Cargando…
Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy
BACKGROUND: Low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients have excellent outcomes, with treatment modality often selected by perceived effects on quality of life. Acute urinary symptoms are common during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), while chronic symptoms have been linked to urethral dose. Since mos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22681643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-82 |
_version_ | 1782239442781601792 |
---|---|
author | Vainshtein, Jeffrey Abu-Isa, Eyad Olson, Karin B Ray, Michael E Sandler, Howard M Normolle, Dan Litzenberg, Dale W Masi, Kathryn Pan, Charlie Hamstra, Daniel A |
author_facet | Vainshtein, Jeffrey Abu-Isa, Eyad Olson, Karin B Ray, Michael E Sandler, Howard M Normolle, Dan Litzenberg, Dale W Masi, Kathryn Pan, Charlie Hamstra, Daniel A |
author_sort | Vainshtein, Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients have excellent outcomes, with treatment modality often selected by perceived effects on quality of life. Acute urinary symptoms are common during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), while chronic symptoms have been linked to urethral dose. Since most low-risk PCa occurs in the peripheral zone (PZ), we hypothesized that EBRT using urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (US-IMRT) could improve urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) while maintaining high rates of PCa control. METHODS: Patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defined low-risk PCa with no visible lesion within 5 mm of the prostatic urethra on MRI were randomized to US-IMRT or standard (S-) IMRT. Prescription dose was 75.6 Gy in 41 fractions to the PZ + 3–5 mm for US-IMRT and to the prostate + 3 mm for S-IMRT. For US-IMRT, mean proximal and distal urethral doses were limited to 65 Gy and 74 Gy, respectively. HRQOL was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) Quality of Life questionnaire. The primary endpoint was change in urinary HRQOL at 3 months. RESULTS: From June 2004 to November 2006, 16 patients were randomized, after which a futility analysis concluded that continued accrual was unlikely to demonstrate a difference in the primary endpoint. Mean change in EPIC urinary HRQOL at 3 months was −0.5 ± 11.2 in the US-IMRT arm and +3.9 ± 15.3 in the S-IMRT arm (p = 0.52). Median PSA nadir was higher in the US-IMRT arm (1.46 vs. 0.78, p = 0.05). At 4.7 years median follow-up, three US-IMRT and no S-IMRT patients experienced PSA failure (p = 0.06; HR 8.8, 95% CI 0.9–86). Two out of 3 patients with PSA failure had biopsy-proven local failure, both located contralateral to the original site of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with S-IMRT, US-IMRT failed to improve urinary HRQOL and resulted in higher PSA nadir and inferior biochemical control. The high rate of PSA failure and contralateral local failures in US-IMRT patients, despite careful selection of MRI-screened low-risk patients, serve as a cautionary tale for focal PCa treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3408353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34083532012-07-31 Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy Vainshtein, Jeffrey Abu-Isa, Eyad Olson, Karin B Ray, Michael E Sandler, Howard M Normolle, Dan Litzenberg, Dale W Masi, Kathryn Pan, Charlie Hamstra, Daniel A Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients have excellent outcomes, with treatment modality often selected by perceived effects on quality of life. Acute urinary symptoms are common during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), while chronic symptoms have been linked to urethral dose. Since most low-risk PCa occurs in the peripheral zone (PZ), we hypothesized that EBRT using urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (US-IMRT) could improve urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) while maintaining high rates of PCa control. METHODS: Patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defined low-risk PCa with no visible lesion within 5 mm of the prostatic urethra on MRI were randomized to US-IMRT or standard (S-) IMRT. Prescription dose was 75.6 Gy in 41 fractions to the PZ + 3–5 mm for US-IMRT and to the prostate + 3 mm for S-IMRT. For US-IMRT, mean proximal and distal urethral doses were limited to 65 Gy and 74 Gy, respectively. HRQOL was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) Quality of Life questionnaire. The primary endpoint was change in urinary HRQOL at 3 months. RESULTS: From June 2004 to November 2006, 16 patients were randomized, after which a futility analysis concluded that continued accrual was unlikely to demonstrate a difference in the primary endpoint. Mean change in EPIC urinary HRQOL at 3 months was −0.5 ± 11.2 in the US-IMRT arm and +3.9 ± 15.3 in the S-IMRT arm (p = 0.52). Median PSA nadir was higher in the US-IMRT arm (1.46 vs. 0.78, p = 0.05). At 4.7 years median follow-up, three US-IMRT and no S-IMRT patients experienced PSA failure (p = 0.06; HR 8.8, 95% CI 0.9–86). Two out of 3 patients with PSA failure had biopsy-proven local failure, both located contralateral to the original site of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with S-IMRT, US-IMRT failed to improve urinary HRQOL and resulted in higher PSA nadir and inferior biochemical control. The high rate of PSA failure and contralateral local failures in US-IMRT patients, despite careful selection of MRI-screened low-risk patients, serve as a cautionary tale for focal PCa treatments. BioMed Central 2012-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3408353/ /pubmed/22681643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-82 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vainshtein et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vainshtein, Jeffrey Abu-Isa, Eyad Olson, Karin B Ray, Michael E Sandler, Howard M Normolle, Dan Litzenberg, Dale W Masi, Kathryn Pan, Charlie Hamstra, Daniel A Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title | Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title_full | Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title_fullStr | Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title_short | Randomized phase II trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
title_sort | randomized phase ii trial of urethral sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy in low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22681643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-82 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vainshteinjeffrey randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT abuisaeyad randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT olsonkarinb randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT raymichaele randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT sandlerhowardm randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT normolledan randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT litzenbergdalew randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT masikathryn randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT pancharlie randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy AT hamstradaniela randomizedphaseiitrialofurethralsparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyinlowriskprostatecancerimplicationsforfocaltherapy |