed/22742585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Tricco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Tricco, Andrea C
vanderVaart, Sondra
Soobiah, Charlene
Lillie, Erin
Perrier, Laure
Chen, Maggie H
Hemmelgarn, Brenda
Majumdar, Sumit R
Straus, Sharon E
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of cognitive enhancers for alzheimer’s disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-31
work_keys_str_mv AT triccoandreac efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT vandervaartsondra efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT soobiahcharlene efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lillieerin efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT perrierlaure efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenmaggieh efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hemmelgarnbrenda efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT majumdarsumitr efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT straussharone efficacyofcognitiveenhancersforalzheimersdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis