Cargando…

Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solomon, Cristina, Winterhalter, Michael, Gilde, Isabel, Hoy, Ludwig, Calatzis, Andreas, Rahe-Meyer, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915904
_version_ 1782240559569567744
author Solomon, Cristina
Winterhalter, Michael
Gilde, Isabel
Hoy, Ludwig
Calatzis, Andreas
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
author_facet Solomon, Cristina
Winterhalter, Michael
Gilde, Isabel
Hoy, Ludwig
Calatzis, Andreas
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
author_sort Solomon, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during cardiac surgery. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may be used as point-of-care method to monitor perioperative changes in platelet function. Since MEA assesses macroaggregation which is influenced by the plasmatic levels of unbound calcium, citrate may be inadequate as anticoagulant for MEA. We used citrate and heparin for MEA samples, to see with which anticoagulant the intraoperative decrease and postoperative recovery in platelet function previously described with other aggregometric methods in cardiac surgery may be observed with MEA. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 60 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and the samples were collected in standard tubes containing unfractionated heparin (50 U/mL) or trisodium citrate (3.2%). The samples were obtained before CPB, at 30 minutes on CPB, end of CPB and on the first postoperative day. MEA was performed using the Multiplate® analyzer. Collagen (COLtest, 100 μg/mL) and TRAP-6 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAPtest, 1mM/mL) were used as aggregation agonists. RESULTS: Platelet aggregometric response decreased significantly during CPB. Platelet aggregation assessed using TRAP-6 as agonist on heparinized blood significantly correlated with the duration of CPB (r = −0.41, p = 0.001, 2-tailed Pearson test). The aggregometric analysis performed on the first postoperative day showed a significant recovery in platelet activity in the samples containing heparin (increase from 30 ± 22 U to 46 ± 27 U for the COLtest and from 70 ± 34 U to 95 ± 32 U for the TRAPtest, p < 0.001, Student’s t-test), while no significant recovery of platelet function could be established in the MEA measurements performed with citrated blood. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of blood sample anticoagulant used for impedance aggregometry influenced the platelet aggregation response. Postoperative platelet function recovery was only detected in the heparinized samples. Heparin seems to be better suited than citrate for the analysis of impedance aggregometry in heart surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179062012-08-22 Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery Solomon, Cristina Winterhalter, Michael Gilde, Isabel Hoy, Ludwig Calatzis, Andreas Rahe-Meyer, Niels Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during cardiac surgery. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may be used as point-of-care method to monitor perioperative changes in platelet function. Since MEA assesses macroaggregation which is influenced by the plasmatic levels of unbound calcium, citrate may be inadequate as anticoagulant for MEA. We used citrate and heparin for MEA samples, to see with which anticoagulant the intraoperative decrease and postoperative recovery in platelet function previously described with other aggregometric methods in cardiac surgery may be observed with MEA. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 60 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and the samples were collected in standard tubes containing unfractionated heparin (50 U/mL) or trisodium citrate (3.2%). The samples were obtained before CPB, at 30 minutes on CPB, end of CPB and on the first postoperative day. MEA was performed using the Multiplate® analyzer. Collagen (COLtest, 100 μg/mL) and TRAP-6 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAPtest, 1mM/mL) were used as aggregation agonists. RESULTS: Platelet aggregometric response decreased significantly during CPB. Platelet aggregation assessed using TRAP-6 as agonist on heparinized blood significantly correlated with the duration of CPB (r = −0.41, p = 0.001, 2-tailed Pearson test). The aggregometric analysis performed on the first postoperative day showed a significant recovery in platelet activity in the samples containing heparin (increase from 30 ± 22 U to 46 ± 27 U for the COLtest and from 70 ± 34 U to 95 ± 32 U for the TRAPtest, p < 0.001, Student’s t-test), while no significant recovery of platelet function could be established in the MEA measurements performed with citrated blood. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of blood sample anticoagulant used for impedance aggregometry influenced the platelet aggregation response. Postoperative platelet function recovery was only detected in the heparinized samples. Heparin seems to be better suited than citrate for the analysis of impedance aggregometry in heart surgery. Dove Medical Press 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3417906/ /pubmed/22915904 Text en © 2008 Solomon et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Solomon, Cristina
Winterhalter, Michael
Gilde, Isabel
Hoy, Ludwig
Calatzis, Andreas
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title_full Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title_short Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
title_sort influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915904
work_keys_str_mv AT solomoncristina influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery
AT winterhaltermichael influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery
AT gildeisabel influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery
AT hoyludwig influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery
AT calatzisandreas influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery
AT rahemeyerniels influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery