Cargando…

Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis

PURPOSE: Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a recently developed breast cancer imaging technique. In order to enhance successful clinical implementation, we quantified the potential clinical value of different scenarios incorporating PA imaging by means of multi-criteria analysis. From this analysis, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilgerink, Marjolein P, Hummel, Marjan JM, Manohar, Srirang, Vaartjes, Simon R, IJzerman, Maarten J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915937
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S20169
_version_ 1782240554522771456
author Hilgerink, Marjolein P
Hummel, Marjan JM
Manohar, Srirang
Vaartjes, Simon R
IJzerman, Maarten J
author_facet Hilgerink, Marjolein P
Hummel, Marjan JM
Manohar, Srirang
Vaartjes, Simon R
IJzerman, Maarten J
author_sort Hilgerink, Marjolein P
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a recently developed breast cancer imaging technique. In order to enhance successful clinical implementation, we quantified the potential clinical value of different scenarios incorporating PA imaging by means of multi-criteria analysis. From this analysis, the most promising area of application for PA imaging in breast cancer diagnosis is determined, and recommendations are provided to optimize the design of PA imaging. METHODS: The added value of PA imaging was assessed in two areas of application in the diagnostic track. These areas include PA imaging as an alternative to x-ray mammography and ultrasonography in early stage diagnosis, and PA imaging as an alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in later stage diagnosis. The added value of PA imaging was assessed with respect to four main criteria (costs, diagnostic performance, patient comfort and risks). An expert panel composed of medical, technical and management experts was asked to assess the relative importance of the criteria in comparing the alternative diagnostic devices. The judgments of the experts were quantified based on the validated pairwise comparison technique of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, a technique for multi-criteria analysis. Sensitivity analysis was applied to account for the uncertainty of the outcomes. RESULTS: Among the considered alternatives, PA imaging is the preferred technique due to its non-invasiveness, low cost and low risks. However, the experts do not expect large differences in diagnostic performance. The outcomes suggest that design changes to improve the diagnostic performance of PA imaging should focus on the quality of the reconstruction algorithm, detector sensitivity, detector bandwidth and the number of wavelengths used. CONCLUSION: The AHP method was useful in recommending the most promising area of application in the diagnostic track for which PA imaging can be implemented, this being early diagnosis, as a substitute for the combined use of x-ray mammography and ultrasonography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34178812012-08-22 Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis Hilgerink, Marjolein P Hummel, Marjan JM Manohar, Srirang Vaartjes, Simon R IJzerman, Maarten J Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a recently developed breast cancer imaging technique. In order to enhance successful clinical implementation, we quantified the potential clinical value of different scenarios incorporating PA imaging by means of multi-criteria analysis. From this analysis, the most promising area of application for PA imaging in breast cancer diagnosis is determined, and recommendations are provided to optimize the design of PA imaging. METHODS: The added value of PA imaging was assessed in two areas of application in the diagnostic track. These areas include PA imaging as an alternative to x-ray mammography and ultrasonography in early stage diagnosis, and PA imaging as an alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in later stage diagnosis. The added value of PA imaging was assessed with respect to four main criteria (costs, diagnostic performance, patient comfort and risks). An expert panel composed of medical, technical and management experts was asked to assess the relative importance of the criteria in comparing the alternative diagnostic devices. The judgments of the experts were quantified based on the validated pairwise comparison technique of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, a technique for multi-criteria analysis. Sensitivity analysis was applied to account for the uncertainty of the outcomes. RESULTS: Among the considered alternatives, PA imaging is the preferred technique due to its non-invasiveness, low cost and low risks. However, the experts do not expect large differences in diagnostic performance. The outcomes suggest that design changes to improve the diagnostic performance of PA imaging should focus on the quality of the reconstruction algorithm, detector sensitivity, detector bandwidth and the number of wavelengths used. CONCLUSION: The AHP method was useful in recommending the most promising area of application in the diagnostic track for which PA imaging can be implemented, this being early diagnosis, as a substitute for the combined use of x-ray mammography and ultrasonography. Dove Medical Press 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3417881/ /pubmed/22915937 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S20169 Text en © 2011 Hilgerink et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hilgerink, Marjolein P
Hummel, Marjan JM
Manohar, Srirang
Vaartjes, Simon R
IJzerman, Maarten J
Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title_full Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title_fullStr Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title_short Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
title_sort assessment of the added value of the twente photoacoustic mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915937
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S20169
work_keys_str_mv AT hilgerinkmarjoleinp assessmentoftheaddedvalueofthetwentephotoacousticmammoscopeinbreastcancerdiagnosis
AT hummelmarjanjm assessmentoftheaddedvalueofthetwentephotoacousticmammoscopeinbreastcancerdiagnosis
AT manoharsrirang assessmentoftheaddedvalueofthetwentephotoacousticmammoscopeinbreastcancerdiagnosis
AT vaartjessimonr assessmentoftheaddedvalueofthetwentephotoacousticmammoscopeinbreastcancerdiagnosis
AT ijzermanmaartenj assessmentoftheaddedvalueofthetwentephotoacousticmammoscopeinbreastcancerdiagnosis