Cargando…
Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery
BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915904 |
_version_ | 1782240559569567744 |
---|---|
author | Solomon, Cristina Winterhalter, Michael Gilde, Isabel Hoy, Ludwig Calatzis, Andreas Rahe-Meyer, Niels |
author_facet | Solomon, Cristina Winterhalter, Michael Gilde, Isabel Hoy, Ludwig Calatzis, Andreas Rahe-Meyer, Niels |
author_sort | Solomon, Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during cardiac surgery. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may be used as point-of-care method to monitor perioperative changes in platelet function. Since MEA assesses macroaggregation which is influenced by the plasmatic levels of unbound calcium, citrate may be inadequate as anticoagulant for MEA. We used citrate and heparin for MEA samples, to see with which anticoagulant the intraoperative decrease and postoperative recovery in platelet function previously described with other aggregometric methods in cardiac surgery may be observed with MEA. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 60 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and the samples were collected in standard tubes containing unfractionated heparin (50 U/mL) or trisodium citrate (3.2%). The samples were obtained before CPB, at 30 minutes on CPB, end of CPB and on the first postoperative day. MEA was performed using the Multiplate® analyzer. Collagen (COLtest, 100 μg/mL) and TRAP-6 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAPtest, 1mM/mL) were used as aggregation agonists. RESULTS: Platelet aggregometric response decreased significantly during CPB. Platelet aggregation assessed using TRAP-6 as agonist on heparinized blood significantly correlated with the duration of CPB (r = −0.41, p = 0.001, 2-tailed Pearson test). The aggregometric analysis performed on the first postoperative day showed a significant recovery in platelet activity in the samples containing heparin (increase from 30 ± 22 U to 46 ± 27 U for the COLtest and from 70 ± 34 U to 95 ± 32 U for the TRAPtest, p < 0.001, Student’s t-test), while no significant recovery of platelet function could be established in the MEA measurements performed with citrated blood. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of blood sample anticoagulant used for impedance aggregometry influenced the platelet aggregation response. Postoperative platelet function recovery was only detected in the heparinized samples. Heparin seems to be better suited than citrate for the analysis of impedance aggregometry in heart surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3417906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34179062012-08-22 Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery Solomon, Cristina Winterhalter, Michael Gilde, Isabel Hoy, Ludwig Calatzis, Andreas Rahe-Meyer, Niels Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during cardiac surgery. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may be used as point-of-care method to monitor perioperative changes in platelet function. Since MEA assesses macroaggregation which is influenced by the plasmatic levels of unbound calcium, citrate may be inadequate as anticoagulant for MEA. We used citrate and heparin for MEA samples, to see with which anticoagulant the intraoperative decrease and postoperative recovery in platelet function previously described with other aggregometric methods in cardiac surgery may be observed with MEA. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 60 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and the samples were collected in standard tubes containing unfractionated heparin (50 U/mL) or trisodium citrate (3.2%). The samples were obtained before CPB, at 30 minutes on CPB, end of CPB and on the first postoperative day. MEA was performed using the Multiplate® analyzer. Collagen (COLtest, 100 μg/mL) and TRAP-6 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAPtest, 1mM/mL) were used as aggregation agonists. RESULTS: Platelet aggregometric response decreased significantly during CPB. Platelet aggregation assessed using TRAP-6 as agonist on heparinized blood significantly correlated with the duration of CPB (r = −0.41, p = 0.001, 2-tailed Pearson test). The aggregometric analysis performed on the first postoperative day showed a significant recovery in platelet activity in the samples containing heparin (increase from 30 ± 22 U to 46 ± 27 U for the COLtest and from 70 ± 34 U to 95 ± 32 U for the TRAPtest, p < 0.001, Student’s t-test), while no significant recovery of platelet function could be established in the MEA measurements performed with citrated blood. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of blood sample anticoagulant used for impedance aggregometry influenced the platelet aggregation response. Postoperative platelet function recovery was only detected in the heparinized samples. Heparin seems to be better suited than citrate for the analysis of impedance aggregometry in heart surgery. Dove Medical Press 2008-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3417906/ /pubmed/22915904 Text en © 2008 Solomon et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Solomon, Cristina Winterhalter, Michael Gilde, Isabel Hoy, Ludwig Calatzis, Andreas Rahe-Meyer, Niels Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title | Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title_full | Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title_fullStr | Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title_short | Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
title_sort | influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solomoncristina influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery AT winterhaltermichael influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery AT gildeisabel influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery AT hoyludwig influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery AT calatzisandreas influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery AT rahemeyerniels influenceofthesampleanticoagulantonthemeasurementsofimpedanceaggregometryincardiacsurgery |