Cargando…

Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terradas, Roser, Grau, Santiago, Blanch, Jordi, Riu, Marta, Saballs, Pere, Castells, Xavier, Horcajada, Juan Pablo, Knobel, Hernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860
_version_ 1782240358153846784
author Terradas, Roser
Grau, Santiago
Blanch, Jordi
Riu, Marta
Saballs, Pere
Castells, Xavier
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Knobel, Hernando
author_facet Terradas, Roser
Grau, Santiago
Blanch, Jordi
Riu, Marta
Saballs, Pere
Castells, Xavier
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Knobel, Hernando
author_sort Terradas, Roser
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·10(3)/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66–6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was <7 between the second and third day. CONCLUSION: Both sustained eosinopenia and persistence of an NLCR >7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3415420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34154202012-08-21 Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Terradas, Roser Grau, Santiago Blanch, Jordi Riu, Marta Saballs, Pere Castells, Xavier Horcajada, Juan Pablo Knobel, Hernando PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·10(3)/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66–6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was <7 between the second and third day. CONCLUSION: Both sustained eosinopenia and persistence of an NLCR >7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia. Public Library of Science 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3415420/ /pubmed/22912753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860 Text en © 2012 Terradas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Terradas, Roser
Grau, Santiago
Blanch, Jordi
Riu, Marta
Saballs, Pere
Castells, Xavier
Horcajada, Juan Pablo
Knobel, Hernando
Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860
work_keys_str_mv AT terradasroser eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT grausantiago eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT blanchjordi eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT riumarta eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT saballspere eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT castellsxavier eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT horcajadajuanpablo eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT knobelhernando eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy