Cargando…

A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important quality assurance measure in the delivery of health care. We conducted a prospective study to assess patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. AIMS: To assess current patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pather, Selvan, Tai, Davina, Philp, Shannon, Nattress, Kathryn, Carter, Jonathan, Dalrymple, Christopher, Atkinson, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S13624
_version_ 1782240561185423360
author Pather, Selvan
Tai, Davina
Philp, Shannon
Nattress, Kathryn
Carter, Jonathan
Dalrymple, Christopher
Atkinson, Ken
author_facet Pather, Selvan
Tai, Davina
Philp, Shannon
Nattress, Kathryn
Carter, Jonathan
Dalrymple, Christopher
Atkinson, Ken
author_sort Pather, Selvan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important quality assurance measure in the delivery of health care. We conducted a prospective study to assess patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. AIMS: To assess current patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit and identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients attending a tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. Patients were invited to participate and, if they agreed, were given a validated questionnaire to complete at the end of their consultation. Descriptive statistics were then used to analyze the data and identify potential areas of improvement. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were recruited, and 96% of patients were satisfied with the overall level of care received. Significant positive features of the service included helpfulness of the staff, cleanliness of the facility, and measures implemented to respect patient privacy. Lack of patient parking, waiting times in the clinic, difficulties in contacting the service, and locating the building were identified as areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: Patients attending our facility were largely satisfied with the overall level of care received. Nonclinical factors including parking, waiting times, and access to the service were identified as areas for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179142012-08-22 A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit Pather, Selvan Tai, Davina Philp, Shannon Nattress, Kathryn Carter, Jonathan Dalrymple, Christopher Atkinson, Ken Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important quality assurance measure in the delivery of health care. We conducted a prospective study to assess patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. AIMS: To assess current patient satisfaction at a large tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit and identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients attending a tertiary oncology/dysplasia unit. Patients were invited to participate and, if they agreed, were given a validated questionnaire to complete at the end of their consultation. Descriptive statistics were then used to analyze the data and identify potential areas of improvement. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were recruited, and 96% of patients were satisfied with the overall level of care received. Significant positive features of the service included helpfulness of the staff, cleanliness of the facility, and measures implemented to respect patient privacy. Lack of patient parking, waiting times in the clinic, difficulties in contacting the service, and locating the building were identified as areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: Patients attending our facility were largely satisfied with the overall level of care received. Nonclinical factors including parking, waiting times, and access to the service were identified as areas for improvement. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3417914/ /pubmed/22915960 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S13624 Text en © 2010 Pather et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pather, Selvan
Tai, Davina
Philp, Shannon
Nattress, Kathryn
Carter, Jonathan
Dalrymple, Christopher
Atkinson, Ken
A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title_full A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title_fullStr A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title_short A prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
title_sort prospective study assessing patient satisfaction at a large tertiary gynecologic oncology/dysplasia unit
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S13624
work_keys_str_mv AT patherselvan aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT taidavina aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT philpshannon aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT nattresskathryn aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT carterjonathan aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT dalrymplechristopher aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT atkinsonken aprospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT patherselvan prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT taidavina prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT philpshannon prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT nattresskathryn prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT carterjonathan prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT dalrymplechristopher prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit
AT atkinsonken prospectivestudyassessingpatientsatisfactionatalargetertiarygynecologiconcologydysplasiaunit