Cargando…

The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dragan, Małgorzata, Lis-Turlejska, Maja, Popiel, Agnieszka, Szumiał, Szymon, Dragan, Wojciech Ł.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479
_version_ 1782240470110306304
author Dragan, Małgorzata
Lis-Turlejska, Maja
Popiel, Agnieszka
Szumiał, Szymon
Dragan, Wojciech Ł.
author_facet Dragan, Małgorzata
Lis-Turlejska, Maja
Popiel, Agnieszka
Szumiał, Szymon
Dragan, Wojciech Ł.
author_sort Dragan, Małgorzata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test its factor structure with reference to two models: an original three-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, and Arousal) and alternative five-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, Numbing, Dysphoric Arousal, and Anxious Arousal). METHOD: The validation procedure included three studies conducted on samples of separate populations: university-level students (n=507), individuals who had experienced various traumas (n=320), and treatment-seeking survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) (n=302). Various other measures of trauma-related psychopathology were administered to participants, as well as the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) in the case of MVA patients. RESULTS: PDS showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, good diagnostic agreement with SCID, good sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The satisfactory convergent validity was supported by a large number of significant correlations with other measures of trauma-related psychopathology. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) generally confirmed both the three-factor structure and the alternative five-factor structure of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results show generally good psychometric properties of the Polish version of PDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3416974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34169742012-08-14 The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure Dragan, Małgorzata Lis-Turlejska, Maja Popiel, Agnieszka Szumiał, Szymon Dragan, Wojciech Ł. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a self-descriptive measure developed to provide information regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report on the validation of the Polish version of PDS and to test its factor structure with reference to two models: an original three-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, and Arousal) and alternative five-factor model (Reexperiencing, Avoidance, Numbing, Dysphoric Arousal, and Anxious Arousal). METHOD: The validation procedure included three studies conducted on samples of separate populations: university-level students (n=507), individuals who had experienced various traumas (n=320), and treatment-seeking survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) (n=302). Various other measures of trauma-related psychopathology were administered to participants, as well as the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) in the case of MVA patients. RESULTS: PDS showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, good diagnostic agreement with SCID, good sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The satisfactory convergent validity was supported by a large number of significant correlations with other measures of trauma-related psychopathology. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) generally confirmed both the three-factor structure and the alternative five-factor structure of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The results show generally good psychometric properties of the Polish version of PDS. Co-Action Publishing 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3416974/ /pubmed/22893850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479 Text en © 2012 Małgorzata Dragan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research Article
Dragan, Małgorzata
Lis-Turlejska, Maja
Popiel, Agnieszka
Szumiał, Szymon
Dragan, Wojciech Ł.
The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title_full The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title_fullStr The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title_full_unstemmed The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title_short The validation of the Polish version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and its factor structure
title_sort validation of the polish version of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale and its factor structure
topic Basic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.18479
work_keys_str_mv AT draganmałgorzata thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT listurlejskamaja thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT popielagnieszka thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT szumiałszymon thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT draganwojciechł thevalidationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT draganmałgorzata validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT listurlejskamaja validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT popielagnieszka validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT szumiałszymon validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure
AT draganwojciechł validationofthepolishversionoftheposttraumaticdiagnosticscaleanditsfactorstructure