Cargando…

The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results

Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Albert P., Smith, Zachary A., Lall, Rohan R., Bresnahan, Lacey E., Fessler, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095
_version_ 1782240313665912832
author Wong, Albert P.
Smith, Zachary A.
Lall, Rohan R.
Bresnahan, Lacey E.
Fessler, Richard G.
author_facet Wong, Albert P.
Smith, Zachary A.
Lall, Rohan R.
Bresnahan, Lacey E.
Fessler, Richard G.
author_sort Wong, Albert P.
collection PubMed
description Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed with open laminectomies. This involves removal of the spinous process, lamina, and the posterior musculoligamentous complex (posterior tension band). This approach provides excellent improvement in symptoms, but is also associated with potential postoperative spinal instability. This may result in subsequent need for spinal fusion. Advances in technology have enabled the application of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) as an acceptable alternative to open lumbar decompression. Recent studies have shown similar to improved perioperative outcomes when comparing MISS to open decompression for lumbar stenosis. A literature review of MISS for decompression of lumbar stenosis with tubular retractors was performed to evaluate the outcomes of this modern surgical technique. In addition, a discussion of the advantages and limitations of this technique is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3415081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34150812012-08-16 The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results Wong, Albert P. Smith, Zachary A. Lall, Rohan R. Bresnahan, Lacey E. Fessler, Richard G. Minim Invasive Surg Review Article Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed with open laminectomies. This involves removal of the spinous process, lamina, and the posterior musculoligamentous complex (posterior tension band). This approach provides excellent improvement in symptoms, but is also associated with potential postoperative spinal instability. This may result in subsequent need for spinal fusion. Advances in technology have enabled the application of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) as an acceptable alternative to open lumbar decompression. Recent studies have shown similar to improved perioperative outcomes when comparing MISS to open decompression for lumbar stenosis. A literature review of MISS for decompression of lumbar stenosis with tubular retractors was performed to evaluate the outcomes of this modern surgical technique. In addition, a discussion of the advantages and limitations of this technique is provided. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3415081/ /pubmed/22900163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095 Text en Copyright © 2012 Albert P. Wong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wong, Albert P.
Smith, Zachary A.
Lall, Rohan R.
Bresnahan, Lacey E.
Fessler, Richard G.
The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title_full The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title_fullStr The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title_full_unstemmed The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title_short The Microendoscopic Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis: A Review of the Current Literature and Clinical Results
title_sort microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22900163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/325095
work_keys_str_mv AT wongalbertp themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT smithzacharya themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT lallrohanr themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT bresnahanlaceye themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT fesslerrichardg themicroendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT wongalbertp microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT smithzacharya microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT lallrohanr microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT bresnahanlaceye microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults
AT fesslerrichardg microendoscopicdecompressionoflumbarstenosisareviewofthecurrentliteratureandclinicalresults