Cargando…
Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860 |
_version_ | 1782240358153846784 |
---|---|
author | Terradas, Roser Grau, Santiago Blanch, Jordi Riu, Marta Saballs, Pere Castells, Xavier Horcajada, Juan Pablo Knobel, Hernando |
author_facet | Terradas, Roser Grau, Santiago Blanch, Jordi Riu, Marta Saballs, Pere Castells, Xavier Horcajada, Juan Pablo Knobel, Hernando |
author_sort | Terradas, Roser |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·10(3)/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66–6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was <7 between the second and third day. CONCLUSION: Both sustained eosinopenia and persistence of an NLCR >7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3415420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34154202012-08-21 Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Terradas, Roser Grau, Santiago Blanch, Jordi Riu, Marta Saballs, Pere Castells, Xavier Horcajada, Juan Pablo Knobel, Hernando PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: There is scarce evidence on the use of eosinophil count as a marker of outcome in patients with infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in eosinophil count, as well as the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), could be used as clinical markers of outcome in patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with a first episode of community-acquired or healthcare-related bacteremia during hospital admission between 2004 and 2009. A total of 2,311 patients were included. Cox regression was used to analyze the behaviour of eosinophil count and the NLCR in survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, the main independent risk factor for mortality was persistence of an eosinophil count below 0.0454·10(3)/uL (HR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.66–6.62). An NLCR value >7 was also an independent risk factor but was of lesser importance. The mean eosinophil count in survivors showed a tendency to increase rapidly and to achieve normal values between the second and third day. In these patients, the NLCR was <7 between the second and third day. CONCLUSION: Both sustained eosinopenia and persistence of an NLCR >7 were independent markers of mortality in patients with bacteremia. Public Library of Science 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3415420/ /pubmed/22912753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860 Text en © 2012 Terradas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Terradas, Roser Grau, Santiago Blanch, Jordi Riu, Marta Saballs, Pere Castells, Xavier Horcajada, Juan Pablo Knobel, Hernando Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Eosinophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terradasroser eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT grausantiago eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT blanchjordi eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT riumarta eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT saballspere eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT castellsxavier eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT horcajadajuanpablo eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT knobelhernando eosinophilcountandneutrophillymphocytecountratioasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithbacteremiaaretrospectivecohortstudy |