Cargando…
Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size
Allelic effects at quantitative trait loci (QTL) between lineages are potentially informative for indicating the action of natural selection. The QTL Sign Test uses the number of + and − alleles observed in a QTL study to infer a history of selection. This test has been constructed to condition on t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22908039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003228 |
_version_ | 1782239801516228608 |
---|---|
author | Rice, Daniel P. Townsend, Jeffrey P. |
author_facet | Rice, Daniel P. Townsend, Jeffrey P. |
author_sort | Rice, Daniel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Allelic effects at quantitative trait loci (QTL) between lineages are potentially informative for indicating the action of natural selection. The QTL Sign Test uses the number of + and − alleles observed in a QTL study to infer a history of selection. This test has been constructed to condition on the phenotypic difference between the two lines in question. By applying the test to QTL data simulated under selection, we demonstrate that conditioning on the phenotypic difference results in a loss of power to reject the neutral hypothesis and marked sensitivity to variation in locus effect magnitude. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3411246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34112462012-08-20 Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size Rice, Daniel P. Townsend, Jeffrey P. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Allelic effects at quantitative trait loci (QTL) between lineages are potentially informative for indicating the action of natural selection. The QTL Sign Test uses the number of + and − alleles observed in a QTL study to infer a history of selection. This test has been constructed to condition on the phenotypic difference between the two lines in question. By applying the test to QTL data simulated under selection, we demonstrate that conditioning on the phenotypic difference results in a loss of power to reject the neutral hypothesis and marked sensitivity to variation in locus effect magnitude. Genetics Society of America 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3411246/ /pubmed/22908039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003228 Text en Copyright © 2012 Rice, Townsend http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Investigations Rice, Daniel P. Townsend, Jeffrey P. Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title | Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title_full | Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title_fullStr | Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title_short | Resampling QTL Effects in the QTL Sign Test Leads to Incongruous Sensitivity to Variance in Effect Size |
title_sort | resampling qtl effects in the qtl sign test leads to incongruous sensitivity to variance in effect size |
topic | Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22908039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricedanielp resamplingqtleffectsintheqtlsigntestleadstoincongruoussensitivitytovarianceineffectsize AT townsendjeffreyp resamplingqtleffectsintheqtlsigntestleadstoincongruoussensitivitytovarianceineffectsize |