Cargando…

A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of an intermediate molecular weight (MW) intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) with a low MW product on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic knee OA were enrolled inarandomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berenbaum, Francis, Grifka, Joachim, Cazzaniga, Sara, D'Amato, Massimo, Giacovelli, Giampaolo, Chevalier, Xavier, Rannou, Francois, Rovati, Lucio C, Maheu, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200972
_version_ 1782240177159143424
author Berenbaum, Francis
Grifka, Joachim
Cazzaniga, Sara
D'Amato, Massimo
Giacovelli, Giampaolo
Chevalier, Xavier
Rannou, Francois
Rovati, Lucio C
Maheu, Emmanuel
author_facet Berenbaum, Francis
Grifka, Joachim
Cazzaniga, Sara
D'Amato, Massimo
Giacovelli, Giampaolo
Chevalier, Xavier
Rannou, Francois
Rovati, Lucio C
Maheu, Emmanuel
author_sort Berenbaum, Francis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of an intermediate molecular weight (MW) intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) with a low MW product on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic knee OA were enrolled inarandomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial with the possibility to shift to superiority. Patients were randomised to GO-ON(MW 800–1500 kD, 25 mg/2.5 ml) or Hyalgan(MW 500–730 kD, 20 mg/2 ml) injected at 3-weekly intervals. The primary outcome was 6-month change in the WOMAC pain subscale (0–100 mm). Sample size was calculated on a non-inferiority margin of 9 mm, lower than the minimum perceptible clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included OARSI-OMERACT responder rates RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations consisted of 217 and 209 patients and 171 and 172 patients in the GO-ON and Hyalgan groups, respectively. ITT WOMAC pain of 47.5±1.0(SE) and 48.8±1.0 mm decreased by 22.9±1.4 mm with GO-ON and 18.4±1.5 mm with Hyalgan after 6 months. The primary analysis was conducted in the PP population followed by the ITT population.Mean (95% CI) differences in WOMAC pain change were 5.2 (0.9 to 9.6)mm and 4.5 (0.5 to 8.5)mm, respectively,favouring GO-ON, satisfying the claim for non-inferiority (lower limit>−9 mm) and for statistical superiority (95% CI all>0, p=0.021). Ahigher proportion of OARSI/OMERACT responders was observed with GO-ONthan with Hyalgan (73.3% vs58.4%, p=0.001). Both preparations were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 3-weekly injections of intermediate MW HA may be superior to low MW HA on knee OA symptoms over 6 months, with similar safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3414228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34142282012-08-09 A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis Berenbaum, Francis Grifka, Joachim Cazzaniga, Sara D'Amato, Massimo Giacovelli, Giampaolo Chevalier, Xavier Rannou, Francois Rovati, Lucio C Maheu, Emmanuel Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of an intermediate molecular weight (MW) intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) with a low MW product on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic knee OA were enrolled inarandomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial with the possibility to shift to superiority. Patients were randomised to GO-ON(MW 800–1500 kD, 25 mg/2.5 ml) or Hyalgan(MW 500–730 kD, 20 mg/2 ml) injected at 3-weekly intervals. The primary outcome was 6-month change in the WOMAC pain subscale (0–100 mm). Sample size was calculated on a non-inferiority margin of 9 mm, lower than the minimum perceptible clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included OARSI-OMERACT responder rates RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations consisted of 217 and 209 patients and 171 and 172 patients in the GO-ON and Hyalgan groups, respectively. ITT WOMAC pain of 47.5±1.0(SE) and 48.8±1.0 mm decreased by 22.9±1.4 mm with GO-ON and 18.4±1.5 mm with Hyalgan after 6 months. The primary analysis was conducted in the PP population followed by the ITT population.Mean (95% CI) differences in WOMAC pain change were 5.2 (0.9 to 9.6)mm and 4.5 (0.5 to 8.5)mm, respectively,favouring GO-ON, satisfying the claim for non-inferiority (lower limit>−9 mm) and for statistical superiority (95% CI all>0, p=0.021). Ahigher proportion of OARSI/OMERACT responders was observed with GO-ONthan with Hyalgan (73.3% vs58.4%, p=0.001). Both preparations were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 3-weekly injections of intermediate MW HA may be superior to low MW HA on knee OA symptoms over 6 months, with similar safety. BMJ Group 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3414228/ /pubmed/22294639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200972 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Berenbaum, Francis
Grifka, Joachim
Cazzaniga, Sara
D'Amato, Massimo
Giacovelli, Giampaolo
Chevalier, Xavier
Rannou, Francois
Rovati, Lucio C
Maheu, Emmanuel
A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title_full A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title_fullStr A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title_short A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
title_sort randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200972
work_keys_str_mv AT berenbaumfrancis arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT grifkajoachim arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT cazzanigasara arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT damatomassimo arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT giacovelligiampaolo arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT chevalierxavier arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT rannoufrancois arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT rovatilucioc arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT maheuemmanuel arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT berenbaumfrancis randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT grifkajoachim randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT cazzanigasara randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT damatomassimo randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT giacovelligiampaolo randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT chevalierxavier randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT rannoufrancois randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT rovatilucioc randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis
AT maheuemmanuel randomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrialcomparingtwointraarticularhyaluronicacidpreparationsdifferingbytheirmolecularweightinsymptomatickneeosteoarthritis