Cargando…

Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh

BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal and child mortality requires focused attention on better access, utilisation and coverage of good quality health services and interventions aimed at improving maternal and newborn health among target populations, in particular, pregnant women. Intervention coverage in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Layla, Houweling, Tanja AJ, Azad, Kishwar, Costello, Anthony, Fottrell, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-60
_version_ 1782239377490968576
author Younes, Layla
Houweling, Tanja AJ
Azad, Kishwar
Costello, Anthony
Fottrell, Edward
author_facet Younes, Layla
Houweling, Tanja AJ
Azad, Kishwar
Costello, Anthony
Fottrell, Edward
author_sort Younes, Layla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal and child mortality requires focused attention on better access, utilisation and coverage of good quality health services and interventions aimed at improving maternal and newborn health among target populations, in particular, pregnant women. Intervention coverage in resource and data poor settings is rarely documented. This paper describes four different methods, and their underlying assumptions, to estimate coverage of a community mobilisation women’s group intervention for maternal and newborn health among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: Primary and secondary data sources were used to estimate the intervention’s coverage among pregnant women. Four methods were used: (1) direct measurement of a proxy indicator using intervention survey data; (2) direct measurement among intervention participants and modelled extrapolation based on routine longitudinal surveillance of births; (3) direct measurement among participants and modelled extrapolation based on cross-sectional measurements and national data; and (4) direct measurement among participants and modelled extrapolation based on published national data. RESULTS: The estimated women’s group intervention’s coverage among pregnant women ranged from 30% to 34%, depending on method used. Differences likely reflect differing assumptions and methodological biases of the various methods. CONCLUSION: In the absence of complete and timely population data, choice of coverage estimation method must be based on the strengths and limitations of available methods, capacity and resources for measurement and the ultimate end user needs. Each of the methods presented and discussed here is likely to provide a useful understanding of intervention coverage at a single point in time and Methods 1 and 2 may also provide more reliable estimates of coverage trends. FOOTNOTES: (1)Unpublished data from three focus group discussions with women’s group members and facilitators participating in the Women’s Groups intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3407726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34077262012-07-30 Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh Younes, Layla Houweling, Tanja AJ Azad, Kishwar Costello, Anthony Fottrell, Edward BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing maternal and child mortality requires focused attention on better access, utilisation and coverage of good quality health services and interventions aimed at improving maternal and newborn health among target populations, in particular, pregnant women. Intervention coverage in resource and data poor settings is rarely documented. This paper describes four different methods, and their underlying assumptions, to estimate coverage of a community mobilisation women’s group intervention for maternal and newborn health among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: Primary and secondary data sources were used to estimate the intervention’s coverage among pregnant women. Four methods were used: (1) direct measurement of a proxy indicator using intervention survey data; (2) direct measurement among intervention participants and modelled extrapolation based on routine longitudinal surveillance of births; (3) direct measurement among participants and modelled extrapolation based on cross-sectional measurements and national data; and (4) direct measurement among participants and modelled extrapolation based on published national data. RESULTS: The estimated women’s group intervention’s coverage among pregnant women ranged from 30% to 34%, depending on method used. Differences likely reflect differing assumptions and methodological biases of the various methods. CONCLUSION: In the absence of complete and timely population data, choice of coverage estimation method must be based on the strengths and limitations of available methods, capacity and resources for measurement and the ultimate end user needs. Each of the methods presented and discussed here is likely to provide a useful understanding of intervention coverage at a single point in time and Methods 1 and 2 may also provide more reliable estimates of coverage trends. FOOTNOTES: (1)Unpublished data from three focus group discussions with women’s group members and facilitators participating in the Women’s Groups intervention. BioMed Central 2012-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3407726/ /pubmed/22747973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-60 Text en Copyright ©2012 Younes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Younes, Layla
Houweling, Tanja AJ
Azad, Kishwar
Costello, Anthony
Fottrell, Edward
Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title_full Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title_fullStr Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title_short Estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural Bangladesh
title_sort estimating coverage of a women’s group intervention among a population of pregnant women in rural bangladesh
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-60
work_keys_str_mv AT youneslayla estimatingcoverageofawomensgroupinterventionamongapopulationofpregnantwomeninruralbangladesh
AT houwelingtanjaaj estimatingcoverageofawomensgroupinterventionamongapopulationofpregnantwomeninruralbangladesh
AT azadkishwar estimatingcoverageofawomensgroupinterventionamongapopulationofpregnantwomeninruralbangladesh
AT costelloanthony estimatingcoverageofawomensgroupinterventionamongapopulationofpregnantwomeninruralbangladesh
AT fottrelledward estimatingcoverageofawomensgroupinterventionamongapopulationofpregnantwomeninruralbangladesh