Cargando…
Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care
BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), despite its excellent reliability and validity in primary care, has not been examined for administration to psychiatric patients. This study assesses the accuracy of PHQ-9 in screening for major depressive episode and in diagnosing major depres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-73 |
_version_ | 1782240414398414848 |
---|---|
author | Inoue, Takeshi Tanaka, Teruaki Nakagawa, Shin Nakato, Yasuya Kameyama, Rie Boku, Shuken Toda, Hiroyuki Kurita, Tsugiko Koyama, Tsukasa |
author_facet | Inoue, Takeshi Tanaka, Teruaki Nakagawa, Shin Nakato, Yasuya Kameyama, Rie Boku, Shuken Toda, Hiroyuki Kurita, Tsugiko Koyama, Tsukasa |
author_sort | Inoue, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), despite its excellent reliability and validity in primary care, has not been examined for administration to psychiatric patients. This study assesses the accuracy of PHQ-9 in screening for major depressive episode and in diagnosing major depressive episode in patients of a psychiatric specialty clinic. METHODS: We compared operational characteristics of PHQ-9 as a screening and diagnostic instrument to DSM-IV-TR diagnosis by a trained psychiatrist as a reference standard. The reference criteria were “current major depressive episode” or “current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder”. PHQ-9 was used with two thresholds: diagnostic algorithm and summary scores (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The optimal cut-off points of PHQ-9 summary scores were analyzed using a receiver operational characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: For “current major depressive episode”, PHQ-9 showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but its specificity and positive predictive value were low. For “current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder”, PHQ-9 also showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but the positive predictive value decreased more than that for “current major depressive episode”. The ROC analysis showed the optimal cut-off score of 13/14 for “current major depressive episode”. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-9 is useful for screening, but not for diagnosis of “current major depressive episode” in a psychiatric specialty clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3416649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34166492012-08-11 Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care Inoue, Takeshi Tanaka, Teruaki Nakagawa, Shin Nakato, Yasuya Kameyama, Rie Boku, Shuken Toda, Hiroyuki Kurita, Tsugiko Koyama, Tsukasa BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), despite its excellent reliability and validity in primary care, has not been examined for administration to psychiatric patients. This study assesses the accuracy of PHQ-9 in screening for major depressive episode and in diagnosing major depressive episode in patients of a psychiatric specialty clinic. METHODS: We compared operational characteristics of PHQ-9 as a screening and diagnostic instrument to DSM-IV-TR diagnosis by a trained psychiatrist as a reference standard. The reference criteria were “current major depressive episode” or “current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder”. PHQ-9 was used with two thresholds: diagnostic algorithm and summary scores (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The optimal cut-off points of PHQ-9 summary scores were analyzed using a receiver operational characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: For “current major depressive episode”, PHQ-9 showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but its specificity and positive predictive value were low. For “current major depressive episode with major depressive disorder”, PHQ-9 also showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value at both thresholds, but the positive predictive value decreased more than that for “current major depressive episode”. The ROC analysis showed the optimal cut-off score of 13/14 for “current major depressive episode”. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-9 is useful for screening, but not for diagnosis of “current major depressive episode” in a psychiatric specialty clinic. BioMed Central 2012-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3416649/ /pubmed/22759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-73 Text en Copyright ©2012 Inoue et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Inoue, Takeshi Tanaka, Teruaki Nakagawa, Shin Nakato, Yasuya Kameyama, Rie Boku, Shuken Toda, Hiroyuki Kurita, Tsugiko Koyama, Tsukasa Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title | Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title_full | Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title_fullStr | Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title_short | Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
title_sort | utility and limitations of phq-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-73 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inouetakeshi utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT tanakateruaki utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT nakagawashin utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT nakatoyasuya utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT kameyamarie utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT bokushuken utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT todahiroyuki utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT kuritatsugiko utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare AT koyamatsukasa utilityandlimitationsofphq9inaclinicspecializinginpsychiatriccare |