Cargando…
How important are conidial appendages?
The genus The genus Dinemasporium is used as a case study to evaluate the importance of conidial appendages for generic level classification of coelomycetous fungi. Based on morphology and sequence data of the large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (LSU, 28S) and the internal transcribed spacers a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23105158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158512X652624 |
_version_ | 1782239584855261184 |
---|---|
author | Crous, P.W. Verkley, G.J.M. Christensen, M. Castañeda-Ruiz, R.F. Groenewald, J.Z. |
author_facet | Crous, P.W. Verkley, G.J.M. Christensen, M. Castañeda-Ruiz, R.F. Groenewald, J.Z. |
author_sort | Crous, P.W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The genus The genus Dinemasporium is used as a case study to evaluate the importance of conidial appendages for generic level classification of coelomycetous fungi. Based on morphology and sequence data of the large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (LSU, 28S) and the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rRNA gene of the nrDNA operon, the genus Dinemasporium is circumscribed, and an epitype designated for D. strigosum, the type of the genus. A further five species are introduced in Dinemasporium, namely D. pseudostrigosum (isolated from Triticum aestivum, Germany and Stigmaphyllon sagraeanum, Cuba), D. americana (soil, USA), D. polygonum (Polygonum sachalinense, Netherlands), D. pseudoindicum (soil, USA), and D. morbidum (human sputum, Netherlands and hare dung, New Zealand). Brunneodinemasporium, based on B. brasiliense, is introduced to accommodate Dinemasporium-like species with tightly aggregated brown conidiogenous cells, and pale brown conidia. Dendrophoma (= Amphitiarospora) is reinstated as distinct from Dinemasporium, and an epitype designated for D. cytisporoides, characterised by its superficial, stipitate to cupulate conidiomata, and small conidia with two polar, tubular, exogenous appendages. The genus Stauronema is reduced to synonymy under Dinemasporium. Pseudolachnea (1-septate conidia) is supported as distinct from Dinemasporium (aseptate conidia), and P. fraxini introduced as a novel species. Taxa in this generic complex differ by combination of morphological characters of conidiomata, setae, conidia and appendages. Appendage morphology alone is rejected as informative at the generic level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3409409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34094092012-10-26 How important are conidial appendages? Crous, P.W. Verkley, G.J.M. Christensen, M. Castañeda-Ruiz, R.F. Groenewald, J.Z. Persoonia Research Article The genus The genus Dinemasporium is used as a case study to evaluate the importance of conidial appendages for generic level classification of coelomycetous fungi. Based on morphology and sequence data of the large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (LSU, 28S) and the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rRNA gene of the nrDNA operon, the genus Dinemasporium is circumscribed, and an epitype designated for D. strigosum, the type of the genus. A further five species are introduced in Dinemasporium, namely D. pseudostrigosum (isolated from Triticum aestivum, Germany and Stigmaphyllon sagraeanum, Cuba), D. americana (soil, USA), D. polygonum (Polygonum sachalinense, Netherlands), D. pseudoindicum (soil, USA), and D. morbidum (human sputum, Netherlands and hare dung, New Zealand). Brunneodinemasporium, based on B. brasiliense, is introduced to accommodate Dinemasporium-like species with tightly aggregated brown conidiogenous cells, and pale brown conidia. Dendrophoma (= Amphitiarospora) is reinstated as distinct from Dinemasporium, and an epitype designated for D. cytisporoides, characterised by its superficial, stipitate to cupulate conidiomata, and small conidia with two polar, tubular, exogenous appendages. The genus Stauronema is reduced to synonymy under Dinemasporium. Pseudolachnea (1-septate conidia) is supported as distinct from Dinemasporium (aseptate conidia), and P. fraxini introduced as a novel species. Taxa in this generic complex differ by combination of morphological characters of conidiomata, setae, conidia and appendages. Appendage morphology alone is rejected as informative at the generic level. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures 2012-06-04 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3409409/ /pubmed/23105158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158512X652624 Text en © 2012 Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crous, P.W. Verkley, G.J.M. Christensen, M. Castañeda-Ruiz, R.F. Groenewald, J.Z. How important are conidial appendages? |
title | How important are conidial appendages? |
title_full | How important are conidial appendages? |
title_fullStr | How important are conidial appendages? |
title_full_unstemmed | How important are conidial appendages? |
title_short | How important are conidial appendages? |
title_sort | how important are conidial appendages? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23105158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158512X652624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crouspw howimportantareconidialappendages AT verkleygjm howimportantareconidialappendages AT christensenm howimportantareconidialappendages AT castanedaruizrf howimportantareconidialappendages AT groenewaldjz howimportantareconidialappendages |