Cargando…
Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA
Three mantras often guide species and ecosystem management: (i) for preventing invasions by harmful species, ‘early detection and rapid response’; (ii) for conserving imperilled native species, ‘protection of biodiversity hotspots’; and (iii) for assessing biosecurity risk, ‘an ounce of prevention e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x |
_version_ | 1782239937337229312 |
---|---|
author | Lodge, David M Turner, Cameron R Jerde, Christopher L Barnes, Matthew A Chadderton, Lindsay Egan, Scott P Feder, Jeffrey L Mahon, Andrew R Pfrender, Michael E |
author_facet | Lodge, David M Turner, Cameron R Jerde, Christopher L Barnes, Matthew A Chadderton, Lindsay Egan, Scott P Feder, Jeffrey L Mahon, Andrew R Pfrender, Michael E |
author_sort | Lodge, David M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three mantras often guide species and ecosystem management: (i) for preventing invasions by harmful species, ‘early detection and rapid response’; (ii) for conserving imperilled native species, ‘protection of biodiversity hotspots’; and (iii) for assessing biosecurity risk, ‘an ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure.’ However, these and other management goals are elusive when traditional sampling tools (e.g. netting, traps, electrofishing, visual surveys) have poor detection limits, are too slow or are not feasible. One visionary solution is to use an organism’s DNA in the environment (eDNA), rather than the organism itself, as the target of detection. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide new evidence demonstrating the feasibility of this approach, showing that eDNA is an accurate indicator of the presence of an impressively diverse set of six aquatic or amphibious taxa including invertebrates, amphibians, a fish and a mammal in a wide range of freshwater habitats. They are also the first to demonstrate that the abundance of eDNA, as measured by qPCR, correlates positively with population abundance estimated with traditional tools. Finally, Thomsen et al. (2012) demonstrate that next-generation sequencing of eDNA can quantify species richness. Overall, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide a revolutionary roadmap for using eDNA for detection of species, estimates of relative abundance and quantification of biodiversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3412215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34122152012-08-07 Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA Lodge, David M Turner, Cameron R Jerde, Christopher L Barnes, Matthew A Chadderton, Lindsay Egan, Scott P Feder, Jeffrey L Mahon, Andrew R Pfrender, Michael E Mol Ecol News and Views Three mantras often guide species and ecosystem management: (i) for preventing invasions by harmful species, ‘early detection and rapid response’; (ii) for conserving imperilled native species, ‘protection of biodiversity hotspots’; and (iii) for assessing biosecurity risk, ‘an ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure.’ However, these and other management goals are elusive when traditional sampling tools (e.g. netting, traps, electrofishing, visual surveys) have poor detection limits, are too slow or are not feasible. One visionary solution is to use an organism’s DNA in the environment (eDNA), rather than the organism itself, as the target of detection. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide new evidence demonstrating the feasibility of this approach, showing that eDNA is an accurate indicator of the presence of an impressively diverse set of six aquatic or amphibious taxa including invertebrates, amphibians, a fish and a mammal in a wide range of freshwater habitats. They are also the first to demonstrate that the abundance of eDNA, as measured by qPCR, correlates positively with population abundance estimated with traditional tools. Finally, Thomsen et al. (2012) demonstrate that next-generation sequencing of eDNA can quantify species richness. Overall, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide a revolutionary roadmap for using eDNA for detection of species, estimates of relative abundance and quantification of biodiversity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3412215/ /pubmed/22624944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x Text en © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | News and Views Lodge, David M Turner, Cameron R Jerde, Christopher L Barnes, Matthew A Chadderton, Lindsay Egan, Scott P Feder, Jeffrey L Mahon, Andrew R Pfrender, Michael E Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title | Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title_full | Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title_fullStr | Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title_short | Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA |
title_sort | conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental dna |
topic | News and Views |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lodgedavidm conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT turnercameronr conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT jerdechristopherl conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT barnesmatthewa conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT chaddertonlindsay conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT eganscottp conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT federjeffreyl conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT mahonandrewr conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna AT pfrendermichaele conservationinacupofwaterestimatingbiodiversityandpopulationabundancefromenvironmentaldna |