Cargando…

Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 and July 2007, 26 patients with locally advanced, medically inoperab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Dong Soo, Kim, Yeon Sil, Cheon, Jae Seok, Song, Jin Ho, Son, Seok Hyun, Jang, Ji Sun, Kang, Young Nam, Kang, Jing Hyoung, Jung, So Lyoung, Yoo, Ie Ryung, Jang, Hong Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-85
_version_ 1782239980753518592
author Lee, Dong Soo
Kim, Yeon Sil
Cheon, Jae Seok
Song, Jin Ho
Son, Seok Hyun
Jang, Ji Sun
Kang, Young Nam
Kang, Jing Hyoung
Jung, So Lyoung
Yoo, Ie Ryung
Jang, Hong Seok
author_facet Lee, Dong Soo
Kim, Yeon Sil
Cheon, Jae Seok
Song, Jin Ho
Son, Seok Hyun
Jang, Ji Sun
Kang, Young Nam
Kang, Jing Hyoung
Jung, So Lyoung
Yoo, Ie Ryung
Jang, Hong Seok
author_sort Lee, Dong Soo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 and July 2007, 26 patients with locally advanced, medically inoperable head and neck cancer or gross residual tumors in close proximity to critical structures following head and neck surgery were treated with SBRT as a boost treatment. All patients were initially treated with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). SBRT boost was prescribed to the median 80% isodose line with a median dose of 21 (range 10–25) Gy in 2–5 (median, 5) fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up after SBRT was 56 (range 27.6 − 80.2) months. The distribution of treatment sites in 26 patients was as follows: the nasopharynx, including the base of the skull in 10 (38.5%); nasal cavity or paranasal sinus in 8 (30.8%); periorbit in 4 (15.4%); tongue in 3 (11.5%); and oropharyngeal wall in 1 (3.8%). The median EBRT dose before SBRT was 50.4 Gy (range 39.6 − 70.2). The major response rate was 100% with 21 (80.8%) complete responses (CR). Severe (grade ≥ 3) late toxicities developed in 9 (34.6%) patients, and SBRT boost volume was a significant parameter predicting severe late complication. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that a modern SBRT boost is a highly efficient tool for local tumor control. However, we observed a high frequency of serious late complications. More optimized dose fractionation schedule and patient selection are required to achieve excellent local control without significant late morbidities in head and neck boost treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3412714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34127142012-08-07 Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment Lee, Dong Soo Kim, Yeon Sil Cheon, Jae Seok Song, Jin Ho Son, Seok Hyun Jang, Ji Sun Kang, Young Nam Kang, Jing Hyoung Jung, So Lyoung Yoo, Ie Ryung Jang, Hong Seok Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 and July 2007, 26 patients with locally advanced, medically inoperable head and neck cancer or gross residual tumors in close proximity to critical structures following head and neck surgery were treated with SBRT as a boost treatment. All patients were initially treated with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). SBRT boost was prescribed to the median 80% isodose line with a median dose of 21 (range 10–25) Gy in 2–5 (median, 5) fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up after SBRT was 56 (range 27.6 − 80.2) months. The distribution of treatment sites in 26 patients was as follows: the nasopharynx, including the base of the skull in 10 (38.5%); nasal cavity or paranasal sinus in 8 (30.8%); periorbit in 4 (15.4%); tongue in 3 (11.5%); and oropharyngeal wall in 1 (3.8%). The median EBRT dose before SBRT was 50.4 Gy (range 39.6 − 70.2). The major response rate was 100% with 21 (80.8%) complete responses (CR). Severe (grade ≥ 3) late toxicities developed in 9 (34.6%) patients, and SBRT boost volume was a significant parameter predicting severe late complication. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that a modern SBRT boost is a highly efficient tool for local tumor control. However, we observed a high frequency of serious late complications. More optimized dose fractionation schedule and patient selection are required to achieve excellent local control without significant late morbidities in head and neck boost treatment. BioMed Central 2012-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3412714/ /pubmed/22691266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-85 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Dong Soo
Kim, Yeon Sil
Cheon, Jae Seok
Song, Jin Ho
Son, Seok Hyun
Jang, Ji Sun
Kang, Young Nam
Kang, Jing Hyoung
Jung, So Lyoung
Yoo, Ie Ryung
Jang, Hong Seok
Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title_full Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title_fullStr Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title_short Long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
title_sort long-term outcome and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy as a boost treatment for head and neck cancer: the importance of boost volume assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3412714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-85
work_keys_str_mv AT leedongsoo longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT kimyeonsil longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT cheonjaeseok longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT songjinho longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT sonseokhyun longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT jangjisun longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT kangyoungnam longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT kangjinghyoung longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT jungsolyoung longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT yooieryung longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment
AT janghongseok longtermoutcomeandtoxicityofhypofractionatedstereotacticbodyradiotherapyasaboosttreatmentforheadandneckcancertheimportanceofboostvolumeassessment