Cargando…
Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search
The relatively common experimental visual search task of finding a red X amongst red O’s and green X’s (conjunction search) presents the visual system with a binding problem. Illusory conjunctions (ICs) of features across objects must be avoided and only features present in the same object bound tog...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22908002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278 |
_version_ | 1782240273101750272 |
---|---|
author | Dent, Kevin Allen, Harriet A. Braithwaite, Jason J. Humphreys, Glyn W. |
author_facet | Dent, Kevin Allen, Harriet A. Braithwaite, Jason J. Humphreys, Glyn W. |
author_sort | Dent, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relatively common experimental visual search task of finding a red X amongst red O’s and green X’s (conjunction search) presents the visual system with a binding problem. Illusory conjunctions (ICs) of features across objects must be avoided and only features present in the same object bound together. Correct binding into unique objects by the visual system may be promoted, and ICs minimized, by inhibiting the locations of distractors possessing non-target features (e.g., Treisman and Sato, 1990). Such parallel rejection of interfering distractors leaves the target as the only item competing for selection; thus solving the binding problem. In the present article we explore the theoretical and empirical basis of this process of active distractor inhibition in search. Specific experiments that provide strong evidence for a process of active distractor inhibition in search are highlighted. In the final part of the article we consider how distractor inhibition, as defined here, may be realized at a neurophysiological level (Treisman and Sato, 1990). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3414861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34148612012-08-20 Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search Dent, Kevin Allen, Harriet A. Braithwaite, Jason J. Humphreys, Glyn W. Front Psychol Psychology The relatively common experimental visual search task of finding a red X amongst red O’s and green X’s (conjunction search) presents the visual system with a binding problem. Illusory conjunctions (ICs) of features across objects must be avoided and only features present in the same object bound together. Correct binding into unique objects by the visual system may be promoted, and ICs minimized, by inhibiting the locations of distractors possessing non-target features (e.g., Treisman and Sato, 1990). Such parallel rejection of interfering distractors leaves the target as the only item competing for selection; thus solving the binding problem. In the present article we explore the theoretical and empirical basis of this process of active distractor inhibition in search. Specific experiments that provide strong evidence for a process of active distractor inhibition in search are highlighted. In the final part of the article we consider how distractor inhibition, as defined here, may be realized at a neurophysiological level (Treisman and Sato, 1990). Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3414861/ /pubmed/22908002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278 Text en Copyright © 2012 Dent, Allen, Braithwaite and Humphreys. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Dent, Kevin Allen, Harriet A. Braithwaite, Jason J. Humphreys, Glyn W. Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title | Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title_full | Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title_fullStr | Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title_full_unstemmed | Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title_short | Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search |
title_sort | parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3414861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22908002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dentkevin paralleldistractorrejectionasabindingmechanisminsearch AT allenharrieta paralleldistractorrejectionasabindingmechanisminsearch AT braithwaitejasonj paralleldistractorrejectionasabindingmechanisminsearch AT humphreysglynw paralleldistractorrejectionasabindingmechanisminsearch |