Cargando…

The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. We assessed whether the addition of PROs in routine clinical care affected the duration of the consultation and patient’s and clinician’s views. METHOD: Consecutiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santana, Maria J, Feeny, David, Weinkauf, Justin, Nador, Roland, Kapasi, Ali, Jackson, Kathleen, Schafenacker, Marianne, Zuk, Dalyce, Lien, Dale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S11943
_version_ 1782240558662549504
author Santana, Maria J
Feeny, David
Weinkauf, Justin
Nador, Roland
Kapasi, Ali
Jackson, Kathleen
Schafenacker, Marianne
Zuk, Dalyce
Lien, Dale
author_facet Santana, Maria J
Feeny, David
Weinkauf, Justin
Nador, Roland
Kapasi, Ali
Jackson, Kathleen
Schafenacker, Marianne
Zuk, Dalyce
Lien, Dale
author_sort Santana, Maria J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. We assessed whether the addition of PROs in routine clinical care affected the duration of the consultation and patient’s and clinician’s views. METHOD: Consecutive lung–heart transplant patients visiting the outpatient clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI) on touchscreen computers. Information on the patient’s responses was made available to the members of the transplant team prior to the encounter with the patient. The duration of clinical encounters was noted. At the end of every visit, clinicians completed a questionnaire on the usefulness of having PRO information available. After 6 months patients completed a survey of their experiences. RESULTS: The final patient sample consisted of 172 patients with a mean (SD) age of 52 (13.3) years old; 47% were female; 68% were organ recipients and 32% candidates. The transplant team, comprising four pulmunologists, two nurses, and one pharmacist had an average of 9 years of practical experience in pulmunology. The mean duration of patient–clinician encounters in minutes was 15.15 (4.52). Ninety-eight percent of patients indicated that they would be happy to complete the CRQ and HUI at every clinic visit. Ninety-one percent of the assessments completed by clinicians showed complete satisfaction with the use of PROs in routine practice. Further, the clinicians developed guidelines for the use of PRO information in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of PRO measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients resulted in a reduction of the duration of patient–clinician encounters. The experience was well accepted by patients and clinicians. We conclude that the routine use of PROs in lung–heart transplant patients has become standard practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179022012-08-22 The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients Santana, Maria J Feeny, David Weinkauf, Justin Nador, Roland Kapasi, Ali Jackson, Kathleen Schafenacker, Marianne Zuk, Dalyce Lien, Dale Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. We assessed whether the addition of PROs in routine clinical care affected the duration of the consultation and patient’s and clinician’s views. METHOD: Consecutive lung–heart transplant patients visiting the outpatient clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI) on touchscreen computers. Information on the patient’s responses was made available to the members of the transplant team prior to the encounter with the patient. The duration of clinical encounters was noted. At the end of every visit, clinicians completed a questionnaire on the usefulness of having PRO information available. After 6 months patients completed a survey of their experiences. RESULTS: The final patient sample consisted of 172 patients with a mean (SD) age of 52 (13.3) years old; 47% were female; 68% were organ recipients and 32% candidates. The transplant team, comprising four pulmunologists, two nurses, and one pharmacist had an average of 9 years of practical experience in pulmunology. The mean duration of patient–clinician encounters in minutes was 15.15 (4.52). Ninety-eight percent of patients indicated that they would be happy to complete the CRQ and HUI at every clinic visit. Ninety-one percent of the assessments completed by clinicians showed complete satisfaction with the use of PROs in routine practice. Further, the clinicians developed guidelines for the use of PRO information in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of PRO measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients resulted in a reduction of the duration of patient–clinician encounters. The experience was well accepted by patients and clinicians. We conclude that the routine use of PROs in lung–heart transplant patients has become standard practice. Dove Medical Press 2010-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3417902/ /pubmed/22915956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S11943 Text en © 2010 Santana et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Santana, Maria J
Feeny, David
Weinkauf, Justin
Nador, Roland
Kapasi, Ali
Jackson, Kathleen
Schafenacker, Marianne
Zuk, Dalyce
Lien, Dale
The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title_full The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title_fullStr The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title_full_unstemmed The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title_short The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
title_sort use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S11943
work_keys_str_mv AT santanamariaj theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT feenydavid theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT weinkaufjustin theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT nadorroland theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT kapasiali theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT jacksonkathleen theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT schafenackermarianne theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT zukdalyce theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT liendale theuseofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT santanamariaj useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT feenydavid useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT weinkaufjustin useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT nadorroland useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT kapasiali useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT jacksonkathleen useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT schafenackermarianne useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT zukdalyce useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients
AT liendale useofpatientreportedoutcomesbecomesstandardpracticeintheroutineclinicalcareoflunghearttransplantpatients