Cargando…

Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling

The hyporheic zone in stream ecosystems is a heterogeneous key habitat for species across many taxa. Consequently, it attracts high attention among freshwater scientists, but generally applicable guidelines on sampling strategies are lacking. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braun, Alexander, Auerswald, Karl, Geist, Juergen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22860053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042046
_version_ 1782239459071229952
author Braun, Alexander
Auerswald, Karl
Geist, Juergen
author_facet Braun, Alexander
Auerswald, Karl
Geist, Juergen
author_sort Braun, Alexander
collection PubMed
description The hyporheic zone in stream ecosystems is a heterogeneous key habitat for species across many taxa. Consequently, it attracts high attention among freshwater scientists, but generally applicable guidelines on sampling strategies are lacking. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and validate such sampling guidelines. Applying geostatistical analysis, we quantified the spatio-temporal variability of parameters, which characterize the physico-chemical substratum conditions in the hyporheic zone. We investigated eight stream reaches in six small streams that are typical for the majority of temperate areas. Data was collected on two occasions in six stream reaches (development data), and once in two additional reaches, after one year (validation data). In this study, the term spatial variability refers to patch contrast (patch to patch variance) and patch size (spatial extent of a patch). Patch contrast of hyporheic parameters (specific conductance, pH and dissolved oxygen) increased with macrophyte cover (r(2) = 0.95, p<0.001), while patch size of hyporheic parameters decreased from 6 to 2 m with increasing sinuosity of the stream course (r(2) = 0.91, p<0.001), irrespective of the time of year. Since the spatial variability of hyporheic parameters varied between stream reaches, our results suggest that sampling design should be adapted to suit specific stream reaches. The distance between sampling sites should be inversely related to the sinuosity, while the number of samples should be related to macrophyte cover.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3408430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34084302012-08-02 Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling Braun, Alexander Auerswald, Karl Geist, Juergen PLoS One Research Article The hyporheic zone in stream ecosystems is a heterogeneous key habitat for species across many taxa. Consequently, it attracts high attention among freshwater scientists, but generally applicable guidelines on sampling strategies are lacking. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and validate such sampling guidelines. Applying geostatistical analysis, we quantified the spatio-temporal variability of parameters, which characterize the physico-chemical substratum conditions in the hyporheic zone. We investigated eight stream reaches in six small streams that are typical for the majority of temperate areas. Data was collected on two occasions in six stream reaches (development data), and once in two additional reaches, after one year (validation data). In this study, the term spatial variability refers to patch contrast (patch to patch variance) and patch size (spatial extent of a patch). Patch contrast of hyporheic parameters (specific conductance, pH and dissolved oxygen) increased with macrophyte cover (r(2) = 0.95, p<0.001), while patch size of hyporheic parameters decreased from 6 to 2 m with increasing sinuosity of the stream course (r(2) = 0.91, p<0.001), irrespective of the time of year. Since the spatial variability of hyporheic parameters varied between stream reaches, our results suggest that sampling design should be adapted to suit specific stream reaches. The distance between sampling sites should be inversely related to the sinuosity, while the number of samples should be related to macrophyte cover. Public Library of Science 2012-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3408430/ /pubmed/22860053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042046 Text en © 2012 Braun et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Braun, Alexander
Auerswald, Karl
Geist, Juergen
Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title_full Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title_fullStr Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title_full_unstemmed Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title_short Drivers and Spatio-Temporal Extent of Hyporheic Patch Variation: Implications for Sampling
title_sort drivers and spatio-temporal extent of hyporheic patch variation: implications for sampling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22860053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042046
work_keys_str_mv AT braunalexander driversandspatiotemporalextentofhyporheicpatchvariationimplicationsforsampling
AT auerswaldkarl driversandspatiotemporalextentofhyporheicpatchvariationimplicationsforsampling
AT geistjuergen driversandspatiotemporalextentofhyporheicpatchvariationimplicationsforsampling