Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase for literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Marcus C., Genders, Tessa S. S., van Geuns, Robert-Jan, Moelker, Adriaan, Hunink, M. G. Myriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1
_version_ 1782239808078217216
author de Jong, Marcus C.
Genders, Tessa S. S.
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Moelker, Adriaan
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
author_facet de Jong, Marcus C.
Genders, Tessa S. S.
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Moelker, Adriaan
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
author_sort de Jong, Marcus C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase for literature that evaluated stress MPI for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced echocardiography (ECHO), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). RESULTS: All pooled analyses were based on random effects models. Articles on MRI yielded a total of 2,970 patients from 28 studies, articles on ECHO yielded a sample size of 795 from 10 studies, articles on SPECT yielded 1,323 from 13 studies. For CAD defined as either at least 50 %, at least 70 % or at least 75 % lumen diameter reduction on CCA, the natural logarithms of the diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR) for MRI (3.63; 95 % CI 3.26–4.00) was significantly higher compared to that of SPECT (2.76; 95 % CI 2.28–3.25; P = 0.006) and that of ECHO (2.83; 95 % CI 2.29–3.37; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the lnDOR of SPECT and ECHO (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MRI is superior for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with ECHO and SPECT. ECHO and SPECT demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. KEY POINTS: • MRI can assess myocardial perfusion. • MR perfusion diagnoses coronary artery disease better than echocardiography or SPECT. • Echocardiography and SPECT have similar diagnostic performance. • MRI can save coronary artery disease patients from more invasive tests. • MRI and SPECT show evidence of publication bias, implying possible overestimation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3411304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34113042012-08-23 Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis de Jong, Marcus C. Genders, Tessa S. S. van Geuns, Robert-Jan Moelker, Adriaan Hunink, M. G. Myriam Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase for literature that evaluated stress MPI for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced echocardiography (ECHO), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). RESULTS: All pooled analyses were based on random effects models. Articles on MRI yielded a total of 2,970 patients from 28 studies, articles on ECHO yielded a sample size of 795 from 10 studies, articles on SPECT yielded 1,323 from 13 studies. For CAD defined as either at least 50 %, at least 70 % or at least 75 % lumen diameter reduction on CCA, the natural logarithms of the diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR) for MRI (3.63; 95 % CI 3.26–4.00) was significantly higher compared to that of SPECT (2.76; 95 % CI 2.28–3.25; P = 0.006) and that of ECHO (2.83; 95 % CI 2.29–3.37; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the lnDOR of SPECT and ECHO (P = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MRI is superior for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with ECHO and SPECT. ECHO and SPECT demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. KEY POINTS: • MRI can assess myocardial perfusion. • MR perfusion diagnoses coronary artery disease better than echocardiography or SPECT. • Echocardiography and SPECT have similar diagnostic performance. • MRI can save coronary artery disease patients from more invasive tests. • MRI and SPECT show evidence of publication bias, implying possible overestimation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-19 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3411304/ /pubmed/22527375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiac
de Jong, Marcus C.
Genders, Tessa S. S.
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Moelker, Adriaan
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongmarcusc diagnosticperformanceofstressmyocardialperfusionimagingforcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT genderstessass diagnosticperformanceofstressmyocardialperfusionimagingforcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vangeunsrobertjan diagnosticperformanceofstressmyocardialperfusionimagingforcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moelkeradriaan diagnosticperformanceofstressmyocardialperfusionimagingforcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huninkmgmyriam diagnosticperformanceofstressmyocardialperfusionimagingforcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis