Cargando…

Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction

In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loop, Matthew Shane, Frazier-Wood, Alexis C., Thomas, Amy S., Dhurandhar, Emily J., Shikany, James M., Gadbury, Gary L., Allison, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145
_version_ 1782240121642287104
author Loop, Matthew Shane
Frazier-Wood, Alexis C.
Thomas, Amy S.
Dhurandhar, Emily J.
Shikany, James M.
Gadbury, Gary L.
Allison, David B.
author_facet Loop, Matthew Shane
Frazier-Wood, Alexis C.
Thomas, Amy S.
Dhurandhar, Emily J.
Shikany, James M.
Gadbury, Gary L.
Allison, David B.
author_sort Loop, Matthew Shane
collection PubMed
description In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s response, and identifying the mediators of TRH are of interest to biomedical researchers. Clinical investigators and physicians commonly postulate that some of these mediators could be genetic. Current designs can estimate TRH as a function of specific, measurable observed factors; however, they cannot estimate the total amount of TRH, nor provide reliable estimates of individual persons’ responses. We propose a new repeated randomizations design (RRD), which can be conceived as a generalization of the Balaam design, that would allow estimates of that variability and facilitate estimation of the total amount of TRH, prediction of an individual’s response, and identification of the mediators of TRH. In a pilot study, we asked 118 subjects entering a weight loss trial for their opinion of the RRD, and they stated a preference for the RRD over the conventional two-arm parallel groups design. Research is needed as to how the RRD will work in practice and its relative statistical properties, and we invite dialog about it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3413942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34139422012-08-13 Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction Loop, Matthew Shane Frazier-Wood, Alexis C. Thomas, Amy S. Dhurandhar, Emily J. Shikany, James M. Gadbury, Gary L. Allison, David B. Front Genet Genetics In many circumstances, individuals do not respond identically to the same treatment. This phenomenon, which is called treatment response heterogeneity (TRH), appears to be present in treatments for many conditions, including obesity. Estimating the total amount of TRH, predicting an individual’s response, and identifying the mediators of TRH are of interest to biomedical researchers. Clinical investigators and physicians commonly postulate that some of these mediators could be genetic. Current designs can estimate TRH as a function of specific, measurable observed factors; however, they cannot estimate the total amount of TRH, nor provide reliable estimates of individual persons’ responses. We propose a new repeated randomizations design (RRD), which can be conceived as a generalization of the Balaam design, that would allow estimates of that variability and facilitate estimation of the total amount of TRH, prediction of an individual’s response, and identification of the mediators of TRH. In a pilot study, we asked 118 subjects entering a weight loss trial for their opinion of the RRD, and they stated a preference for the RRD over the conventional two-arm parallel groups design. Research is needed as to how the RRD will work in practice and its relative statistical properties, and we invite dialog about it. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3413942/ /pubmed/22891075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145 Text en Copyright © 2012 Loop, Frazier-Wood, Thomas, Dhurandhar, Shikany, Gadbury and Allison. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Genetics
Loop, Matthew Shane
Frazier-Wood, Alexis C.
Thomas, Amy S.
Dhurandhar, Emily J.
Shikany, James M.
Gadbury, Gary L.
Allison, David B.
Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title_full Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title_fullStr Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title_full_unstemmed Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title_short Submitted for Your Consideration: Potential Advantages of a Novel Clinical Trial Design and Initial Patient Reaction
title_sort submitted for your consideration: potential advantages of a novel clinical trial design and initial patient reaction
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3413942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00145
work_keys_str_mv AT loopmatthewshane submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT frazierwoodalexisc submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT thomasamys submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT dhurandharemilyj submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT shikanyjamesm submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT gadburygaryl submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction
AT allisondavidb submittedforyourconsiderationpotentialadvantagesofanovelclinicaltrialdesignandinitialpatientreaction