Cargando…

CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: CIBIC plus-J is the Japanese language version equivalent to CIBIC plus. Variability of CIBIC plus-J arises among raters in accordance with their experience and their memories of patients’ conditions at baseline. Therefore, in a multicenter trial of Alzheimer's disease, CIBIC pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Yu, Usui, Mikiko, Nishikawa, Takashi, Takita, Masashi, Shigeta, Masahiro, Imai, Yukimichi, Urakami, Katsuya, Kita, Hiroshi, Homma, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000339953
_version_ 1782239736190992384
author Nakamura, Yu
Usui, Mikiko
Nishikawa, Takashi
Takita, Masashi
Shigeta, Masahiro
Imai, Yukimichi
Urakami, Katsuya
Kita, Hiroshi
Homma, Akira
author_facet Nakamura, Yu
Usui, Mikiko
Nishikawa, Takashi
Takita, Masashi
Shigeta, Masahiro
Imai, Yukimichi
Urakami, Katsuya
Kita, Hiroshi
Homma, Akira
author_sort Nakamura, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: CIBIC plus-J is the Japanese language version equivalent to CIBIC plus. Variability of CIBIC plus-J arises among raters in accordance with their experience and their memories of patients’ conditions at baseline. Therefore, in a multicenter trial of Alzheimer's disease, CIBIC plus-J interviews with Alzheimer's disease patients were videotaped, and the tapes were assessed by central raters as a means to improve the reliability of CIBIC plus-J assessment. METHODS: Two of eight central raters were randomly selected and independently assessed the CIBIC plus-J of each patient. RESULTS: CIBIC plus-J of 41 patients was assessed. The agreement rate between the two raters was 46.3% (19/41), when two raters assessed the CIBIC plus-J of the same patient. However, when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement rate was 97.6% (40/41). Although the kappa coefficients contained coincidence, simple and quadratic weighted kappa coefficients [95% confidential interval (CI)] were 0.226 (0.066–0.386) and 0.633 (0.507–0.759), respectively, and when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement kappa was 0.896 (0.752–1.041). The interclass coefficient from the two-way layout model was 0.639. CONCLUSION: The reliability of the CIBIC plus-J assessment with the videotaped method was acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3410446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34104462012-08-02 CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients Nakamura, Yu Usui, Mikiko Nishikawa, Takashi Takita, Masashi Shigeta, Masahiro Imai, Yukimichi Urakami, Katsuya Kita, Hiroshi Homma, Akira Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra Original Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: CIBIC plus-J is the Japanese language version equivalent to CIBIC plus. Variability of CIBIC plus-J arises among raters in accordance with their experience and their memories of patients’ conditions at baseline. Therefore, in a multicenter trial of Alzheimer's disease, CIBIC plus-J interviews with Alzheimer's disease patients were videotaped, and the tapes were assessed by central raters as a means to improve the reliability of CIBIC plus-J assessment. METHODS: Two of eight central raters were randomly selected and independently assessed the CIBIC plus-J of each patient. RESULTS: CIBIC plus-J of 41 patients was assessed. The agreement rate between the two raters was 46.3% (19/41), when two raters assessed the CIBIC plus-J of the same patient. However, when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement rate was 97.6% (40/41). Although the kappa coefficients contained coincidence, simple and quadratic weighted kappa coefficients [95% confidential interval (CI)] were 0.226 (0.066–0.386) and 0.633 (0.507–0.759), respectively, and when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement kappa was 0.896 (0.752–1.041). The interclass coefficient from the two-way layout model was 0.639. CONCLUSION: The reliability of the CIBIC plus-J assessment with the videotaped method was acceptable. S. Karger AG 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3410446/ /pubmed/22859918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000339953 Text en Copyright © 2012 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivative-Works License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nakamura, Yu
Usui, Mikiko
Nishikawa, Takashi
Takita, Masashi
Shigeta, Masahiro
Imai, Yukimichi
Urakami, Katsuya
Kita, Hiroshi
Homma, Akira
CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title_full CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title_fullStr CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title_full_unstemmed CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title_short CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer's Disease Patients
title_sort cibic plus-j assessment using a videotaped method in alzheimer's disease patients
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3410446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000339953
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurayu cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT usuimikiko cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT nishikawatakashi cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT takitamasashi cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT shigetamasahiro cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT imaiyukimichi cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT urakamikatsuya cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT kitahiroshi cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients
AT hommaakira cibicplusjassessmentusingavideotapedmethodinalzheimersdiseasepatients