Cargando…

Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation

BACKGROUND: Random errors in measurement of a risk factor will introduce downward bias of an estimated association to a disease or a disease marker. This phenomenon is called regression dilution bias. A bias correction may be made with data from a validity study or a reliability study. AIMS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Berglund, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22401135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.668143
_version_ 1782239710861590528
author Berglund, Lars
author_facet Berglund, Lars
author_sort Berglund, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Random errors in measurement of a risk factor will introduce downward bias of an estimated association to a disease or a disease marker. This phenomenon is called regression dilution bias. A bias correction may be made with data from a validity study or a reliability study. AIMS AND METHODS: In this article we give a non-technical description of designs of reliability studies with emphasis on selection of individuals for a repeated measurement, assumptions of measurement error models, and correction methods for the slope in a simple linear regression model where the dependent variable is a continuous variable. Also, we describe situations where correction for regression dilution bias is not appropriate. RESULTS: The methods are illustrated with the association between insulin sensitivity measured with the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique and fasting insulin, where measurement of the latter variable carries noticeable random error. We provide software tools for estimation of a corrected slope in a simple linear regression model assuming data for a continuous dependent variable and a continuous risk factor from a main study and an additional measurement of the risk factor in a reliability study. Also, we supply programs for estimation of the number of individuals needed in the reliability study and for choice of its design. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion is that correction for regression dilution bias is seldom applied in epidemiological studies. This may cause important effects of risk factors with large measurement errors to be neglected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3410287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34102872012-08-02 Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation Berglund, Lars Ups J Med Sci Original Articles BACKGROUND: Random errors in measurement of a risk factor will introduce downward bias of an estimated association to a disease or a disease marker. This phenomenon is called regression dilution bias. A bias correction may be made with data from a validity study or a reliability study. AIMS AND METHODS: In this article we give a non-technical description of designs of reliability studies with emphasis on selection of individuals for a repeated measurement, assumptions of measurement error models, and correction methods for the slope in a simple linear regression model where the dependent variable is a continuous variable. Also, we describe situations where correction for regression dilution bias is not appropriate. RESULTS: The methods are illustrated with the association between insulin sensitivity measured with the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique and fasting insulin, where measurement of the latter variable carries noticeable random error. We provide software tools for estimation of a corrected slope in a simple linear regression model assuming data for a continuous dependent variable and a continuous risk factor from a main study and an additional measurement of the risk factor in a reliability study. Also, we supply programs for estimation of the number of individuals needed in the reliability study and for choice of its design. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion is that correction for regression dilution bias is seldom applied in epidemiological studies. This may cause important effects of risk factors with large measurement errors to be neglected. Informa Healthcare 2012-08 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3410287/ /pubmed/22401135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.668143 Text en © Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Berglund, Lars
Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title_full Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title_fullStr Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title_full_unstemmed Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title_short Regression dilution bias: Tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
title_sort regression dilution bias: tools for correction methods and sample size calculation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22401135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.668143
work_keys_str_mv AT berglundlars regressiondilutionbiastoolsforcorrectionmethodsandsamplesizecalculation