Cargando…
Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates
BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false posi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22551078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145 |
_version_ | 1782239817208168448 |
---|---|
author | Foley, Desmond H Harrison, Genelle Murphy, Jittawadee R Dowler, Megan Rueda, Leopoldo M Wilkerson, Richard C |
author_facet | Foley, Desmond H Harrison, Genelle Murphy, Jittawadee R Dowler, Megan Rueda, Leopoldo M Wilkerson, Richard C |
author_sort | Foley, Desmond H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false positives caused by malaria oocyst DNA in the midgut. This assumption has not been tested with current gold standard PCR assays, and for the variety of conditions that specimens could encounter in the laboratory and field. METHODS: Laboratory Anopheles stephensi were used that had been infected with Plasmodium falciparum 6–7 days and 14 days post infection (p.i.), when oocysts only and oocysts + sporozoites, respectively, are developed. Mosquitoes were killed and immediately frozen, air dried before being frozen, or stored under humid conditions overnight before being frozen, to simulate a range of conditions in the field. Additionally, abdomens were removed anterior to, at, or posterior to the junction of the abdomen and thorax, and both portions were processed using a standard nested PCR of the small sub-unit nuclear ribosomal genes (ssrDNA) with products visualized on agarose gels. RESULTS: Overall, 4.1 % (4/97) of head + thorax samples that were 6–7 days p.i. gave apparent false positives for sporozoites, compared to 9.3 % (9/97) that were positive for abdomens. No positives (0/52) were obtained when similar specimens were bisected anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen, compared to 21.2 % (11/52) that were positive for posterior portions. Multiple bands were noted for positives from the ‘Frozen’ treatment and the rate of false negatives due to DNA degradation appears higher under the ‘Humid’ treatment. Reproducibility of results for the ‘Frozen’ treatment was 90 %. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of specimen condition and the bisection step in determining sporozoite rates, little attention has been paid to them in the literature. Recommendations from this study are that: 1) care needs to be taken to reduce DNA degradation in the field; 2) mosquito abdomens be separated anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen; and 3) DNA sequencing of a subsample of positive results should be undertaken if possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3411414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34114142012-08-04 Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates Foley, Desmond H Harrison, Genelle Murphy, Jittawadee R Dowler, Megan Rueda, Leopoldo M Wilkerson, Richard C Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods offer an alternative to the light microscopy examination of mosquito salivary glands for the determination of malaria sporozoite rates in wild caught female Anopheles. Removal of mosquito abdomens is assumed to eliminate false positives caused by malaria oocyst DNA in the midgut. This assumption has not been tested with current gold standard PCR assays, and for the variety of conditions that specimens could encounter in the laboratory and field. METHODS: Laboratory Anopheles stephensi were used that had been infected with Plasmodium falciparum 6–7 days and 14 days post infection (p.i.), when oocysts only and oocysts + sporozoites, respectively, are developed. Mosquitoes were killed and immediately frozen, air dried before being frozen, or stored under humid conditions overnight before being frozen, to simulate a range of conditions in the field. Additionally, abdomens were removed anterior to, at, or posterior to the junction of the abdomen and thorax, and both portions were processed using a standard nested PCR of the small sub-unit nuclear ribosomal genes (ssrDNA) with products visualized on agarose gels. RESULTS: Overall, 4.1 % (4/97) of head + thorax samples that were 6–7 days p.i. gave apparent false positives for sporozoites, compared to 9.3 % (9/97) that were positive for abdomens. No positives (0/52) were obtained when similar specimens were bisected anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen, compared to 21.2 % (11/52) that were positive for posterior portions. Multiple bands were noted for positives from the ‘Frozen’ treatment and the rate of false negatives due to DNA degradation appears higher under the ‘Humid’ treatment. Reproducibility of results for the ‘Frozen’ treatment was 90 %. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of specimen condition and the bisection step in determining sporozoite rates, little attention has been paid to them in the literature. Recommendations from this study are that: 1) care needs to be taken to reduce DNA degradation in the field; 2) mosquito abdomens be separated anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen; and 3) DNA sequencing of a subsample of positive results should be undertaken if possible. BioMed Central 2012-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3411414/ /pubmed/22551078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145 Text en Copyright ©2012 Foley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Foley, Desmond H Harrison, Genelle Murphy, Jittawadee R Dowler, Megan Rueda, Leopoldo M Wilkerson, Richard C Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title | Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title_full | Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title_fullStr | Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title_full_unstemmed | Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title_short | Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
title_sort | mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of pcr-derived malaria sporozoite rates |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22551078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foleydesmondh mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates AT harrisongenelle mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates AT murphyjittawadeer mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates AT dowlermegan mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates AT ruedaleopoldom mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates AT wilkersonrichardc mosquitobisectionasavariableinestimatesofpcrderivedmalariasporozoiterates |