Cargando…

The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association

The paper starts with a brief discussion of the traditional peer review (TPR) system of research evaluation, its role, and the criticisms levelled at it. An analysis of specific problems in economics leads to a full discussion of the Open Peer Review (OPR) system developed by the World Economics Ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00054
_version_ 1782240023773446144
author Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
author_facet Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
author_sort Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
collection PubMed
description The paper starts with a brief discussion of the traditional peer review (TPR) system of research evaluation, its role, and the criticisms levelled at it. An analysis of specific problems in economics leads to a full discussion of the Open Peer Review (OPR) system developed by the World Economics Association (WEA) and the principles behind it. The system is open in the following two respects: (a) disclosure of names of authors and reviewers; and (b) inclusivity of potential reviewers in terms of paradigmatic approaches, country, and community. The paper then discusses the applicability of the same system to other disciplines. In doing so, it stressed the aims of various evaluation systems and the possible pitfalls of rating systems. It also speculates on the future of journal publication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3413091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34130912012-08-13 The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association Ietto-Gillies, Grazia Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience The paper starts with a brief discussion of the traditional peer review (TPR) system of research evaluation, its role, and the criticisms levelled at it. An analysis of specific problems in economics leads to a full discussion of the Open Peer Review (OPR) system developed by the World Economics Association (WEA) and the principles behind it. The system is open in the following two respects: (a) disclosure of names of authors and reviewers; and (b) inclusivity of potential reviewers in terms of paradigmatic approaches, country, and community. The paper then discusses the applicability of the same system to other disciplines. In doing so, it stressed the aims of various evaluation systems and the possible pitfalls of rating systems. It also speculates on the future of journal publication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3413091/ /pubmed/22891057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00054 Text en Copyright © 2012 Ietto-Gillies. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title_full The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title_fullStr The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title_short The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
title_sort evaluation of research papers in the xxi century. the open peer discussion system of the world economics association
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00054
work_keys_str_mv AT iettogilliesgrazia theevaluationofresearchpapersinthexxicenturytheopenpeerdiscussionsystemoftheworldeconomicsassociation
AT iettogilliesgrazia evaluationofresearchpapersinthexxicenturytheopenpeerdiscussionsystemoftheworldeconomicsassociation