Cargando…
The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095 |
_version_ | 1782240313665912832 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Albert P. Smith, Zachary A. Lall, Rohan R. Bresnahan, Lacey E. Fessler, Richard G. |
author_facet | Wong, Albert P. Smith, Zachary A. Lall, Rohan R. Bresnahan, Lacey E. Fessler, Richard G. |
author_sort | Wong, Albert P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed with open laminectomies. This involves removal of the spinous process, lamina, and the posterior musculoligamentous complex (posterior tension band). This approach provides excellent improvement in symptoms, but is also associated with potential postoperative spinal instability. This may result in subsequent need for spinal fusion. Advances in technology have enabled the application of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) as an acceptable alternative to open lumbar decompression. Recent studies have shown similar to improved perioperative outcomes when comparing MISS to open decompression for lumbar stenosis. A literature review of MISS for decompression of lumbar stenosis with tubular retractors was performed to evaluate the outcomes of this modern surgical technique. In addition, a discussion of the advantages and limitations of this technique is provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3415081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34150812012-08-16 The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results Wong, Albert P. Smith, Zachary A. Lall, Rohan R. Bresnahan, Lacey E. Fessler, Richard G. Minim Invasive Surg Review Article Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed with open laminectomies. This involves removal of the spinous process, lamina, and the posterior musculoligamentous complex (posterior tension band). This approach provides excellent improvement in symptoms, but is also associated with potential postoperative spinal instability. This may result in subsequent need for spinal fusion. Advances in technology have enabled the application of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) as an acceptable alternative to open lumbar decompression. Recent studies have shown similar to improved perioperative outcomes when comparing MISS to open decompression for lumbar stenosis. A literature review of MISS for decompression of lumbar stenosis with tubular retractors was performed to evaluate the outcomes of this modern surgical technique. In addition, a discussion of the advantages and limitations of this technique is provided. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3415081/ /pubmed/22900163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095 Text en Copyright © 2012 Albert P. Wong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wong, Albert P. Smith, Zachary A. Lall, Rohan R. Bresnahan, Lacey E. Fessler, Richard G. The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title | The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title_full | The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title_fullStr | The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title_full_unstemmed | The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title_short | The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results |
title_sort | microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongalbertp themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT smithzacharya themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT lallrohanr themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT bresnahanlaceye themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT fesslerrichardg themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT wongalbertp microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT smithzacharya microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT lallrohanr microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT bresnahanlaceye microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults AT fesslerrichardg microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults |