Cargando…

Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting

There is considerable clinical interest in the risks and benefits of offering oral water intake, in the form of water protocols, to patients with thin-liquid dysphagia. We describe the design and implementation of a water protocol for patients in a rehabilitation setting with videofluoroscopically c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlaw, Caren, Finlayson, Heather, Beggs, Kathleen, Visser, Tiffany, Marcoux, Caroline, Coney, Dawn, Steele, Catriona M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21928099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9366-9
_version_ 1782240474229112832
author Carlaw, Caren
Finlayson, Heather
Beggs, Kathleen
Visser, Tiffany
Marcoux, Caroline
Coney, Dawn
Steele, Catriona M.
author_facet Carlaw, Caren
Finlayson, Heather
Beggs, Kathleen
Visser, Tiffany
Marcoux, Caroline
Coney, Dawn
Steele, Catriona M.
author_sort Carlaw, Caren
collection PubMed
description There is considerable clinical interest in the risks and benefits of offering oral water intake, in the form of water protocols, to patients with thin-liquid dysphagia. We describe the design and implementation of a water protocol for patients in a rehabilitation setting with videofluoroscopically confirmed thin-liquid aspiration. The GF Strong Water Protocol (GFSWP) is an interdisciplinary initiative, with roles and accountabilities specified for different members of the interprofessional health-care team. Rules of the water protocol specify mode of water access (independent, supervised), the implementation of any safe swallowing strategies recommended on the basis of the patient’s videofluoroscopy, and procedures for evaluating and addressing oral care needs. Trial implementation of the water protocol in 15 participants showed that they remained free of adverse events, including pneumonia, over the course of an initial 14-day trial and continuing until discharge from the facility (range = 13–108 days). Seven participants were randomly assigned to a 14-day control phase in which they received standard care (without water access). Fluid intake measures taken after the oral water intake phase were increased (mean = 1,845 cc; 95% confidence interval: 1,520–2,169 cc) compared to those in the control phase (mean = 1,474 cc; 95% CI: 1,113–1,836 cc), with oral water intake measures comprising, on average, 563 cc (range = 238–888 cc) of the total post water trial fluid intake values. Fluid intake increased at least 10% of the calculated fluid requirements in 11/15 participants who received oral water access. These participants reported favorable quality-of-life outcomes, measured using the Swal-QOL. These findings support the implementation of the GFSWP, including its exclusion criteria, rules, and plans of care, for rehabilitation patients who aspirate thin liquids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34170962012-08-23 Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting Carlaw, Caren Finlayson, Heather Beggs, Kathleen Visser, Tiffany Marcoux, Caroline Coney, Dawn Steele, Catriona M. Dysphagia Original Article There is considerable clinical interest in the risks and benefits of offering oral water intake, in the form of water protocols, to patients with thin-liquid dysphagia. We describe the design and implementation of a water protocol for patients in a rehabilitation setting with videofluoroscopically confirmed thin-liquid aspiration. The GF Strong Water Protocol (GFSWP) is an interdisciplinary initiative, with roles and accountabilities specified for different members of the interprofessional health-care team. Rules of the water protocol specify mode of water access (independent, supervised), the implementation of any safe swallowing strategies recommended on the basis of the patient’s videofluoroscopy, and procedures for evaluating and addressing oral care needs. Trial implementation of the water protocol in 15 participants showed that they remained free of adverse events, including pneumonia, over the course of an initial 14-day trial and continuing until discharge from the facility (range = 13–108 days). Seven participants were randomly assigned to a 14-day control phase in which they received standard care (without water access). Fluid intake measures taken after the oral water intake phase were increased (mean = 1,845 cc; 95% confidence interval: 1,520–2,169 cc) compared to those in the control phase (mean = 1,474 cc; 95% CI: 1,113–1,836 cc), with oral water intake measures comprising, on average, 563 cc (range = 238–888 cc) of the total post water trial fluid intake values. Fluid intake increased at least 10% of the calculated fluid requirements in 11/15 participants who received oral water access. These participants reported favorable quality-of-life outcomes, measured using the Swal-QOL. These findings support the implementation of the GFSWP, including its exclusion criteria, rules, and plans of care, for rehabilitation patients who aspirate thin liquids. Springer-Verlag 2011-09-18 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3417096/ /pubmed/21928099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9366-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Carlaw, Caren
Finlayson, Heather
Beggs, Kathleen
Visser, Tiffany
Marcoux, Caroline
Coney, Dawn
Steele, Catriona M.
Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title_full Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title_fullStr Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title_short Outcomes of a Pilot Water Protocol Project in a Rehabilitation Setting
title_sort outcomes of a pilot water protocol project in a rehabilitation setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21928099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9366-9
work_keys_str_mv AT carlawcaren outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT finlaysonheather outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT beggskathleen outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT vissertiffany outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT marcouxcaroline outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT coneydawn outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting
AT steelecatrionam outcomesofapilotwaterprotocolprojectinarehabilitationsetting