Cargando…

Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Both angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Many clinical studies have demonstrated and compared the organ-protection effects and adverse events of these drugs. However, few large-scale studies have focus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishida, Yayoi, Takahashi, Yasuo, Nakayama, Tomohiro, Asai, Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-53
_version_ 1782240420633247744
author Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
author_facet Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
author_sort Nishida, Yayoi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Many clinical studies have demonstrated and compared the organ-protection effects and adverse events of these drugs. However, few large-scale studies have focused on the effect of these drugs as monotherapy on laboratory parameters. We evaluated and compared the effects of ARB and CCB monotherapy on clinical laboratory parameters in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We used data from the Clinical Data Warehouse of Nihon University School of Medicine obtained between Nov 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011, to identify cohorts of new ARB users (n = 601) and propensity-score matched new CCB users (n = 601), with concomitant mild to moderate hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used a multivariate-adjusted regression model to adjust for differences between ARB and CCB users, and compared laboratory parameters including serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), non-fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), sodium, potassium, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), hemoglobin and hematocrit, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) counts up to 12 months after the start of ARB or CCB monotherapy. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction of serum TC, HbA1c, hemoglobin and hematocrit and RBC count and a significant increase of serum potassium in ARB users, and a reduction of serum TC and hemoglobin in CCB users, from the baseline period to the exposure period. The reductions of RBC count, hemoglobin and hematocrit in ARB users were significantly greater than those in CCB users. The increase of serum potassium in ARB users was significantly greater than that in CCB users. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that hematological adverse effects and electrolyte imbalance are greater with ARB monotherapy than with CCB monotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3416676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34166762012-08-11 Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes Nishida, Yayoi Takahashi, Yasuo Nakayama, Tomohiro Asai, Satoshi Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Both angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Many clinical studies have demonstrated and compared the organ-protection effects and adverse events of these drugs. However, few large-scale studies have focused on the effect of these drugs as monotherapy on laboratory parameters. We evaluated and compared the effects of ARB and CCB monotherapy on clinical laboratory parameters in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We used data from the Clinical Data Warehouse of Nihon University School of Medicine obtained between Nov 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011, to identify cohorts of new ARB users (n = 601) and propensity-score matched new CCB users (n = 601), with concomitant mild to moderate hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We used a multivariate-adjusted regression model to adjust for differences between ARB and CCB users, and compared laboratory parameters including serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), non-fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), sodium, potassium, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), hemoglobin and hematocrit, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) counts up to 12 months after the start of ARB or CCB monotherapy. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction of serum TC, HbA1c, hemoglobin and hematocrit and RBC count and a significant increase of serum potassium in ARB users, and a reduction of serum TC and hemoglobin in CCB users, from the baseline period to the exposure period. The reductions of RBC count, hemoglobin and hematocrit in ARB users were significantly greater than those in CCB users. The increase of serum potassium in ARB users was significantly greater than that in CCB users. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that hematological adverse effects and electrolyte imbalance are greater with ARB monotherapy than with CCB monotherapy. BioMed Central 2012-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3416676/ /pubmed/22594344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-53 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nishida et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Nishida, Yayoi
Takahashi, Yasuo
Nakayama, Tomohiro
Asai, Satoshi
Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title_full Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title_short Comparative effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
title_sort comparative effect of angiotensin ii type i receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on laboratory parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-53
work_keys_str_mv AT nishidayayoi comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersandcalciumchannelblockersonlaboratoryparametersinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetes
AT takahashiyasuo comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersandcalciumchannelblockersonlaboratoryparametersinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetes
AT nakayamatomohiro comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersandcalciumchannelblockersonlaboratoryparametersinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetes
AT asaisatoshi comparativeeffectofangiotensiniitypeireceptorblockersandcalciumchannelblockersonlaboratoryparametersinhypertensivepatientswithtype2diabetes