Cargando…

Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?

BACKGROUND: Lacerations account for a large number of ED visits. Is there a “golden period” beyond which lacerations should not be repaired primarily? What type of relationship exists between time of repair and wound infection rates? Is it linear or exponential? Currently, the influence of laceratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waseem, Muhammad, Lakdawala, Viraj, Patel, Rohit, Kapoor, Ramnath, Leber, Mark, Sun, Xuming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22835090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-32
_version_ 1782240266726408192
author Waseem, Muhammad
Lakdawala, Viraj
Patel, Rohit
Kapoor, Ramnath
Leber, Mark
Sun, Xuming
author_facet Waseem, Muhammad
Lakdawala, Viraj
Patel, Rohit
Kapoor, Ramnath
Leber, Mark
Sun, Xuming
author_sort Waseem, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lacerations account for a large number of ED visits. Is there a “golden period” beyond which lacerations should not be repaired primarily? What type of relationship exists between time of repair and wound infection rates? Is it linear or exponential? Currently, the influence of laceration age on the risk of infection in simple lacerations repaired is not clearly defined. We conducted this study to determine the influence of time of primary wound closure on the infection rate. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a laceration requiring closure from April 2009 to November 2010. The wound closure time was defined as the time interval from when the patient reported laceration occurred until the time of the start of the wound repair procedure. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the factors predictive of infection. A non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare the median differences of time of laceration repair. Chi-square (Fisher's exact) tests were performed to test for infection differences with regard to gender, race, location of laceration, mechanism of injury, co-morbidities, type of anesthesia and type of suture material used. RESULTS: Over the study period, 297 participants met the inclusion criteria and were followed. Of the included participants, 224 (75.4%) were male and 73 (24.6%) were female. Ten patients (3.4%) developed a wound infection. Of these infections, five occurred on hands, four on extremities (not hands) and one on the face. One of these patients was African American, seven were Hispanic and two were Caucasian (p = 0.0005). Median wound closure time in the infection group was 867 min and in the non-infection group 330 min (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Without controlling various confounding factors, the median wound closure time for the lacerations in the wound infection group was statistically significantly longer than in the non-infection group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3414831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34148312012-08-09 Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times? Waseem, Muhammad Lakdawala, Viraj Patel, Rohit Kapoor, Ramnath Leber, Mark Sun, Xuming Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Lacerations account for a large number of ED visits. Is there a “golden period” beyond which lacerations should not be repaired primarily? What type of relationship exists between time of repair and wound infection rates? Is it linear or exponential? Currently, the influence of laceration age on the risk of infection in simple lacerations repaired is not clearly defined. We conducted this study to determine the influence of time of primary wound closure on the infection rate. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a laceration requiring closure from April 2009 to November 2010. The wound closure time was defined as the time interval from when the patient reported laceration occurred until the time of the start of the wound repair procedure. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the factors predictive of infection. A non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare the median differences of time of laceration repair. Chi-square (Fisher's exact) tests were performed to test for infection differences with regard to gender, race, location of laceration, mechanism of injury, co-morbidities, type of anesthesia and type of suture material used. RESULTS: Over the study period, 297 participants met the inclusion criteria and were followed. Of the included participants, 224 (75.4%) were male and 73 (24.6%) were female. Ten patients (3.4%) developed a wound infection. Of these infections, five occurred on hands, four on extremities (not hands) and one on the face. One of these patients was African American, seven were Hispanic and two were Caucasian (p = 0.0005). Median wound closure time in the infection group was 867 min and in the non-infection group 330 min (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Without controlling various confounding factors, the median wound closure time for the lacerations in the wound infection group was statistically significantly longer than in the non-infection group. Springer 2012-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3414831/ /pubmed/22835090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-32 Text en Copyright ©2012 Waseem et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Waseem, Muhammad
Lakdawala, Viraj
Patel, Rohit
Kapoor, Ramnath
Leber, Mark
Sun, Xuming
Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title_full Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title_fullStr Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title_short Is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
title_sort is there a relationship between wound infections and laceration closure times?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22835090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-5-32
work_keys_str_mv AT waseemmuhammad istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes
AT lakdawalaviraj istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes
AT patelrohit istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes
AT kapoorramnath istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes
AT lebermark istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes
AT sunxuming istherearelationshipbetweenwoundinfectionsandlacerationclosuretimes