Cargando…

Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score

BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is a patient-rated, 12-item questionnaire that measures quality of life in relation to elbow disorders. This English questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument. Recently, the OES has been translated into Dutch and examined for its rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Haan, Jeroen, Schep, Niels, Tuinebreijer, Wim, Patka, Peter, den Hartog, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S22257
_version_ 1782240564549255168
author de Haan, Jeroen
Schep, Niels
Tuinebreijer, Wim
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
author_facet de Haan, Jeroen
Schep, Niels
Tuinebreijer, Wim
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
author_sort de Haan, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is a patient-rated, 12-item questionnaire that measures quality of life in relation to elbow disorders. This English questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument. Recently, the OES has been translated into Dutch and examined for its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a group of Dutch patients with elbow pathology. The aim of this study was to analyze the Dutch version of the OES (OES-DV) in combination with Rasch analysis or the one-parameter item response theory to examine the structure of the questionnaire. METHODS: The OES-DV was administered to 103 patients (68 female, 35 male). The mean age of the patients was 44.3 ± 14.7 (range 15–75) years. Rasch analysis was performed using the Winsteps(®) Rasch Measurement Version 3.70.1.1 and a rating scale parameterization. RESULTS: The person separation index, which is a measure of person reliability, was excellent (2.30). All the items of the OES had a reasonable mean square infit or outfit value between 0.6 and 1.7. The threshold of items were ordered, so the categories can function as intended. Principal component analysis of the residuals partly confirmed the multidimensionality of the English version of the OES. The OES distinguished 3.4 strata, which indicates that about three ranges can be differentiated. CONCLUSION: Rasch analysis of the OES-DV showed that the data fit to the stringent Rasch model. The multidimensionality of the English version of the OES was partly confirmed, and the four items of the function and three items of the pain domain were recognized as separate domains. The category rating scale of the OES-DV works well. The OES can distinguish 3.4 strata. This conclusion can only be applied to elbow dislocations, which were the largest group of patients studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179302012-08-22 Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score de Haan, Jeroen Schep, Niels Tuinebreijer, Wim Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is a patient-rated, 12-item questionnaire that measures quality of life in relation to elbow disorders. This English questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument. Recently, the OES has been translated into Dutch and examined for its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a group of Dutch patients with elbow pathology. The aim of this study was to analyze the Dutch version of the OES (OES-DV) in combination with Rasch analysis or the one-parameter item response theory to examine the structure of the questionnaire. METHODS: The OES-DV was administered to 103 patients (68 female, 35 male). The mean age of the patients was 44.3 ± 14.7 (range 15–75) years. Rasch analysis was performed using the Winsteps(®) Rasch Measurement Version 3.70.1.1 and a rating scale parameterization. RESULTS: The person separation index, which is a measure of person reliability, was excellent (2.30). All the items of the OES had a reasonable mean square infit or outfit value between 0.6 and 1.7. The threshold of items were ordered, so the categories can function as intended. Principal component analysis of the residuals partly confirmed the multidimensionality of the English version of the OES. The OES distinguished 3.4 strata, which indicates that about three ranges can be differentiated. CONCLUSION: Rasch analysis of the OES-DV showed that the data fit to the stringent Rasch model. The multidimensionality of the English version of the OES was partly confirmed, and the four items of the function and three items of the pain domain were recognized as separate domains. The category rating scale of the OES-DV works well. The OES can distinguish 3.4 strata. This conclusion can only be applied to elbow dislocations, which were the largest group of patients studied. Dove Medical Press 2011-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3417930/ /pubmed/22915975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S22257 Text en © 2011 de Haan et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Haan, Jeroen
Schep, Niels
Tuinebreijer, Wim
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_full Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_short Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_sort rasch analysis of the dutch version of the oxford elbow score
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S22257
work_keys_str_mv AT dehaanjeroen raschanalysisofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT schepniels raschanalysisofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT tuinebreijerwim raschanalysisofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT patkapeter raschanalysisofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT denhartogdennis raschanalysisofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore