Cargando…
Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has not been defined. The IMPACT SHPT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080) study assessed whether dose-titrated paricalcitol plus supplemental cinacalcet only for hypercalcaemia is superior to cinacalcet plus low-dose vit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22387567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs018 |
_version_ | 1782239507348717568 |
---|---|
author | Ketteler, Markus Martin, Kevin J. Wolf, Myles Amdahl, Michael Cozzolino, Mario Goldsmith, David Sharma, Amit Marx, Steven Khan, Samina |
author_facet | Ketteler, Markus Martin, Kevin J. Wolf, Myles Amdahl, Michael Cozzolino, Mario Goldsmith, David Sharma, Amit Marx, Steven Khan, Samina |
author_sort | Ketteler, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has not been defined. The IMPACT SHPT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080) study assessed whether dose-titrated paricalcitol plus supplemental cinacalcet only for hypercalcaemia is superior to cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in patients with SHPT on haemodialysis. METHODS: In this 28-week, multicentre, open-label Phase 4 study, participants were randomly selected to receive paricalcitol or cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D. Randomization and analyses were stratified by mode of paricalcitol administration [intravenous (IV) or oral]. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean iPTH value of 150–300 pg/mL during Weeks 21–28. RESULTS: Of 272 subjects randomized, 268 received one or more dose of study drug; 101 in the IV and 110 in the oral stratum with two or more values during Weeks 21–28 were included in the primary analysis. In the IV stratum, 57.7% of subjects in the paricalcitol versus 32.7% in the cinacalcet group (P = 0.016) achieved the primary end point. In the oral stratum, the corresponding proportions of subjects were 54.4% for paricalcitol and 43.4% for cinacalcet (P = 0.260). Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel analysis, controlling for stratum, revealed overall superiority of paricalcitol (56.0%) over cinacalcet (38.2%; P = 0.010) in achieving iPTH 150–300 pg/mL during Weeks 21–28. Hypercalcaemia occurred in 4 (7.7%) and 0 (0%) of paricalcitol-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 46.9% and 54.7% of cinacalcet-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. CONCLUSION: Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D provided superior control of iPTH, with low incidence of hypercalcaemia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3408938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34089382012-08-01 Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study Ketteler, Markus Martin, Kevin J. Wolf, Myles Amdahl, Michael Cozzolino, Mario Goldsmith, David Sharma, Amit Marx, Steven Khan, Samina Nephrol Dial Transplant Clinical Science BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has not been defined. The IMPACT SHPT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080) study assessed whether dose-titrated paricalcitol plus supplemental cinacalcet only for hypercalcaemia is superior to cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in patients with SHPT on haemodialysis. METHODS: In this 28-week, multicentre, open-label Phase 4 study, participants were randomly selected to receive paricalcitol or cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D. Randomization and analyses were stratified by mode of paricalcitol administration [intravenous (IV) or oral]. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean iPTH value of 150–300 pg/mL during Weeks 21–28. RESULTS: Of 272 subjects randomized, 268 received one or more dose of study drug; 101 in the IV and 110 in the oral stratum with two or more values during Weeks 21–28 were included in the primary analysis. In the IV stratum, 57.7% of subjects in the paricalcitol versus 32.7% in the cinacalcet group (P = 0.016) achieved the primary end point. In the oral stratum, the corresponding proportions of subjects were 54.4% for paricalcitol and 43.4% for cinacalcet (P = 0.260). Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel analysis, controlling for stratum, revealed overall superiority of paricalcitol (56.0%) over cinacalcet (38.2%; P = 0.010) in achieving iPTH 150–300 pg/mL during Weeks 21–28. Hypercalcaemia occurred in 4 (7.7%) and 0 (0%) of paricalcitol-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 46.9% and 54.7% of cinacalcet-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. CONCLUSION: Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D provided superior control of iPTH, with low incidence of hypercalcaemia. Oxford University Press 2012-08 2012-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3408938/ /pubmed/22387567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs018 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Ketteler, Markus Martin, Kevin J. Wolf, Myles Amdahl, Michael Cozzolino, Mario Goldsmith, David Sharma, Amit Marx, Steven Khan, Samina Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title | Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title_full | Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title_fullStr | Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title_short | Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study |
title_sort | paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin d therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the impact shpt study |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3408938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22387567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kettelermarkus paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT martinkevinj paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT wolfmyles paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT amdahlmichael paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT cozzolinomario paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT goldsmithdavid paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT sharmaamit paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT marxsteven paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy AT khansamina paricalcitolversuscinacalcetpluslowdosevitamindtherapyforthetreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisresultsoftheimpactshptstudy |