Cargando…

Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis

It has been suggested that pathway analysis can complement single-SNP analysis in exploring genomewide association data. Pathway analysis incorporates the available biological knowledge of genes and SNPs and is expected to improve the chances of revealing the underlying genetic architecture of compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evangelou, Marina, Rendon, Augusto, Ouwehand, Willem H., Wernisch, Lorenz, Dudbridge, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041018
_version_ 1782239558835896320
author Evangelou, Marina
Rendon, Augusto
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Wernisch, Lorenz
Dudbridge, Frank
author_facet Evangelou, Marina
Rendon, Augusto
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Wernisch, Lorenz
Dudbridge, Frank
author_sort Evangelou, Marina
collection PubMed
description It has been suggested that pathway analysis can complement single-SNP analysis in exploring genomewide association data. Pathway analysis incorporates the available biological knowledge of genes and SNPs and is expected to improve the chances of revealing the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Methods for pathway analysis can be classified as competitive (enrichment) or self-contained (association) according to the hypothesis tested. Although association tests are statistically more powerful than enrichment tests they can be difficult to calibrate because biases in analysis accumulate across multiple SNPs or genes. Furthermore, enrichment tests can be more scientifically relevant than association tests, as they detect pathways with relatively more evidence for association than the remaining genes. Here we show how some well known association tests can be simply adapted to test for enrichment, and compare their performance to some established enrichment tests. We propose versions of the Adaptive Rank Truncated Product (ARTP), Tail Strength Measure and Fisher’s combination of p-values for testing the enrichment null hypothesis. We compare the behaviour of these proposed methods with the established Hypergeometric Test and Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). The results of the simulation study show that the modified version of the ARTP method has generally the best performance across the situations considered. The methods were also applied for finding enriched pathways for body mass index (BMI) and platelet function phenotypes. The pathway analysis of BMI identified the Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide pathway as significantly associated with BMI. This pathway has been previously reported as associated with BMI and the risk of obesity. The ARTP method was the method that identified the largest number of enriched pathways across all tested pathway databases and phenotypes. The simulation and data application results are in agreement with previous work on association tests and suggests that the ARTP should be preferred for both enrichment and association testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3409204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34092042012-08-02 Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis Evangelou, Marina Rendon, Augusto Ouwehand, Willem H. Wernisch, Lorenz Dudbridge, Frank PLoS One Research Article It has been suggested that pathway analysis can complement single-SNP analysis in exploring genomewide association data. Pathway analysis incorporates the available biological knowledge of genes and SNPs and is expected to improve the chances of revealing the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Methods for pathway analysis can be classified as competitive (enrichment) or self-contained (association) according to the hypothesis tested. Although association tests are statistically more powerful than enrichment tests they can be difficult to calibrate because biases in analysis accumulate across multiple SNPs or genes. Furthermore, enrichment tests can be more scientifically relevant than association tests, as they detect pathways with relatively more evidence for association than the remaining genes. Here we show how some well known association tests can be simply adapted to test for enrichment, and compare their performance to some established enrichment tests. We propose versions of the Adaptive Rank Truncated Product (ARTP), Tail Strength Measure and Fisher’s combination of p-values for testing the enrichment null hypothesis. We compare the behaviour of these proposed methods with the established Hypergeometric Test and Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). The results of the simulation study show that the modified version of the ARTP method has generally the best performance across the situations considered. The methods were also applied for finding enriched pathways for body mass index (BMI) and platelet function phenotypes. The pathway analysis of BMI identified the Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide pathway as significantly associated with BMI. This pathway has been previously reported as associated with BMI and the risk of obesity. The ARTP method was the method that identified the largest number of enriched pathways across all tested pathway databases and phenotypes. The simulation and data application results are in agreement with previous work on association tests and suggests that the ARTP should be preferred for both enrichment and association testing. Public Library of Science 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3409204/ /pubmed/22859961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041018 Text en © 2012 Evangelou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Evangelou, Marina
Rendon, Augusto
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Wernisch, Lorenz
Dudbridge, Frank
Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title_full Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title_short Comparison of Methods for Competitive Tests of Pathway Analysis
title_sort comparison of methods for competitive tests of pathway analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041018
work_keys_str_mv AT evangeloumarina comparisonofmethodsforcompetitivetestsofpathwayanalysis
AT rendonaugusto comparisonofmethodsforcompetitivetestsofpathwayanalysis
AT ouwehandwillemh comparisonofmethodsforcompetitivetestsofpathwayanalysis
AT wernischlorenz comparisonofmethodsforcompetitivetestsofpathwayanalysis
AT dudbridgefrank comparisonofmethodsforcompetitivetestsofpathwayanalysis