Cargando…
The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479 |
_version_ | 1782240470110306304 |
---|---|
author | Dragan, Małgorzata Lis-Turlejska, Maja Popiel, Agnieszka Szumiał, Szymon Dragan, Wojciech Ł. |
author_facet | Dragan, Małgorzata Lis-Turlejska, Maja Popiel, Agnieszka Szumiał, Szymon Dragan, Wojciech Ł. |
author_sort | Dragan, Małgorzata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test its factor structure with reference to two models: an original three-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, and Arousal) and alternative five-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, Numbing, Dysphoric Arousal, and Anxious Arousal). METHOD: The validation procedure included three studies conducted on samples of separate populations: university-level students (n=507), individuals who had experienced various traumas (n=320), and treatment-seeking survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) (n=302). Various other measures of trauma-related psychopathology were administered to participants, as well as the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) in the case of MVA patients. RESULTS: PDS showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, good diagnostic agreement with SCID, good sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The satisfactory convergent validity was supported by a large number of significant correlations with other measures of trauma-related psychopathology. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) generally confirmed both the three-factor structure and the alternative five-factor structure of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results show generally good psychometric properties of the Polish version of PDS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3416974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34169742012-08-14 The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure Dragan, Małgorzata Lis-Turlejska, Maja Popiel, Agnieszka Szumiał, Szymon Dragan, Wojciech Ł. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test its factor structure with reference to two models: an original three-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, and Arousal) and alternative five-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, Numbing, Dysphoric Arousal, and Anxious Arousal). METHOD: The validation procedure included three studies conducted on samples of separate populations: university-level students (n=507), individuals who had experienced various traumas (n=320), and treatment-seeking survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) (n=302). Various other measures of trauma-related psychopathology were administered to participants, as well as the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) in the case of MVA patients. RESULTS: PDS showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, good diagnostic agreement with SCID, good sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The satisfactory convergent validity was supported by a large number of significant correlations with other measures of trauma-related psychopathology. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) generally confirmed both the three-factor structure and the alternative five-factor structure of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results show generally good psychometric properties of the Polish version of PDS. Co-Action Publishing 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3416974/ /pubmed/22893850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479 Text en © 2012 Małgorzata Dragan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Basic Research Article Dragan, Małgorzata Lis-Turlejska, Maja Popiel, Agnieszka Szumiał, Szymon Dragan, Wojciech Ł. The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title | The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title_full | The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title_fullStr | The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title_full_unstemmed | The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title_short | The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure |
title_sort | validation of the polish version of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale and its factor structure |
topic | Basic Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT draganmałgorzata thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT listurlejskamaja thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT popielagnieszka thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT szumiałszymon thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT draganwojciechł thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT draganmałgorzata validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT listurlejskamaja validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT popielagnieszka validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT szumiałszymon validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure AT draganwojciechł validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure |