Cargando…
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this study we evaluated the grant peer review process (external reviewers’ ratings, and board of trustees’ final decision: approval or no approval for funding) at the Austrian Science Fund with respect to gend...
Autores principales: | Mutz, Rüdiger, Bornmann, Lutz, Daniel, Hans-Dieter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hogrefe Publishing
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23480982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000103 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach
por: Mutz, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
peer review of grant funding – the Australian perspective
por: Cappai, Roberto
Publicado: (2015) -
The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2008)