Cargando…

Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap has become a popular option for treating soft tissue defects of lower extremity reconstruction and can be combined with a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle. We present a comparison of the use of the ALT fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Min Jae, Yun, In Sik, Rah, Dong Kyun, Lee, Won Jai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22872841
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.367
_version_ 1782239428711809024
author Lee, Min Jae
Yun, In Sik
Rah, Dong Kyun
Lee, Won Jai
author_facet Lee, Min Jae
Yun, In Sik
Rah, Dong Kyun
Lee, Won Jai
author_sort Lee, Min Jae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap has become a popular option for treating soft tissue defects of lower extremity reconstruction and can be combined with a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle. We present a comparison of the use of the ALT fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous flaps. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom free-tissue transfer was performed between 2005 and 2011 for the reconstruction of lower extremity soft-tissue defects. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: reconstruction using an ALT-FC flap (12 cases) and reconstruction using a vastus lateralis myocutaneous (VL-MC) flap (12 cases). Postoperative complications, functional results, cosmetic results, and donor-site morbidities were studied. RESULTS: Complete flap survival was 100% in both groups. A flap complication was noted in one case (marginal dehiscence) of the ALT-FC group, and no complications were noted in the VL-MC group. In both groups, one case of partial skin graft loss occurred at the donor site, and debulking surgeries were needed for two cases. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for either functional or cosmetic outcomes in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The VL-MC flap is able to fill occasional dead space and has comparable survival rates to ALT-FC with minimal donor-site morbidity. Additionally, the VL-MC flap is easily elevated without myocutaneous perforator injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3408283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34082832012-08-07 Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap Lee, Min Jae Yun, In Sik Rah, Dong Kyun Lee, Won Jai Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap has become a popular option for treating soft tissue defects of lower extremity reconstruction and can be combined with a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle. We present a comparison of the use of the ALT fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous flaps. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom free-tissue transfer was performed between 2005 and 2011 for the reconstruction of lower extremity soft-tissue defects. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: reconstruction using an ALT-FC flap (12 cases) and reconstruction using a vastus lateralis myocutaneous (VL-MC) flap (12 cases). Postoperative complications, functional results, cosmetic results, and donor-site morbidities were studied. RESULTS: Complete flap survival was 100% in both groups. A flap complication was noted in one case (marginal dehiscence) of the ALT-FC group, and no complications were noted in the VL-MC group. In both groups, one case of partial skin graft loss occurred at the donor site, and debulking surgeries were needed for two cases. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for either functional or cosmetic outcomes in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The VL-MC flap is able to fill occasional dead space and has comparable survival rates to ALT-FC with minimal donor-site morbidity. Additionally, the VL-MC flap is easily elevated without myocutaneous perforator injury. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2012-07 2012-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3408283/ /pubmed/22872841 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.367 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Min Jae
Yun, In Sik
Rah, Dong Kyun
Lee, Won Jai
Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title_full Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title_fullStr Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title_full_unstemmed Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title_short Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap
title_sort lower extremity reconstruction using vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap versus anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22872841
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.367
work_keys_str_mv AT leeminjae lowerextremityreconstructionusingvastuslateralismyocutaneousflapversusanterolateralthighfasciocutaneousflap
AT yuninsik lowerextremityreconstructionusingvastuslateralismyocutaneousflapversusanterolateralthighfasciocutaneousflap
AT rahdongkyun lowerextremityreconstructionusingvastuslateralismyocutaneousflapversusanterolateralthighfasciocutaneousflap
AT leewonjai lowerextremityreconstructionusingvastuslateralismyocutaneousflapversusanterolateralthighfasciocutaneousflap