Cargando…

Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false posi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Desmond H, Harrison, Genelle, Murphy, Jittawadee R, Dowler, Megan, Rueda, Leopoldo M, Wilkerson, Richard C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22551078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145
_version_ 1782239817208168448
author Foley, Desmond H
Harrison, Genelle
Murphy, Jittawadee R
Dowler, Megan
Rueda, Leopoldo M
Wilkerson, Richard C
author_facet Foley, Desmond H
Harrison, Genelle
Murphy, Jittawadee R
Dowler, Megan
Rueda, Leopoldo M
Wilkerson, Richard C
author_sort Foley, Desmond H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false positives caused by malaria oocyst DNA in the midgut. This assumption has not been tested with current gold standard PCR assays, and for the variety of conditions that specimens could encounter in the laboratory and field. METHODS: Laboratory Anopheles stephensi were used that had been infected with Plasmodium falciparum 6–7 days and 14 days post infection (p.i.), when oocysts only and oocysts + sporozoites, respectively, are developed. Mosquitoes were killed and immediately frozen, air dried before being frozen, or stored under humid conditions overnight before being frozen, to simulate a range of conditions in the field. Additionally, abdomens were removed anterior to, at, or posterior to the junction of the abdomen and thorax, and both portions were processed using a standard nested PCR of the small sub-unit nuclear ribosomal genes (ssrDNA) with products visualized on agarose gels. RESULTS: Overall, 4.1 % (4/97) of head + thorax samples that were 6–7 days p.i. gave apparent false positives for sporozoites, compared to 9.3 % (9/97) that were positive for abdomens. No positives (0/52) were obtained when similar specimens were bisected anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen, compared to 21.2 % (11/52) that were positive for posterior portions. Multiple bands were noted for positives from the ‘Frozen’ treatment and the rate of false negatives due to DNA degradation appears higher under the ‘Humid’ treatment. Reproducibility of results for the ‘Frozen’ treatment was 90 %. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of specimen condition and the bisection step in determining sporozoite rates, little attention has been paid to them in the literature. Recommendations from this study are that: 1) care needs to be taken to reduce DNA degradation in the field; 2) mosquito abdomens be separated anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen; and 3) DNA sequencing of a subsample of positive results should be undertaken if possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3411414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34114142012-08-04 Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates Foley, Desmond H Harrison, Genelle Murphy, Jittawadee R Dowler, Megan Rueda, Leopoldo M Wilkerson, Richard C Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false positives caused by malaria oocyst DNA in the midgut. This assumption has not been tested with current gold standard PCR assays, and for the variety of conditions that specimens could encounter in the laboratory and field. METHODS: Laboratory Anopheles stephensi were used that had been infected with Plasmodium falciparum 6–7 days and 14 days post infection (p.i.), when oocysts only and oocysts + sporozoites, respectively, are developed. Mosquitoes were killed and immediately frozen, air dried before being frozen, or stored under humid conditions overnight before being frozen, to simulate a range of conditions in the field. Additionally, abdomens were removed anterior to, at, or posterior to the junction of the abdomen and thorax, and both portions were processed using a standard nested PCR of the small sub-unit nuclear ribosomal genes (ssrDNA) with products visualized on agarose gels. RESULTS: Overall, 4.1 % (4/97) of head + thorax samples that were 6–7 days p.i. gave apparent false positives for sporozoites, compared to 9.3 % (9/97) that were positive for abdomens. No positives (0/52) were obtained when similar specimens were bisected anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen, compared to 21.2 % (11/52) that were positive for posterior portions. Multiple bands were noted for positives from the ‘Frozen’ treatment and the rate of false negatives due to DNA degradation appears higher under the ‘Humid’ treatment. Reproducibility of results for the ‘Frozen’ treatment was 90 %. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of specimen condition and the bisection step in determining sporozoite rates, little attention has been paid to them in the literature. Recommendations from this study are that: 1) care needs to be taken to reduce DNA degradation in the field; 2) mosquito abdomens be separated anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen; and 3) DNA sequencing of a subsample of positive results should be undertaken if possible. BioMed Central 2012-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3411414/ /pubmed/22551078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145 Text en Copyright ©2012 Foley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Foley, Desmond H
Harrison, Genelle
Murphy, Jittawadee R
Dowler, Megan
Rueda, Leopoldo M
Wilkerson, Richard C
Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title_full Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title_fullStr Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title_full_unstemmed Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title_short Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
title_sort mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of pcr-derived malaria sporozoite rates
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22551078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145
work_keys_str_mv AT foleydesmondh mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates
AT harrisongenelle mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates
AT murphyjittawadeer mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates
AT dowlermegan mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates
AT ruedaleopoldom mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates
AT wilkersonrichardc mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates