Cargando…

A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement

A new lancet with an extremely small needle (0.15 mm diameter and 0.75 mm length) mounted on a small pedestal was tested in diabetic patients for blood glucose measurement in a randomized clinical study. A total of 37 diabetic patients were enrolled for the study. A pain scale categorized from 0 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Stanley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22879781
_version_ 1782239843201318912
author Kim, Stanley
author_facet Kim, Stanley
author_sort Kim, Stanley
collection PubMed
description A new lancet with an extremely small needle (0.15 mm diameter and 0.75 mm length) mounted on a small pedestal was tested in diabetic patients for blood glucose measurement in a randomized clinical study. A total of 37 diabetic patients were enrolled for the study. A pain scale categorized from 0 to 3 was created to measure the intensity of puncture pain which was explained to patients before testing. The patients’ fingers were punctured with their own old style lancets at least 1 hour before the punctures by the new lancets, and puncture pains recorded according to the pain scale. All patients tested with the new lancet reported no pain and recorded the puncture pain as scale 0. Among the total 37 patients tested with their old style lancets, 2 patients (5.40%) reported no pain and recorded the pain as scale 0, thirteen patients (35.14%) recorded as scale 1, 16 patients (43.24%) as scale 2, and 6 patients (16.22%) as scale 3. The average pain scale of the patients who used old style lancets was 1.702 with the standard error 0.133. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test shows that the proportion of the pain scales comes from the claimed distribution with unequal frequencies, and chi-square tests for independence indicate that neither sex nor age of the sample patients is related to the pain scales. The paired t-test to test the existence of any difference in pain levels between the new lancet and the old style lancet showed; t = 1.702/0.133 = 12.796 with p-value < 0.005 (df = 36). The average pain level from the old style lancet is significantly higher than from the new lancets. Pain-free needle puncture was achieved by limiting the puncture depth to less than 0.75 mm with a thin needle with a 0.15 mm diameter. By allowing patients to see the new lancets before testing, psychological pain anticipation was minimized as the very thin and short needle is visually less intimidating. With a pain free puncture, better compliance and improved subsequent glucose levels may be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3411530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34115302012-08-09 A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement Kim, Stanley Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes Short Report A new lancet with an extremely small needle (0.15 mm diameter and 0.75 mm length) mounted on a small pedestal was tested in diabetic patients for blood glucose measurement in a randomized clinical study. A total of 37 diabetic patients were enrolled for the study. A pain scale categorized from 0 to 3 was created to measure the intensity of puncture pain which was explained to patients before testing. The patients’ fingers were punctured with their own old style lancets at least 1 hour before the punctures by the new lancets, and puncture pains recorded according to the pain scale. All patients tested with the new lancet reported no pain and recorded the puncture pain as scale 0. Among the total 37 patients tested with their old style lancets, 2 patients (5.40%) reported no pain and recorded the pain as scale 0, thirteen patients (35.14%) recorded as scale 1, 16 patients (43.24%) as scale 2, and 6 patients (16.22%) as scale 3. The average pain scale of the patients who used old style lancets was 1.702 with the standard error 0.133. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test shows that the proportion of the pain scales comes from the claimed distribution with unequal frequencies, and chi-square tests for independence indicate that neither sex nor age of the sample patients is related to the pain scales. The paired t-test to test the existence of any difference in pain levels between the new lancet and the old style lancet showed; t = 1.702/0.133 = 12.796 with p-value < 0.005 (df = 36). The average pain level from the old style lancet is significantly higher than from the new lancets. Pain-free needle puncture was achieved by limiting the puncture depth to less than 0.75 mm with a thin needle with a 0.15 mm diameter. By allowing patients to see the new lancets before testing, psychological pain anticipation was minimized as the very thin and short needle is visually less intimidating. With a pain free puncture, better compliance and improved subsequent glucose levels may be achieved. Libertas Academica 2010-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3411530/ /pubmed/22879781 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Kim, Stanley
A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title_full A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title_fullStr A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title_full_unstemmed A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title_short A Pain-free Lancet with a Small Needle for Glucose Measurement
title_sort pain-free lancet with a small needle for glucose measurement
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22879781
work_keys_str_mv AT kimstanley apainfreelancetwithasmallneedleforglucosemeasurement
AT kimstanley painfreelancetwithasmallneedleforglucosemeasurement