Cargando…
Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145 |
_version_ | 1782240121642287104 |
---|---|
author | Loop, Matthew Shane Frazier-Wood, Alexis C. Thomas, Amy S. Dhurandhar, Emily J. Shikany, James M. Gadbury, Gary L. Allison, David B. |
author_facet | Loop, Matthew Shane Frazier-Wood, Alexis C. Thomas, Amy S. Dhurandhar, Emily J. Shikany, James M. Gadbury, Gary L. Allison, David B. |
author_sort | Loop, Matthew Shane |
collection | PubMed |
description | In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s response, and identifying the mediators of TRH are of interest to biomedical researchers. Clinical investigators and physicians commonly postulate that some of these mediators could be genetic. Current designs can estimate TRH as a function of specific, measurable observed factors; however, they cannot estimate the total amount of TRH, nor provide reliable estimates of individual persons’ responses. We propose a new repeated randomizations design (RRD), which can be conceived as a generalization of the Balaam design, that would allow estimates of that variability and facilitate estimation of the total amount of TRH, prediction of an individual’s response, and identification of the mediators of TRH. In a pilot study, we asked 118 subjects entering a weight loss trial for their opinion of the RRD, and they stated a preference for the RRD over the conventional two-arm parallel groups design. Research is needed as to how the RRD will work in practice and its relative statistical properties, and we invite dialog about it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3413942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34139422012-08-13 Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction Loop, Matthew Shane Frazier-Wood, Alexis C. Thomas, Amy S. Dhurandhar, Emily J. Shikany, James M. Gadbury, Gary L. Allison, David B. Front Genet Genetics In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s response, and identifying the mediators of TRH are of interest to biomedical researchers. Clinical investigators and physicians commonly postulate that some of these mediators could be genetic. Current designs can estimate TRH as a function of specific, measurable observed factors; however, they cannot estimate the total amount of TRH, nor provide reliable estimates of individual persons’ responses. We propose a new repeated randomizations design (RRD), which can be conceived as a generalization of the Balaam design, that would allow estimates of that variability and facilitate estimation of the total amount of TRH, prediction of an individual’s response, and identification of the mediators of TRH. In a pilot study, we asked 118 subjects entering a weight loss trial for their opinion of the RRD, and they stated a preference for the RRD over the conventional two-arm parallel groups design. Research is needed as to how the RRD will work in practice and its relative statistical properties, and we invite dialog about it. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3413942/ /pubmed/22891075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145 Text en Copyright © 2012 Loop, Frazier-Wood, Thomas, Dhurandhar, Shikany, Gadbury and Allison. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Loop, Matthew Shane Frazier-Wood, Alexis C. Thomas, Amy S. Dhurandhar, Emily J. Shikany, James M. Gadbury, Gary L. Allison, David B. Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title | Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title_full | Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title_fullStr | Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title_short | Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction |
title_sort | submitted for your consideration: potential advantages of a novel clinical trial design and initial patient reaction |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loopmatthewshane submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT frazierwoodalexisc submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT thomasamys submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT dhurandharemilyj submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT shikanyjamesm submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT gadburygaryl submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction AT allisondavidb submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction |