Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning is gaining interest as potential method to induce resistance against ischemia reperfusion injury in a variety of clinical settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether remote ischemic conditioning reduces mortality, major...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22860077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042179 |
_version_ | 1782239547948531712 |
---|---|
author | Brevoord, Daniel Kranke, Peter Kuijpers, Marijn Weber, Nina Hollmann, Markus Preckel, Benedikt |
author_facet | Brevoord, Daniel Kranke, Peter Kuijpers, Marijn Weber, Nina Hollmann, Markus Preckel, Benedikt |
author_sort | Brevoord, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning is gaining interest as potential method to induce resistance against ischemia reperfusion injury in a variety of clinical settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether remote ischemic conditioning reduces mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, length of stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit and biomarker release in patients who suffer from or are at risk for ischemia reperfusion injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing remote ischemic conditioning, regardless of timing, with no conditioning. Two investigators independently selected suitable trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data. 23 studies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (15 studies), percutaneous coronary intervention (four studies) and vascular surgery (four studies), comprising in total 1878 patients, were included in this review. Compared to no conditioning, remote ischemic conditioning did not reduce mortality (odds ratio 1.22 [95% confidence interval 0.48, 3.07]) or major adverse cardiovascular events (0.65 [0.38, 1.14]). However, the incidence of myocardial infarction was reduced with remote ischemic conditioning (0.50 [0.31, 0.82]), as was peak troponin release (standardized mean difference −0.28 [−0.47, −0.09]). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that remote ischemic conditioning reduces mortality associated with ischemic events; nor does it reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. However, remote ischemic conditioning did reduce the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarctions, as well as the release of troponin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3409156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34091562012-08-02 Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Brevoord, Daniel Kranke, Peter Kuijpers, Marijn Weber, Nina Hollmann, Markus Preckel, Benedikt PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning is gaining interest as potential method to induce resistance against ischemia reperfusion injury in a variety of clinical settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether remote ischemic conditioning reduces mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, length of stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit and biomarker release in patients who suffer from or are at risk for ischemia reperfusion injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing remote ischemic conditioning, regardless of timing, with no conditioning. Two investigators independently selected suitable trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data. 23 studies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (15 studies), percutaneous coronary intervention (four studies) and vascular surgery (four studies), comprising in total 1878 patients, were included in this review. Compared to no conditioning, remote ischemic conditioning did not reduce mortality (odds ratio 1.22 [95% confidence interval 0.48, 3.07]) or major adverse cardiovascular events (0.65 [0.38, 1.14]). However, the incidence of myocardial infarction was reduced with remote ischemic conditioning (0.50 [0.31, 0.82]), as was peak troponin release (standardized mean difference −0.28 [−0.47, −0.09]). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that remote ischemic conditioning reduces mortality associated with ischemic events; nor does it reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. However, remote ischemic conditioning did reduce the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarctions, as well as the release of troponin. Public Library of Science 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3409156/ /pubmed/22860077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042179 Text en © 2012 Brevoord et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brevoord, Daniel Kranke, Peter Kuijpers, Marijn Weber, Nina Hollmann, Markus Preckel, Benedikt Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Protect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | remote ischemic conditioning to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22860077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brevoorddaniel remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krankepeter remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kuijpersmarijn remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT webernina remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hollmannmarkus remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT preckelbenedikt remoteischemicconditioningtoprotectagainstischemiareperfusioninjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |