Cargando…
A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Chemoprevention crossover trials of tea can be more efficient than parallel designs but the attrition and compliance rates with such trials are unknown. METHODS: Attrition (dropouts) and compliance with treatment were assessed in a 25-week randomized, placebo controlled, crossover, feasi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22800470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-96 |
_version_ | 1782240251792588800 |
---|---|
author | Dash, Chiranjeev Chung, Fung-Lung Rohan, Joy Ann Phillips Greenspan, Emily Christopher, Patrick D Makambi, Kepher Hara, Yukihiko Newkirk, Kenneth Davidson, Bruce Adams-Campbell, Lucile L |
author_facet | Dash, Chiranjeev Chung, Fung-Lung Rohan, Joy Ann Phillips Greenspan, Emily Christopher, Patrick D Makambi, Kepher Hara, Yukihiko Newkirk, Kenneth Davidson, Bruce Adams-Campbell, Lucile L |
author_sort | Dash, Chiranjeev |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemoprevention crossover trials of tea can be more efficient than parallel designs but the attrition and compliance rates with such trials are unknown. METHODS: Attrition (dropouts) and compliance with treatment were assessed in a 25-week randomized, placebo controlled, crossover, feasibility clinical trial of four tea treatments to investigate the effect of tea on oral cancer biomarkers. Each treatment lasted 4 weeks with 2 weeks of washout in between. Participants were 32 smokers and 33 non-smokers without any evidence of premalignant oral lesions. The interventions consisted of packets of green tea, black tea, caffeinated water, or placebo. Participants were assigned to each treatment for four weeks, and were instructed to drink five packets per day while on the treatment. Dropout from the trial and compliance (consumption of ≥ 85% of the prescribed treatment packets) are the main outcome measures reported. RESULTS: There was a high rate of dropout (51%) from the study, and the rates were significantly higher among smokers (64%) than non-smokers (36%). Among participants who completed the study the rate of compliance was 72%. The highest rates of dropouts occurred between the first and second treatment visits in both smokers (38% dropout) and non-smokers (18% dropout). Throughout the study smokers were more likely to dropout than non-smokers. Black tea treatment was associated with the highest rates of dropout among smokers (37%), but was associated with the lowest rate of dropout among non-smokers (4%). CONCLUSIONS: In a study conducted to test the feasibility of a four-treatment crossover tea trial, a high rate of dropout among smokers and non-smokers was observed. Multi-arm crossover tea trials might pose a higher burden on participants and research is needed to improve adherence and treatment compliance in such trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN70410203 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3414766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34147662012-08-10 A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study Dash, Chiranjeev Chung, Fung-Lung Rohan, Joy Ann Phillips Greenspan, Emily Christopher, Patrick D Makambi, Kepher Hara, Yukihiko Newkirk, Kenneth Davidson, Bruce Adams-Campbell, Lucile L BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Chemoprevention crossover trials of tea can be more efficient than parallel designs but the attrition and compliance rates with such trials are unknown. METHODS: Attrition (dropouts) and compliance with treatment were assessed in a 25-week randomized, placebo controlled, crossover, feasibility clinical trial of four tea treatments to investigate the effect of tea on oral cancer biomarkers. Each treatment lasted 4 weeks with 2 weeks of washout in between. Participants were 32 smokers and 33 non-smokers without any evidence of premalignant oral lesions. The interventions consisted of packets of green tea, black tea, caffeinated water, or placebo. Participants were assigned to each treatment for four weeks, and were instructed to drink five packets per day while on the treatment. Dropout from the trial and compliance (consumption of ≥ 85% of the prescribed treatment packets) are the main outcome measures reported. RESULTS: There was a high rate of dropout (51%) from the study, and the rates were significantly higher among smokers (64%) than non-smokers (36%). Among participants who completed the study the rate of compliance was 72%. The highest rates of dropouts occurred between the first and second treatment visits in both smokers (38% dropout) and non-smokers (18% dropout). Throughout the study smokers were more likely to dropout than non-smokers. Black tea treatment was associated with the highest rates of dropout among smokers (37%), but was associated with the lowest rate of dropout among non-smokers (4%). CONCLUSIONS: In a study conducted to test the feasibility of a four-treatment crossover tea trial, a high rate of dropout among smokers and non-smokers was observed. Multi-arm crossover tea trials might pose a higher burden on participants and research is needed to improve adherence and treatment compliance in such trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN70410203 BioMed Central 2012-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3414766/ /pubmed/22800470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-96 Text en Copyright ©2012 Dash et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dash, Chiranjeev Chung, Fung-Lung Rohan, Joy Ann Phillips Greenspan, Emily Christopher, Patrick D Makambi, Kepher Hara, Yukihiko Newkirk, Kenneth Davidson, Bruce Adams-Campbell, Lucile L A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title | A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title_full | A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title_short | A six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
title_sort | six-month crossover chemoprevention clinical trial of tea in smokers and non-smokers: methodological issues in a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22800470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-96 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dashchiranjeev asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT chungfunglung asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT rohanjoyannphillips asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT greenspanemily asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT christopherpatrickd asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT makambikepher asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT harayukihiko asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT newkirkkenneth asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT davidsonbruce asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT adamscampbelllucilel asixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT dashchiranjeev sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT chungfunglung sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT rohanjoyannphillips sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT greenspanemily sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT christopherpatrickd sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT makambikepher sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT harayukihiko sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT newkirkkenneth sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT davidsonbruce sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy AT adamscampbelllucilel sixmonthcrossoverchemopreventionclinicaltrialofteainsmokersandnonsmokersmethodologicalissuesinafeasibilitystudy |